Methodological clarification for estimating the input of plant-derived carbon in soils under elevated CO 2 based on a 13 C-enriched CO 2 labeling experiment

Yu Zhao,Shuai Shao,Sean M. Schaeffer,Xuelian Bao,Wei Zhang,Biao Zhu,Hongbo He,Xudong Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04121-x
IF: 4.993
2019-01-01
Plant and Soil
Abstract:Background and aims Under the scenario of global change, continuous 13 C-enriched CO 2 labeling is a powerful tool for evaluating the interaction between plants and soil, especially the influence of elevated CO 2 on the input of plant-derived C (new C) into soil in the short term. However, the methodological validity concerning the acquisition of isotopic signals and their implications in plants and soil remains ambiguous. Methods We conducted an experiment simulating elevated CO 2 with wheat planted in growth chambers. 13 C-enriched CO 2 with identical 13 C abundance was supplied at two CO 2 concentration levels (350 versus 600 ppm) until wheat harvest. The δ 13 C values of plant tissues and soil were measured periodically during the growing season. Results The δ 13 C values of wheat tissues under elevated 13 CO 2 were 15–17% higher than those under ambient 13 CO 2 after the heading stage, implying that the 13 C signals themselves in plants and soil were not directly representative of the influence of elevated CO 2 on the C fixation in the plant and thereby the flow of plant-derived C into soil. The proportion of plant-derived C in the soil (f new ) was calculated separately at each CO 2 concentration by taking the initial soil as a reference and the corresponding δ 13 C values as parameters in the mixing model, and we found that elevated CO 2 significantly enhanced the new soil C input by approximately 35.5% during our 62-day labeling. In our experiment, the f new value under elevated CO 2 could be overestimated by up to 1.7 times if the alteration of 13 C signatures in photosynthates caused by the change in CO 2 concentration is ignored. Conclusions For methodological clarification, we suggest that 1) 13 C labeling is essential in all CO 2 treatments to achieve CO 2 concentration-dependent 13 C signals in plants and soil, and that 2) the influence of elevated CO 2 on soil C turnover can be estimated by the difference in the f new under the two CO 2 concentrations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?