Abstract:Michel Agier’s Managing the Undesirables is one of several texts that addresses the complex and proliferating humanitarian infrastructure that is increasingly prevalent in regions of the world besieged by violence and displacement, but his work stands out as particularly important and innovative. Agier addresses some of the central questions facing our world today: belonging, personhood, and the ability of those most cut off from political power to speak for themselves and shape their own lives, and he does so in a way that combines passion and keen observation. In doing so, his work should be of interest to a broad range of sociologists who study social inequality and the structures (even those built from the best of intentions) that perpetuate it. In this volume, Agier explores the concept of humanitarian government, the political apparatus set up during emergency situations that takes responsibility for the life and death of individuals no longer protected adequately by a state. For as Agier shows, a refugee camp is far more than a place of shelters and emergency food aid. They are places in which someone decides who gets plastic sheeting and who does not, who receives food rations and for how long, what social programs should be put into place and who should be in charge of them, and what barriers need to be constructed (barbed wired, armed guards, cinderblock walls) to ostensibly protect those inside but also to protect the local population from incursions of these displaced ‘‘undesirables.’’ Further, these ‘‘camps’’ are hardly temporary shelters; many have existed for decades, taking on the appearance of towns and cities with entrepreneurs setting up small businesses and political elites emerging from the post-flight chaos. And yet, the camp is a hybrid social form, taking the shape of something entirely new from what existed before in the lives of its inhabitants, and as Agier convincingly argues, it exists in a state of exception, outside the bounds of the political and social life that humanitarian law and human rights ostensibly guarantee. Agier uses his ethnologist’s eye for culture to analyze observations he made during fieldwork in refugee camps in Kenya, Zambia, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea between 2000-2007, accessing the camps through Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF; in English, Doctors Without Borders). His affiliation with MSF gave him a level of flexibility and independence (particularly from the United Nations High Commission for Refugees) that allowed him sufficient time in the camps to not only observe humanitarian government at work but also the response of the refugees under its purview. He combines his observations with detailed histories of different migrations, explaining the historical and geographic paths that led different groups of refugees to the camps that he studied. Agier demonstrates the discursive power that humanitarian organizations have over defining and categorizing the displaced individuals in the camps; defining a person’s status as a refugee leads to acceptance into the camp and the security that brings, but the denial of such status leads to rejection and often deportation back to life-threatening circumstances. Once determined as a refugee, a person’s suffering and vulnerability come to define their place in the camp and the world, with moral hierarchies created around different definitions of vulnerability with different access to resources provided by the humanitarian organization. This process, Agier argues, de-socializes refugees; they lose their individual personhood and either become ahistorical, pitiable masses that the charitable-at-heart seek to keep alive, or potential threats to order and the safety of the non-displaced that must be managed or

Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention: Interests and Consequences

Market Threads: How Cotton Farmers and Traders Create A Global Commodity

The Idea of State Sovereignty and the Right of Humanitarian Intervention

From Solferino to Sarajevo

Intervention by invitation and collective self-defence: two sides of the same coin?

Humanitarianism as a tool of statecraft: contested authority, sovereign violence, and humanity in the Syrian civil war

Health and foreign policy in question: the case of humanitarian action

The Justice of Need and the Activation of Humanitarian Norms

Giving evil its due Judith Shklar’s (Ambiguous) cosmopolitan realism and world politics

Thoughts on war: The other pillar of Judith Shklar’s Global Political Theory

The military physician and contested medical humanitarianism: A dueling identity?

Spotlight Session on Autonomous Weapons Systems at ICRC 34th International Conference

Peace at Home, Conflict Abroad: Government Ideology, Mission Type, and Parliamentary Support for Military Interventions

Intervention in American Diplomatic History

PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS AND THE DEMORALIZATION OF HUMANITARIANISM

Feminist perspectives on the history of humanitarian relief (1870-1945)

Human Rights and New Horizons? Thoughts toward a New Juridical Ontology

America'S Military Interventionism: A Social Evolutionary Interpretation

The political and security dimensions of the humanitarian health response to violent conflict

The geopolitical strategy of refugee camps

The Role of the Ethical Underpinnings of International Humanitarian Law in the Age of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems