Abstract:Using the comparative approach, researchers draw inferences about the evolution of cognition. Psychologists have postulated several hypotheses to explain why certain species are cognitively more flexible than others, and these hypotheses assume that certain cognitive skills are linked together to create a generally “smart” species. However, empirical findings suggest that several animal species are highly specialized, showing exceptional skills in single cognitive domains while performing poorly in others. Although some cognitive skills may indeed overlap, we cannot a priori assume that they do across species. We argue that the term “cognition” has often been used by applying an anthropocentric viewpoint rather than a biocentric one. As a result, researchers tend to overrate cognitive skills that are human-like and assume that certain skills cluster together in other animals as they do in our own species. In this paper, we emphasize that specific physical and social environments create selection pressures that lead to the evolution of certain cognitive adaptations. Skills such as following the pointing gesture, tool-use, perspective-taking, or the ability to cooperate evolve independently from each other as a concrete result of specific selection pressures, and thus have appeared in distantly related species. Thus, there is not “one cognition”. Our argument is founded upon traditional Darwinian thinking, which—although always at the forefront of biology—has sometimes been neglected in animal cognition research. In accordance with the biocentric approach, we advocate a broader empirical perspective as we are convinced that to better understand animal minds, comparative researchers should focus much more on questions and experiments that are ecologically valid. We should investigate nonhuman cognition for its own sake, not only in comparison to the human model.

Innovation in chimpanzees

Animal and human innovation: novel problems and novel solutions

Can Sol's Explanation for the Evolution of Animal Innovation Account for Human Innovation?

Chimpanzees use social information to acquire a skill they fail to innovate

Eureka!: What Is Innovation, How Does It Develop, and Who Does It?

Wild chimpanzees select tool material based on efficiency and knowledge

From mechanisms to function: an integrated framework of animal innovation

Who innovates? Abundance of novel and familiar food changes which animals are most persistent

Chimpanzee intellect: personality, performance and motivation with touchscreen tasks

Environmental variability supports chimpanzee behavioural diversity

Animal Creativity as a Function of Behavioral Innovation and Behavior Flexibility in Problem-solving Situations

The virtue of innovation: innovation through the lenses of biological evolution

Problem-solving skills are predicted by technical innovations in the wild and brain size in passerines

The Ai project: historical and ecological contexts

Stable long-term individual variation in chimpanzee technological efficiency

The effects of tradition on problem solving by two wild populations of bearded capuchin monkeys in a probing task

Novelty Response of Wild African Apes to Camera Traps

Animal cognition in the field: performance of wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) on a reversal learning task

Innovation and geographic spread of a complex foraging culture in an urban parrot

Old and New Approaches to Animal Cognition: There Is Not “One Cognition”

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) navigate to find hidden fruit in a virtual environment