Abstract:Food hoarding provides animals access to resources during periods of scarcity. Studies on mammalian caching indicate associations with brain size, seasonality and diet but are biased to a subset of rodents. Whether the behaviour is generalizable at other taxonomic scales and/or is influenced by other ecological factors is less understood. Population density may influence food caching due to food competition or pilferage, but this remains untested in a comparative framework. Using phylogenetic analyses, we assessed the role of morphology (body and brain size), climate, diet breadth and population density on food caching behaviour evolution at multiple taxonomic scales. We also used a long-term dataset on caching behaviour of red squirrels (Tamiasciurus fremonti) to test key factors (climate and population density) on hoarding intensity. Consistent with previous smaller scale studies, we found the mammalian ancestral state for food caching was larderhoarding, and scatterhoarding was derived. Caching strategy was strongly associated with brain size, population density and climate. Mammals with larger brains and hippocampal volumes were more likely to scatterhoard, and species living at higher population densities and in colder climates were more likely to larderhoard. Finer-scale analyses within families, sub-families and tribes indicated that the behaviour is evolutionary labile. Brain size in family Sciuridae and tribe Marmotini was larger in scatterhoarders, but not in other tribes. Scatterhoarding in tribe Marmotini was more likely in species with lower population densities while scatterhoarding in tribe Sciurini was associated with warmer climates. Red squirrel larderhoarding intensity was positively related to population density but not climate, implicating food competition or pilferage as an important mechanism mediating caching behaviour. Our results are consistent with previous smaller-scale studies on food caching and indicate the evolutionary patterns of mammalian food caching are broadly generalizable. Given the lability of caching behaviour as evidenced by the variability of our results at finer phylogenetic scales, comparative analyses must consider taxonomic scale. Applying our results to conservation could prove useful as changes in population density or climate may select for different food caching strategies and thus can inform management of threatened and endangered species and their habitats.

Who innovates? Abundance of novel and familiar food changes which animals are most persistent

Animal and human innovation: novel problems and novel solutions

Cultural inheritance and diversification of diet in variable environments

Trait specialization, innovation, and the evolution of culture in fluctuating environments

Can Sol's Explanation for the Evolution of Animal Innovation Account for Human Innovation?

From mechanisms to function: an integrated framework of animal innovation

Eureka!: What Is Innovation, How Does It Develop, and Who Does It?

Innovation in chimpanzees

Role of immigrant males and muzzle contacts in the uptake of a novel food by wild vervet monkeys

Does novelty influence the foraging decisions of a scavenger?

On the quest for novelty in ecology

Innovation and geographic spread of a complex foraging culture in an urban parrot

Problem-solving skills are predicted by technical innovations in the wild and brain size in passerines

Natural reward as the fundamental macroevolutionary force

Evolutionary lability of food caching behaviour in mammals

The virtue of innovation: innovation through the lenses of biological evolution

On the Measurement of Ecological Novelty: Scale-Eating Pupfish Are Separated by 168 my from Other Scale-Eating Fishes

Exploration of environmental changes relates to lifestyle

Novelty and uncertainty differentially drive exploration across development

The Role of Umwelt in Animal Curiosity: A Within and Between Species Comparison of Novelty Exploration in Mongooses

Children and innovation: play, play objects and object play in cultural evolution