Advanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Jean-Michel Correas,Ethan J. Halpern,Richard G. Barr,Sangeet Ghai,Jochen Walz,Sylvain Bodard,Charles Dariane,Jean de la Rosette
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03193-0
2020-04-18
World Journal of Urology
Abstract:The diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) can be challenging due to the limited performance of current diagnostic tests, including PSA, digital rectal examination and transrectal conventional US. Multiparametric MRI has improved PCa diagnosis and is recommended prior to biopsy; however, mp-MRI does miss a substantial number of PCa. Advanced US modalities include transrectal prostate elastography and contrast-enhanced US, as well as improved B-mode, micro-US and micro-Doppler techniques. These techniques can be combined to define a novel US approach, multiparametric US (mp-US). Mp-US improves PCa diagnosis but is not sufficiently accurate to obviate the utility of mp-MRI. Mp-US using advanced techniques and mp-MRI provide complementary information which will become even more important in the era of focal therapy, where precise identification of PCa location is needed.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the challenging problems in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Current diagnostic methods, such as prostate - specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal conventional ultrasound (TRUS), have limitations in performance. Although multi - parameter magnetic resonance imaging (mp - MRI) has improved the diagnosis rate of prostate cancer, it still misses a considerable number of prostate cancer cases. Therefore, this article explores advanced ultrasound techniques, including transrectal prostate elastography and contrast - enhanced ultrasound, as well as improved B - mode, micro - ultrasound and micro - Doppler techniques, which can be used in combination to define a new ultrasound method - multi - parameter ultrasound (mp - US). Although mp - US has improved the diagnosis of prostate cancer, its accuracy is not sufficient to completely replace the role of mp - MRI. The author believes that the complementary information provided by mp - US and mp - MRI will become more important in the era of local treatment because it is necessary to accurately identify the location of prostate cancer.