Abstract:In the pre-Chernobyl period, the task of fast reactors was to provide fuel for the intensive development of nuclear energy with a deficit of natural uranium: short doubling time, high HF, high heat intensity, short campaign. After the Chernobyl accident, the main thing was to ensure safety, including in beyond design basis and postulated accidents. Modern fast sodium reactors must, on the one hand, satisfy the safety requirements in design and beyond design basis accidents (in accordance with the requirements of GEN-IV), and on the other, be competitive in comparison with water reactors and other energy sources. The article discusses the methods of transformation of the core of existing and planned Russian fast reactors to meet these requirements. The safety of these reactors in design and beyond design basis accidents is ensured by rejecting the upper end shield and replacing it with a sodium cavity, which allows reducing the NER and ensuring the input of negative reactivity when sodium boils. Such an core is implemented in BN-800 and the designed BN-1200. Improving the competitiveness (increasing the duration of the fuel campaign and KIUM) of the designed and existing reactors is ensured by switching to radiation-resistant clad steel EK164 (currently sold in BN-600, planned in BN-800) and the transition to the core with an axial layer of depleted uranium dioxide (planned for BN-800 and BN-1200). In BN-1200, due to the abandonment of a number of switchgear elements and optimization of the design, a one-and-a-half reduction in metal consumption is achieved. For fuel economy, a ′′thick′′ fuel rod with a diameter of 9.3 mm and a fuel campaign of 4 years have been adopted. This reduces the annual consumption of fuel rods and fuel assemblies by 2-2.5 times. Both events require modernization of the core. Each of these events allows you to increase the duration of the campaign by 25 %, and the implementation of both measures (transition to new steel and the introduction of a layer) will allow you to increase the campaign and reduce fuel consumption by more than 50 %. The introduction of the axial layer does not require core expansion, which gives additional fuel savings. But the axial layer should not be located in the central plane of the core, but with a shift of 3-5 cm downward. This will improve many characteristics of the core: increase fuel enrichment by a quarter and, as a result, proportionally reduce the neutron flux and radiation damage to the claddings of fuel elements; increase the fuel campaign to 5 years; to reduce the reactivity margin for burnout, without compromising the effectiveness of the control systems, to increase the micro-campaign to 1 year; to level the heat-release field in the vertical direction, to reduce the maximum heat intensity; to improve the course of beyond design basis accidents like ULOF. This method of reducing the rate of accumulation of a damaging dose is equally effective for both MOX and nitride fuels, which makes it possible to unify the core design.

Program for CNFC R&D using BN-800

THE POSSIBILITY OF REFINING PLUTONIUM IN THE BN-800

1 IAEA-CN-245-405 THE BN-800 CORE WITH MOX FUEL

Hydrometallurgical and combined technologies fast reactor MNUP and MOX UNF reprocessing

A Preliminary Work on the Preparation for Neutron Irradiation of Advanced Fusion Materials Using Small Samples in China

Conceptual Study of Neutron Physics of Nuclear Fuel Cycle for Ceramic Fast Reactor

Calculation and experimental analysis of BN-800 neutron-physical characteristics during the transition to mixed oxide fuel loading

FEATURES OF THE CORE OF PERSPECTIVE FAST REACTORS

Research study of possibility producing radioisotope Mo-99 in the active core of the BN-600 reactor using an irradiated assembly with a high flux of thermal and resonance neutrons

Practical Design of a Breed-and-Burn Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor with Rotational Fuel Shuffling Strategy

Utilization of spent nuclear fuel and transuranic actinides in a two-component nuclear power industry

Possible ways to solve the problems of using MOX fuel in thermal reactors

The Concept of a Nuclear Power Unit on the Basis of a Low-Power Multipurpose Test Research Reactor with Supercritical Light-Water Coolant

Role of fast sodium reactors in closure of the nuclear fuel cycle in the nuclear power system

Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing and Nuclear Materials Recycling in Two-Component Nuclear Energy

Coolant nuclid kinetics for fast reactors

BN-800: Spent Fuel Dose Rates and the Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement

Neutronic Analysis of Modular Gas-cooled Fast Reactor for 5-25% of Plutonium Fuel using Parallelization MCNP6 Code

Preliminary Neutronics Analyses of China Dual-Functional Lithium-Lead (DFLL) Test Blanket Module for CFETR

Pre-conceptual study of small modular PbBi-cooled nitride fuel reactor core characteristics

Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor Annular UN Fuel Design and Development of Performance Analysis Program