Investigation of a three‐dimensional printed dynamic cervical spine model for anatomy and physiology education

William Clifton,Aaron Damon,Christy Soares,Eric Nottmeier,Mark Pichelmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23607
2020-05-05
Clinical Anatomy
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Introduction</h3><p>Three‐dimensional (3D) printing of anatomical structures is a growing method of education for students and medical trainees. These models are generally produced as static representations of gross surface anatomy. In order to create a model that provides educators with a tool for demonstration of kinematic and physiologic concepts in addition to surface anatomy, a high‐resolution segmentation and 3D‐printing technique was investigated for the creation of a dynamic educational model.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>An anonymized CT scan of the cervical spine with a diagnosis of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament was acquired. Using a high‐resolution thresholding technique, the individual facet and intervertebral spaces were separated, and models of the C3‐7 vertebrae were 3D‐printed. The models were placed on a myelography simulator and subjected to flexion and extension under fluoroscopy, and measurements of the spinal canal diameter were recorded and compared to in‐vivo measurements. The flexible 3D‐printed model was then compared to a static 3D‐printed model to determine the educational benefit of demonstrating physiologic concepts.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The canal diameter changes on the flexible 3D printed model accurately reflected in‐vivo measurements during dynamic positioning. The flexible model also was also more successful in teaching the physiologic concepts of spinal canal changes during flexion and extension than the static 3D‐printed model to a cohort of learners.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Dynamic 3D‐printed models can provide educators with a cost‐effective and novel educational tool for not just instruction of surface anatomy, but also physiologic concepts through 3D ex‐vivo modeling of case‐specific physiologic and pathologic conditions.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p></section>
anatomy & morphology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?