Abstract:Many campaigns targeting pro-environmental behavior combine multiple approaches without properly understanding how these different approaches interact. Here we study the effect of such combinations. We apply construal level theory to classify different intervention approaches, which can either be at a high construal level (abstract and distant) or at a low construal level (concrete and proximal). In a field experiment we recruited 197 students living in one-person apartments in an all-inclusive student housing facility. We objectively measured their individual electricity and warm water use, and measured psychological variables through surveys. We expected that the (commonly considered superior) combination between a high and a low construal level approach would be least effective. Participants were randomly assigned to a 2(Construal Level: low vs. high) × 2(Social Distance: low vs. high) plus control condition mixed-model design targeting a reduction in warm water use. Our findings suggest that a congruent combination at a high construal level (i.e., the high construal level condition combined with the high social distance condition) has the largest effect on warm water use and that spillover to electricity use is most likely to occur when a high construal level is used (i.e., high social distance). Moreover, especially participants who valued nature and the environment less were most strongly influenced by the combination of two high construal level approaches. In sum, our study suggests that when designing interventions one should consider the construal level and when targeting pro-environmental behavior high construal levels appear most appropriate.

Behavioral spillover effects from a social information campaign

A Drop in the Ocean? Fostering Water-Saving Behavior and Spillover Through Information Provision and Feedback

Beware of Side Effects? Spillover Evidence from a Hot Water Intervention

CEP Discussion Paper No 1602 February 2019 Making Smart Meters Smarter the Smart Way

The influence of water-conservation messages on reducing household water use

Promoting Water Conservation Based on the Matching Effect of Regulatory Focus and Emotion

Do Announcement and Implementation of Prices and Subsidies Differentially Affect Water Consumption

Long-term water conservation is fostered by smart meter-based feedback and digital user engagement

What Causes Heterogeneous Responses to Social Comparison Messages for Water Conservation?

How to Predict Future Pro-Environmental Intention? the Spillover Effect of Electricity-Saving Behavior under Environmental and Monetary Framing

The Effects of Policy Announcement, Prices and Subsidies on Water Consumption

Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Information and Pricing on Residential Electricity Consumption

Which construal level combinations generate the most effective interventions? A field experiment on energy conservation

For cash, the planet, or for both: Evaluating an informational intervention for energy consumption reduction

Reducing hot water consumption through real-time feedback and social comparison using persuasive technologies: evidence from a Swiss energy-efficient district

Spillover effect of congestion charging on pro-environmental behavior

Norm proximity and optimal social comparisons for energy conservation behavior

The Role of Curtailment Versus Efficiency on Spillovers Among Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Evidence from Two Towns in Granada, Spain

Public Perception of Water Consumption and Its Effects on Water Conservation Behavior

When water conservation matters: Examining how water scarcity experiences create windows of opportunity for effective water-saving policy initiatives

Water conservation campaigns in an emerging economy: how effective are they?