Abstract:Background Access cavity preparation is a crucial step in nonsurgical root canal treatment. Recent advancements in access cavity designs focus on preserving maximum tooth structure while ensuring sufficient access to canal orifices for effective cleaning and shaping, resulting in minimally invasive procedures. However, there is limited information on the impact of three-dimensional (3D)-guided access cavity preparation in molars. A literature review found no prior studies comparing the effects of various access cavity preparation techniques on apical transportation, untouched surfaces, and debris formation within the canal. Objective The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the effects of three different access cavity techniques on apical transportation, untouched surfaces, and debris formation within the root canal. Material and methods Thirty extracted permanent mandibular first molars were selected and randomly assigned to three groups for this study: Group I received 3D-printed static guided cavity preparation, Group II underwent conservative access cavity preparation, and Group III was subjected to traditional access cavity (TAC) preparation. The mesial canals in all samples were cleaned and shaped using TruNatomy files. Preoperative and postoperative micro-CT imaging was performed on each sample to assess the effects of the different access cavity preparation techniques on apical transportation, untouched surfaces, and debris formation within the root canal. Results The study found that Group I, which used 3D-printed static guided cavity preparation, exhibited significantly less apical transportation compared to Groups II and III, with mean differences of -0.1677 and -0.2079, respectively. Debris accumulation was similar across all groups, with mean values of 0.928 ± 0.824 for Group I, 0.751 ± 0.495 for Group II, and 0.938 ± 0.681 for Group III, indicating no significant impact of cavity preparation type on debris levels. For untouched canal surfaces, Group III (TAC preparation) had the fewest untouched surfaces, with mean differences of 3.0380 and 3.9020 compared to Groups II and I, respectively. Conclusions While TAC preparation reduces substantial tooth structure, it shows higher instrumentation efficacy and better cleaning of the root canal system. However, in complex cases where tooth structure preservation is crucial, guided access cavity preparation provides an effective balance between structural conservation and adequate canal access. This approach offers a tailored solution, optimizing treatment outcomes based on the specific clinical scenario.

Comparative evaluation of porosity distribution in root canals obturated with gutta-percha using single-cone technique and thermoplasticized technique

In vitro evaluation of the quality of obturation with capillary condensation technique and hybrid technique in teeth with simulated internal resorption cavity: A cone-beam computed tomography study

Comparing Warm and Cold Gutta-Percha Techniques for Root Canal Filling: An In Vitro Study

Micro-computed tomography evaluation of root canal filling quality with apical negative pressure

[Evaluation of the Filling Quality of Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques Using Micro-Ct].

Photomicrographic evaluation of the apical sealing capacity of three types of gutta-percha master cones: an in vitro study

Quality of Obturation Achieved by A Non-Gutta-Percha-Based Root Filling System in Single-Rooted Canals

An in Vitro Comparison Study on Sealing Ability of Four Thermoplasticized Guttapercha Obturation Techniques with Cold Lateral Condensation

Evaluation of Adaptation of Root Canal Filled with Three Obturation Techniques in Vitro

Comparative Evaluation of Solubility of Gutta-Percha in Three Different Solvents: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Study

A Comparative Study of the Percentage of Gutta-Percha Filled Area of Three Thermal Gutta-Percha Canal Obturation Techniques

Three-Dimensional Measurement of Obturation Quality of Bioceramic Materials in Filling Artificial Internal Root Resorption Cavities Using Different Obturation Techniques: (An In Vitro Comparative Study)

A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of root canal filling with a single gutta-percha cone and calcium silicate sealer

Comparative evaluation of root filling after obturation with gutta-percha and 3 different sealers of minimally instrumented root canals of the maxillary second molar

Evaluation of root canal sealer filling quality using a single-cone technique in oval shaped canals: An In vitro Micro-CT study

Differences of Micro-CT evaluation of the obturation sealing capability between thermoplastic carrier-based condensing techniques and lateral heat condensation techniques

Performance of obturation techniques in anatomical irregularities located at different thirds of the root canal system

Comparative Evaluation of Three Access Cavity Preparation Techniques on Root Canal Instrumentation Using Micro-CT: An In Vitro Study

Comparison of sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus, and guttaflow in conservatively prepared curved root canals obturated with single-cone technique: An In vitro study

Comparative Study of Root Canal Morphology of Mandibular Incisors by Cone-Beam CT and Canal Staining and Clearing Technique

Evaluation of Apical Overfilling and Sealing with 4 Different Obturation Techniques in Oval-root Canals In Vitro