Ihde’s Pragmatism

Paul B. Thompson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35967-6_4

2020-01-01

Abstract:Anyone who has maintained a sustained philosophical relationship with Don Ihde that includes face-to-face interaction has probably heard him acknowledge a pragmatist bent in his thought. In Experiential Phenomenology: Multistabilities, Ihde characterizes postphenomenology as “pragmatism + phenomenology”; he also provides a brief critical discussion of John Dewey and Richard Rorty in his book Husserl’s Missing Technologies, and titles one chapter “Adding Pragmatism to Phenomenology.” These two late books publicize Ihde’s sympathy to pragmatism, and they respond to ways in which others working in the philosophy of technology have sought to link Ihde’s work to pragmatist philosophy. But there is still work to be done in exposing his pragmatist proclivities. This chapter (a) clarifies how pragmatism should be understood as a philosophical school of thought; (b) introduces and explicates how early pragmatists drew upon evolution to reformulate their approach to epistemology; (c) explains how the naturalism of this approach differs from the lingering idealism of Continental thinkers; and then (d) identifies the threads in Ihde’s work that are most indicative of these two characteristically pragmatist tendencies. The concluding section briefly recounts how this reading of Ihde takes postphenomenology beyond accounts that have been made by others working in the philosophy of technology, and establishes Ihde’s stature as a thinker who avoided some of the most costly philosophical blunders of the twentieth century.