Abstract:Relevance. The COVID-19 pandemic reveals the problem of moral choices for a large number of people: who should be treated first; who can be considered as a subject for urgent vaccines and drugs testing; choice between personal convenience and observation of restrictions for the sake of the “common good.” The objective of the study was to evaluate whether the stress experienced by people during the COVID-19 pandemic can change moral decision making. Materials and methods. The data of an online survey conducted from March 30 to May 31 (311 people) were analyzed. The survey included sociodemographic questions, questions about assessing one’s current condition, the Simptom Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), and the Moral Dilemmas Test, consisting of 30 dilemmas. The relationship of a number of utilitarian choices in personal moral dilemmas with sociodemographic characteristics, respondents’ assessments of their state and psychopathological characteristics was analyzed. Solving personal moral dilemmas was considered within subgroups of respondents with a high level of somatization and a high level of psychopathological symptoms and it was reviewed separately. Results. The results showed a high level of distress throughout the survey and an increase of utilitarian choices in personal moral dilemmas by the end of the survey. The number of choices in personal dilemmas was lower among older respondents, higher among men, and positively correlated with psychopathological symptoms. In the subgroup with a high level of somatization, personal choices slightly decreased by the end of the survey. On the contrary, in the subgroup with high levels of psychopathological symptoms, the number of personal choices significantly increased. Conclusions. Against the background of quarantine, assessments of moral standards change. The level of stress ambiguously affects moral decisions. A high level of somatization leads to a decrease in utilitarian personal choices, and a higher level of psychopathological symptoms leads to an increase in utilitarianш choices. Utilitarian personal choices are more often made by men and younger people

MORAL OUTRAGE AND SOCIAL DISTANCING: BAD OR BADLY INFORMED CITIZENS?

Physical distancing during the COVID‐19 crisis: The roles of threat and moralization

‘Distancers’ and ‘non‐distancers’? The potential social psychological impact of moralizing COVID‐19 mitigating practices on sustained behaviour change

Political and community logics jointly affect 'social distancing' compliance

Social distancing compliance: A video observational analysis

How Vicarious Experiences Influence Non‐compliance with COVID‐19 Prevention Regulations

Misinformation on COVID-19 origin and its relationship with perception and knowledge about social distancing: A cross-sectional study

Moral decisions in the age of COVID-19: Your choices really matter

Moral panic about “covidiots” in Canadian newspaper coverage of COVID-19

Does knowledge matter? How a target's knowledge of their COVID‐19 infection during a violation of preventive policies affects perceived immorality and dehumanization

Keep your (social) distance: Pathogen concerns and social perception in the time of COVID-19

Prevention for oneself or others? Psychological and social factors that explain social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic

A dual‐angle exploration towards understanding lapses in COVID‐19 social responsibility

Using Descriptive and Injunctive Norms to Encourage COVID-19 Social Distancing and Vaccinations

"I think I might be a bit wobbly in my corona moral" - young people's moral functioning during the COVID-19 lockdown: A social representations approach

Moral decision-making and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic

Pandemic Culture Wars: Partisan Differences in the Moral Language of COVID-19 Discussions

Mitigating COVID-19 in a Nationally Representative UK Sample: Personal Abilities and Obligation to Obey the Law Shape Compliance with Mitigation Measures

Social influence matters: We follow pandemic guidelines most when our close circle does

MORAL DECISION-MAKING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Basic human values & compliance with government-recommended prosocial health behavior