Abstract:Performance-based evaluation criteria (PBEC) are vital for selecting high-quality suppliers and achieving a PPP procurement performance. Through theoretical and institutional analysis, we found that the selection of PBEC centered on operations depends on the discretion of the purchaser. However, in an emerging and transforming PPP market, many factors have affected the scientific exercise of the purchaser’s discretion. This means that PPP projects must focus on construction and neglect operation in a certain period. Furthermore, to explore the influencing factors of the definition of PBEC, based on data of 9082 PPP projects between 2009 and 2021 in China, we adopted Ordinary Least Squares to empirically analyze two factors that influence the level of attention that is paid to the operation plan: corruption and accountability. The results indicate that the attention paid to the operation plan significantly increased with the reduction in corruption and the improvement in accountability. Robustness tests demonstrate the robustness of the results. A further heterogeneity analysis shows that the above factors have a more significant impact on non-state demonstration projects and projects with large investments. The contributions of this study are as follows: (1) Theoretically, this paper supplements the relevant research on evaluation criteria and provides new evidence on the impact of corruption and accountability on the defining PBEC. (2) Institutionally, it provides specific paths to limit the discretion of procurement officials when defining evaluation criteria. (3) In practice, it helps procurement officials to scientifically define PBEC and promote the realization of procurement performance.

Do Firms Manipulate Earnings after Winning Public-Private Partnership Bids? Evidence from China

An Analysis on the Earning Management of Public Companies with Accounting Estimate Changes

Is the Squeaky Wheel Getting the Grease? Earnings Management and Government Subsidies

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

The Impact of Auditor Switch on Private Sector’s Financial Constraints during the Implementation of the PPP Contract: Empirical Analysis Based on PSM-DID Model

Anti-corruption, Political Connections and Corporate Responses: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Using Available‐for‐sale Securities to Smooth Earnings: Evidence from China

Public-private partnership effect on the company technology innovation-empirical and theory: evidence from China

Institutional Investors and Earnings Management Associated with Controlling Shareholders' Promises: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Corruption, accountability, and discretion of procurement officials: An analysis of selection Preferences for Performance-based Evaluation Criteria (PBEC) in PPP procurement

Earnings Management and the Accrual Anomaly: Evidence from China

Earnings Management to Tunnel: Evidence from China's Listed Companies

Are State-Owned Enterprises Equally Reliable Information Suppliers? An Examination of the Impacts of State Ownership on Earnings Management Strategies of Chinese Enterprises

Earnings Management, Underwriter Reputation, and Marketization: Evidence from IPO Market in China

Empirical Study on Influence of PPP Mode on Financial Performance of Public Utility

Effect of promotion pressure and financial burden on investment in public–private partnership infrastructure projects in China

Information Disclosure and Earnings Management around Privatization of State Shares

Public Investment As Downward Benefit Distribution: Theory and Evidence from China’s Public–private Partnership Programs

Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective

Earnings Management, IPO Underpricing, and Post-Issue Stock Performance of Chinese SMEs

Earnings management at rights issues thresholds—Evidence from China☆