On the Uses and Disadvantages of the Arolsen Archives for History

Dan Stone
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110665376-003
2020-05-18
Abstract:The ITS digital collections are hugely revealing but also difficult to use and overwhelming in their size. Beginning by considering the disadvantages of ITS for historical research, I attend to the need for a critical approach that seeks to avoid the trap of positivism. Doing so puts the historian in a position to consider the uses of ITS. With a focus on the topics of sub-camps, death marches and liberation, this chapter shows that ITS can be used, with care, for the purposes of uncovering untold narratives and of discovering information about little- known sites and experiences of the Holocaust about which one finds out little by relying only or primarily on documents created by the perpetrators. The ITS collections, in other words, allow one to follow the trajectories of individuals and to situate them into bigger patterns of Nazi criminality. This social history of the Holocaust, or Nazism from the perspective of its victims, is one of ITS’s main advantages and it provides an important counterpart to a perpetrator-centric narrative. The latter is no less necessary for understanding the pattern of Nazi crimes, but for a rounded history (or an integrated history), one which is attuned to the effects of the crimes on the victims as well as to the mechanics of the crimes, ITS is indispensable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?