Abstract:Scholars in the humanities rely on carefully-constructed prose to convey ideas, while many in the sciences deploy numerical precision instead. Although university administrators often tout multi- or inter-discipinarity, it is unclear whether there is a deep understanding of how these modes of investigation are different, and how those differences might be accommodated and supported. For example, the disciplines that use numbers as a chief mode of expression were from the beginning conceived, embodied with and configured for external assessment as part of their claims to authority. As a consequence, their metrics were not designed to assess other kinds of scholarship such as that of the arts and the humanities. And, read in the opposite direction, the fact that the humanities were never customised for those numerical-based controls should not be understood as a failing of the discipline, but as an integral dimension of its distinct practice. This contribution offers a study of documentary form in the academy. The discussion will examine how scholarship in different fields came to have different formal features. It will furthermore consider what the implications of these differences are for how the disciplines are now seen and assessed. By looking to the history and traditions of different forms of scholarship, this chapter seeks to offer insight into the current debates about how productivity and impact are to be defined, marked and assessed in the academy. This chapter introduces the possibility that humanistic research might be expressed in word or wood and investigates the consequences of such a provocation. It concerns itself with select dimensions of scholarly publication that are especially apparent from a perspective across wood and word-among them, peer review, assessment, dissemination, citation and ownership. Under the intensifying exigencies of documentation, components of the written document that were once provisional become obligatory and codified through practice. The foregoing discussion of a historically informed experiment in academic publishing raises for consideration how specific practices of knowledge have been legitimised over time. The moments of friction encountered by the Cabinet, Box and Article provide clues about how certain forms of knowledge gain traction over time. Conceiving publications as unique performances of meaning may stimulate alternative strategies of assessment, interpretation and dissemination that are cognisant of—and work in concert with—the diverse forms at issue.

Documenting History, Historicizing Documentation: French Military Officials' Ethnological Reports on Cilicia

The History of Archives: The State of the Discipline

The Documentary Imagination in Twentieth-Century French Literature

Archives, Memories, and Masks in Writing the History of the French Resistance

Archives, Aesthetic Dimensions, and Academic Identity

Sites of memory: Discourses of the past in Israeli pioneering settlement museums

Documentary Sources of Museology: Reflections and Perspectives

Revisiting Robert Pagès: Documents and Culture

Editing Diplomatic Documents: A Review of Official U. S. and German Document Series

Between Lived and Archived Memory: How Digital Archives Can Tell History

Documentary historical analysis and bibliographic research: study subjects and methodology

In wood and word, or, a gloss on documents and documentation in the humanities

Dirty Documents and Illegible Signatures: Doctoring the Archive of British Imperialism and Decolonization

[The vertigo of discontinuity: on the use of history in Michel Foucault's archeology]

Archives of Military Courts in Colonial Congo: New Sources for the History of Violence and Agency in Central Africa

Artefacts of history: Events and the interpretation of images

Photographic Digital Heritage in Cultural Conflicts: A Critical Introduction

Digital archives in the cloud: Collective memory, institutional histories and the politics of information

Archives and Post-Colonial State-Sponsored History: A Dual State Approach Using the Case of the “Migrated Archives”

In the Unrest of Implication: Museum Education Methods in Atmospheres of Scandalization

Archiving Endangerment, Endangered Archives: Journeys through the Sound Archives of Americanist Anthropology and Linguistics, 1911-2016