Abstract:Background: Neurofeedback is a non-invasive brain training technique used to enhance and treat hyperactivity disorder by altering the patterns of brain activity. Nonetheless, the extent of enhancement by neurofeedback varies among individuals/patients and many of them are irresponsive to this treatment technique. Therefore, several studies have been conducted to predict the effectiveness of neurofeedback training including the theta/beta protocol with a specific emphasize on slow cortical potential (SCP) before initiating treatment, as well as examining SCP criteria according to age and sex criteria in diverse populations. While some of these studies failed to make accurate predictions, others have demonstrated low success rates. This study explores functional connections within various brain lobes across different frequency bands of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and the value of phase locking is used to predict the potential effectiveness of neurofeedback treatment before its initiation. Methods: This study utilized EEG data from the Mendelian database. In this database, EEG signals were recorded during neurofeedback sessions involving 60 hyperactive students aged 7-14 years, irrespective of sex. These students were categorized into treatable and non-treatable. The proposed method includes a five-step algorithm. Initially, the data underwent preprocessing to reduce noise using a multi-stage filtering process. The second step involved extracting alpha and beta frequency bands from the preprocessed EEG signals, with a particular emphasis on the EEG recorded from sessions 10 to 20 of neurofeedback therapy. In the third step, the method assessed the disparity in brain signals between the two groups by evaluating functional relationships in different brain lobes using the phase lock value, a crucial data characteristic. The fourth step focused on reducing the feature space and identifying the most effective and optimal electrodes for neurofeedback treatment. Two methods, the probability index (p-value) via a t-test and the genetic algorithm, were employed. These methods showed that the optimal electrodes were in the frontal lobe and central cerebral cortex, notably channels C3, FZ, F4, CZ, C4, and F3, as they exhibited significant differences between the two groups. Finally, in the fifth step, machine learning classifiers were applied, and the results were combined to generate treatable and non-treatable labels for each dataset. Results: Among the classifiers, the support vector machine and the boosting method demonstrated the highest accuracy when combined. Consequently, the proposed algorithm successfully predicted the treatability of individuals with hyperactivity in a short time and with limited data, achieving an accuracy of 90.6% in the neurofeedback method. Additionally, it effectively identified key electrodes in neurofeedback treatment, reducing their number from 32 to 6. Conclusions: This study introduces an algorithm with a 90.6% accuracy for predicting neurofeedback treatment outcomes in hyperactivity disorder, significantly enhancing treatment efficiency by identifying optimal electrodes and reducing their number from 32 to 6. The proposed method enables the prediction of patient responsiveness to neurofeedback therapy without the need for numerous sessions, thus conserving time and financial resources.

EEG data processing in ADHD diagnosis and neurofeedback

Impact of EEG biofeedback on event-related potentials (ERPs) in attention-deficit hyperactivity (ADHD) children

EEG spectral analysis of attention in ADHD: implications for neurofeedback training?

Neurofeedback Training Protocol Based on Selecting Distinctive Features to Treat or Reduce ADHD Symptoms

Electrophysiological correlates of improved executive function following EEG neurofeedback in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Refining ADHD diagnosis with EEG: The impact of preprocessing and temporal segmentation on classification accuracy

EEG Connectivity in ADHD Compared to a Normative Database: A Cohort Analysis of 120 Subjects from the ICAN Study

Comparative analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data gathered from the frontal region with other brain regions affected by attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) through multiresolution analysis and machine learning techniques

EEG Data Quality: Determinants and Impact in a Multicenter Study of Children, Adolescents, and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Quantitative EEG in Children and Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

EEG Neurofeedback Training Among Adult with Attention Deficit: A Review Article

Neurofeedback treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in adults

Learned self-regulation of EEG frequency components affects attention and event-related brain potentials in humans

Neurofeedback treatment experimental study for ADHD by using the brain-computer interface neurofeedback system

Utilizing Phase Locking Value to Determine Neurofeedback Treatment Responsiveness in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

A Study on Resting EEG Effective Connectivity Difference Before and after Neurofeedback for Children with ADHD

Optimized Complex Network Method (OCNM) for Improving Accuracy of Measuring Human Attention in Single-Electrode Neurofeedback System.

Effects on EEG Characteristics and Symptoms During Neurofeedback Training Processes for Children with ADHD

Computer Enabled Neuroplasticity Treatment: A Clinical Trial of a Novel Design for Neurofeedback Therapy in Adult ADHD

The Effects of Different Theta and Beta Neurofeedback Training Protocols on Cognitive Control in ADHD

Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder classification with EEG and machine learning