Abstract:A significant portion of diagnostic errors arises through cognitive errors resulting from inadequate knowledge, faulty data gathering, and/or faulty verification. Experts estimate that 75% of diagnostic failures can be attributed to clinician diagnostic thinking failure. The cognitive processes that underlie diagnostic thinking of clinicians are complex and intriguing, and it is imperative that clinicians acquire explicit appreciation and application of different cognitive approaches to make decisions better. A dual-process model that unifies many theories of decision-making has emerged as a promising template for understanding how clinicians think and judge efficiently in a diagnostic reasoning process. The identification and implementation of strategies for decreasing or preventing such diagnostic errors has become a growing area of interest and research. Suggested strategies to decrease diagnostic error incidence include increasing clinician's clinical expertise and avoiding inherent cognitive errors to make decisions better. Implementing Interventions focused solely on avoiding errors may work effectively for patient safety issues such as medication errors. Addressing cognitive errors, however, requires equal effort on expanding the individual clinician's expertise. Providing cognitive support to clinicians for robust diagnostic decision-making serves as the final strategic target for decreasing diagnostic errors. Clinical guidelines and algorithms offer another method for streamlining decision-making and decreasing likelihood of cognitive diagnostic errors. Addressing cognitive processing errors is undeniably the most challenging task in reducing diagnostic errors. While many suggested approaches exist, they are mostly based on theories and sciences in cognitive psychology, decision-making, and education. The proposed interventions are primarily suggestions and very few of them have been tested in the actual practice settings. Collaborative research effort is required to effectively address cognitive processing errors. Researchers in various areas, including patient safety/quality improvement, decision-making, and problem solving, must work together to make medical diagnosis more reliable.

Reducing the Risk of Diagnostic Error in the COVID-19 Era

Protecting Patients by Reducing Diagnostic Error

The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care

Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis

Toward the eradication of medical diagnostic errors

AggR, a transcriptional activator of aggregative adherence fimbria I expression in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli

Precise Decision-Making and Adaptive Response Strategies Based on the Situations of Stress During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Hospital commitments to address diagnostic errors: An assessment of 95 US hospitals

Will the hidden specter of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) emerge from the avalanche of COVID-19?

Minimizing the Risk of Diagnostic Errors in Acute Care for Older Adults: An Interdisciplinary Patient Safety Challenge

Diagnostic stewardship and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: Lessons learned for prevention of emerging infectious diseases in acute-care settings

COVID-19 Diagnostics: Past, Present, and Future

Diagnostic error in mental health: a review

SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the COVID-19 Pandemic Emergency: The Importance of Diagnostic Methods

Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence

How the COVID-19 pandemic will change the future of critical care

"What Else Could It Be?" A Scoping Review of Questions for Patients to Ask Throughout the Diagnostic Process

COVID-19 in differential diagnosis of online symptom assessments

Patient safety and the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of perspectives of front-line clinicians

False-positive and false-negative COVID-19 cases: respiratory prevention and management strategies, vaccination, and further perspectives

Unravelling the diagnostic methodologies for SARS-CoV-2; the Indispensable need for developing point-of-care testing