Abstract:Background: China is generally regarded internationally as an "authoritarian" state. Traditional definitions have assigned many negative connotations surrounding the term of authoritarian. We realize that it might not be considered value-neutral in other countries. But authoritarian in the Chinese context emphasizes more on centralized decision making, collectivism, coordinating all activities of the nation, and public support, which is considered a value-neutral term. Therefore, it is adopted in this paper. We would like to clarify this. Authoritarian governance is considered an important mechanism for developing China's economy and solving social problems. The COVID-19 crisis is no exception. Most of the current research on crisis management and government crises focuses on advanced, democratic countries. However, the consequences of crisis management by authoritarian governments have not been fully appreciated. Although prior research has addressed authoritarian initiatives to manage crises in China, authoritarian interventions have rarely been theorized in public health emergencies. Methods: Based on a literature review and theoretical analysis, we use a descriptive and qualitative approach to assess public health policies and mechanisms from an authoritarian perspective in China. In light of the key events and intervention measures of China's government in response to COVID-19, the strategic practices of the Communist Party of China (CPC) to construct, embody, or set political goals through authoritarian intervention in public health crisis management are discussed. Results: China's government responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a comprehensive authoritarian intervention, notably by establishing a top-down leadership mechanism, implementing a resolute lockdown, rapidly establishing square cabin hospitals, enhancing cooperation between different government departments, mobilizing a wide range of volunteer resources, enforcing the use of health codes, imposing mandatory quarantine on those returning from abroad, and implementing city-wide nucleic acid testing. These measures ensured that China was able to contain the outbreak quickly and reflect on the unique role of the Chinese authoritarian system in responding to public health crises. Conclusions: Our paper contributes to expanding the existing understanding of the relationship between crisis management and authoritarian system. China's response to COVID-19 exemplifies the unique strengths of authoritarian institutions in public health crisis management, which is a helpful and practical tool to further enhance the CPC's political legitimacy. As a socialist model of crisis management with Chinese characteristics, it may offer desirable experiences and lessons for other countries still ravaged by the epidemic.

Performance Legitimacy and COVID-19: What are Citizens’ Expectations for Crisis Management in an Authoritarian State?

Government Trust in a Time of Crisis: Survey Evidence at the Beginning of the Pandemic in China

China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective

Seeking opportunities from crisis? China’s governance responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

Citizen Assessments of Government Actions in the COVID-19 Outbreak in China

Seeking Opportunities From Crisis? China'S Governance Responses To The Covid-19 Pandemic

Chinese Citizen Satisfaction with Government Performance during COVID-19

The more actions, the higher the performance evaluation? Evidence from the crisis management of COVID-19 in China

Strengthening the State through Crisis Management: Battles against the SARS and COVID-19 Pandemics in China

Public Expectations of Crisis Outcomes in the Social Media Era in China: A Communication-Mediated Psychological Mechanism

Organizational Appeals and Civic Voluntarism Survey Experimental Evidence from Pandemic-Era China

More Trust in Central Government during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Citizens' Emotional Reactions, Government Performance, and Trust in Governments

PERFORMANCE PUBLIC POLICY: CHINA IN COVID-19

New development: Administrative accountability and early responses during public health crises—lessons from Covid-19 in China

Strict COVID-19 Lockdown and Popular Regime Support in China

Conformity behavior in crises: evidence from the COVID-19 epidemic in China

Community Resilience Governance on Public Health Crisis in China

COVID-19 in China: Responses, Challenges and Implications for the Health System

Why do democracies respond differently to COVID-19? A comparison of the United States and South Korea

Balancing Act: How Do Local Governments Use Social Media in Crises?

Crisis governance, Chinese style: distinctive features of China’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic