Abstract:Background: China is generally regarded internationally as an "authoritarian" state. Traditional definitions have assigned many negative connotations surrounding the term of authoritarian. We realize that it might not be considered value-neutral in other countries. But authoritarian in the Chinese context emphasizes more on centralized decision making, collectivism, coordinating all activities of the nation, and public support, which is considered a value-neutral term. Therefore, it is adopted in this paper. We would like to clarify this. Authoritarian governance is considered an important mechanism for developing China's economy and solving social problems. The COVID-19 crisis is no exception. Most of the current research on crisis management and government crises focuses on advanced, democratic countries. However, the consequences of crisis management by authoritarian governments have not been fully appreciated. Although prior research has addressed authoritarian initiatives to manage crises in China, authoritarian interventions have rarely been theorized in public health emergencies. Methods: Based on a literature review and theoretical analysis, we use a descriptive and qualitative approach to assess public health policies and mechanisms from an authoritarian perspective in China. In light of the key events and intervention measures of China's government in response to COVID-19, the strategic practices of the Communist Party of China (CPC) to construct, embody, or set political goals through authoritarian intervention in public health crisis management are discussed. Results: China's government responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a comprehensive authoritarian intervention, notably by establishing a top-down leadership mechanism, implementing a resolute lockdown, rapidly establishing square cabin hospitals, enhancing cooperation between different government departments, mobilizing a wide range of volunteer resources, enforcing the use of health codes, imposing mandatory quarantine on those returning from abroad, and implementing city-wide nucleic acid testing. These measures ensured that China was able to contain the outbreak quickly and reflect on the unique role of the Chinese authoritarian system in responding to public health crises. Conclusions: Our paper contributes to expanding the existing understanding of the relationship between crisis management and authoritarian system. China's response to COVID-19 exemplifies the unique strengths of authoritarian institutions in public health crisis management, which is a helpful and practical tool to further enhance the CPC's political legitimacy. As a socialist model of crisis management with Chinese characteristics, it may offer desirable experiences and lessons for other countries still ravaged by the epidemic.

Strict COVID-19 Lockdown and Popular Regime Support in China

Government Trust in a Time of Crisis: Survey Evidence at the Beginning of the Pandemic in China

Pandemic Lockdowns and Trust in Local Government in China

China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective

Immediate and delayed psychological effects of province-wide lockdown and personal quarantine during the COVID-19 outbreak in China

Why they willingly complied: Ordinary people, the big environment, and the control of COVID-19 in China

Association between mental health and community support in lockdown communities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from rural China

Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan leads to a lasting increase in social distancing

China's Zero-Covid Policy and Psychological Distress: a Spatial Quasi-Experimental Design

Exploring Psychological Effects of Residential Lockdowns in China: A Study by Weibo Psycho-linguistic Analysis (Preprint)

Battle to Survive: The Association Between Accountability and Chinese Local Government Response to COVID-19

Psychological status of residents at the onset of nationwide COVID-19 lockdown in low- and medium-risk areas of China

Distinct Regimes of O3 Response to COVID-19 Lockdown in China

Effects of lockdowns in shaping socioeconomic behaviors

Lockdown Policies, Economic Support, and Mental Health: Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic in United States

Psychological Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown and Its Evolution: A Case Study Based on Internet Searching Data during the Lockdown of Wuhan 2020 and Shanghai 2022

Desire for Cultural Tightness: the Associated Between COVID-19 Infection Concern and Mental Health and Protective Behavior During- and Post-Covid-19 Lockdown in China

Risk perception, compliance with COVID-19 measures, and the role of social media after China's lockdown lift

Lockdown and psychological stress in Wuhan, China

The role of collectivism, liberty, COVID fatigue, and fatalism in public support for the zero-COVID policy and relaxing restrictions in China

Testing influences of openness, conscientiousness, nationalism, media diversity, social class, and informational echo chambers on support for official responses to COVID-19 in Wuhan in November, 2020