Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal pricing, carbon emission reduction (CER), green marketing efforts (GME) and utility of supply chain members in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. First, three basic models that consider the manufacturer's different attitudes toward the retailer's fairness concern are constructed. The optimal decisions of these models are obtained. Second, these optimal solutions are compared, and the effects of some key parameters including fairness concern on the optimal decisions and utility are examined for the three models. Furthermore, the manufacturer may misestimate the retailer's fairness concern; therefore, an extended model is proposed. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt the manufacturer-led Stackelberg game theoretic framework, where the manufacturer decides the wholesale price and CER level and, then, the retailer determines the retail price and GME. Findings The results show that fairness concern has a negative impact on the wholesale price, the level of CER and GME, and fairness concern are not always beneficial for maximizing utility, although it is related to whether the manufacturer pays attention to the retailer's fairness concern. The manufacturer will gain more utility when considering the fairness concern of retailers than non-consideration. Overestimating or underestimating the fairness concern of the retailers does not lead to benefits for the manufacturer. Research limitations/implications This study has the following two limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the authors only consider the fairness concern of a single retailer but not peer-induced fairness among multiple competing retailers, which can be taken into account in future studies. Second, the demand function is linearly related to price, CER and GME. Because of the uncertainty of market information, the uncertainty demand function can be further considered. Originality/value This paper simultaneously considers the factors CER, GME and fairness concern. The utility function of the retailer is established according to taking the Nash bargaining solution as a fairness reference point, and four different models are constructed and compared.

Decisions and coordination of green e-commerce supply chain considering green manufacturer's fairness concerns

Supply chain decision-making of green products considering a retailer's fairness concerns under a pre-sale model

Dual-Channel Supply Chain Coordination Considering Green and Service Inputs

Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns

Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination considering CSR and Consumer Green Preferences

Research on Supply Chain Decision-making Considering Fairness Concerns and Green Technology Innovation

Participant fairness concern and cost‐sharing‐based dual‐channel low‐carbon supply chain management

The coordination mechanism of a risk-averse green supply chain

Logistics service decision for e-commerce supply chain with fairness concern under uncertain environment

Green Supply Chain Game: Decision-Making and Coordination Mechanism Design

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Decision and Coordination of Low-Carbon E-Commerce Supply Chain with Government Carbon Subsidies and Fairness Concerns

Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers' Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference

Optimal Green Degree and Pricing Decisions of the E-Tailer and Supplier With Alternative Choices

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

A Green Supply Chain with Sales Effort under a Cost-Sharing Contract

Joint emission reduction dynamic optimization and coordination in the supply chain considering fairness concern and reference low-carbon effect

Analysis of green supply chains under fairness concern and differential power structure

Optimal Financing Strategy in a Capital-Constrained Supply Chain with Retailer Green Marketing Efforts

Pricing strategies and profit coordination under a double echelon green supply chain

Product pricing, green effort decisions and coordination in a dynamic three-echelon green supply chain