Abstract:According to mindset theory, students who believe their personal characteristics can change-that is, those who hold a growth mindset-will achieve more than students who believe their characteristics are fixed. Proponents of the theory have developed interventions to influence students' mindsets, claiming that these interventions lead to large gains in academic achievement. Despite their popularity, the evidence for growth mindset intervention benefits has not been systematically evaluated considering both the quantity and quality of the evidence. Here, we provide such a review by (a) evaluating empirical studies' adherence to a set of best practices essential for drawing causal conclusions and (b) conducting three meta-analyses. When examining all studies (63 studies, N = 97,672), we found major shortcomings in study design, analysis, and reporting, and suggestions of researcher and publication bias: Authors with a financial incentive to report positive findings published significantly larger effects than authors without this incentive. Across all studies, we observed a small overall effect: d¯ = 0.05, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.09], which was nonsignificant after correcting for potential publication bias. No theoretically meaningful moderators were significant. When examining only studies demonstrating the intervention influenced students' mindsets as intended (13 studies, N = 18,355), the effect was nonsignificant: d¯ = 0.04, 95% CI = [-0.01, 0.10]. When examining the highest-quality evidence (6 studies, N = 13,571), the effect was nonsignificant: d¯ = 0.02, 95% CI = [-0.06, 0.10]. We conclude that apparent effects of growth mindset interventions on academic achievement are likely attributable to inadequate study design, reporting flaws, and bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Mindset Messaging: Fostering Student Support and Confidence through Micro-Messaging in Advisor Communication

Towards fostering growth mindset classrooms: identifying teaching behaviors that signal instructors’ fixed and growth mindsets beliefs to students

Instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors: How do students and instructors perceive them?

How Perceptions of Obstacles, Stress, and Different Mindsets May Impact a Student’s Self-Beliefs

Teacher Mindsets Help Explain Where a Growth-Mindset Intervention Does and Doesn’t Work

Growth mindset intervention among French university students, and its articulation with proactive coping strategies

Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement

Do growth mindset interventions impact students' academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices.

Encouraging Student Sense of Belonging Through Instructor Face Support

Students Who Perceive Instructors to Have a Fixed Mindset Report a Greater Sense of Academic Misfit That Leads to Lower Chemistry Grades

More Than Growth Mindset: Individual and Interactive Links Among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adolescents’ Ability Mindsets, Metacognitive Skills, and Math Engagement

Supporting Students on the (Academic) Margins: An Equity-Driven Framework

To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses

Mindsets as sources of L2 speaking anxiety and self-confidence: the case of international teaching assistants in the U.S.

Mindsets in language learning and teaching: an introduction to the special issue

“Does My Teacher Believe I Can Improve?”: The Role of Meta-Lay Theories in ESL Learners’ Mindsets and Need Satisfaction

Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school.

Growth-Mindset Intervention Delivered by Teachers Boosts Achievement in Early Adolescence

Shifting the mindset culture to address global educational disparities

How do growth mindsets contribute to academic engagement in L2 classes? The mediating and moderating roles of the L2 motivational self system

A growth-theory-of-interest intervention increases interest in math and science coursework among liberal arts undergraduates.