The most similar predictor – on selecting measurement locations for wind resource assessment

Andreas Bechmann,Juan Pablo M. Leon,Bjarke T. Olsen,Yavor V. Hristov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2020-82
2020-06-18
Abstract:Abstract. We present the most similar-method for conducting wind resource assessments with multiple wind measurements and for the optimal design of measurement campaigns. Wind resource assessment is generally done by extrapolating a measured and long-term corrected wind climate at one location to a new location using a flow model. If several measurement locations are available, standard industry practice is to make a weighted average of all the predictions using inverse-distance weighting. The most similar-method challenges this practice. Instead of weighting several predictions, the method only selects the measurement location evaluated most similar. We validate the new approach by comparing against measurements from 185 met masts from 40 wind farm sites and show improvements compared to inverse-distance weighting. Compared to using the closest measurement location, the error of power density predictions is reduced by 13 % using inverse-distance weighting and 34 % using the most similar-method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?