Abstract:Purpose This study aims to assess National Health Service (NHS) decision-making protocols during the pandemic, with two primary objectives: (1) to establish whether decision-making protocols changed during the pandemic and (2) to evaluate if these changes could inform future decision-making strategies beyond the pandemic. By focusing on the shift from traditional to emergency decision-making processes, this research seeks to derive actionable insights for enhancing policy and practice in crisis conditions. Design/methodology/approach We employ a mixed-methods approach, gathering data through an online survey targeted at senior NHS decision-makers involved in the pandemic response. Our survey collected quantitative and qualitative data to assess changes in decision-making protocols. The analysis included statistical techniques to quantify changes and thematic analysis to explore their implications, providing a detailed understanding of decision-making adaptations during the crisis and their potential future impact. Findings Our findings clarify the role of the NHS values and constitution, which prioritize patient welfare, dignity and equitable access to healthcare, guiding all decision-making. During the pandemic, the urgency to respond swiftly necessitated modifications to these guiding principles. Traditional processes were adapted, allowing for more rapid decision-making while still aligning with the core values, effectively balancing immediate response needs with long-term healthcare commitments. Research limitations/implications Our research contributes to decision-making under crisis conditions within a healthcare context and brings together a theoretical background which has accommodated the development of models and approaches that can be utilized by both service and manufacturing organizations. In addition, we have sought to bring together the importance of decision-making protocols under crisis conditions using observations from respondents who experienced decision-making at a senior level prior, during and beyond the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has assisted in the models developed in this paper. In addition, our empirical research demonstrates the importance that the values of the organization have upon decision-making and how such values need to be adjusted in the light of crisis operations. Practical implications Our research provides insightful observations relating to the pressures upon decision-making protocols under crisis conditions and provides senior decision-makers with an approach to realigning values to cope with unusual and highly pressurized operating environments. Notably, there is a clear requirement for decision-makers to communicate clearly to staff the need to temporarily alter the modus operandi to reflect crisis operations. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to explore decision-making in the NHS during a pandemic and to clearly demonstrate how such decision-making needs to be adapted to reflect the nature and scope of delivering a complex healthcare service under crisis conditions.

Covid-19: Refracting decision-making through the prism of resource allocation

Decision-making among the Substitute Decision Makers in Intensive Care Units: an Investigation of Decision Control Preferences and Decisional Conflicts

Decision-making under crisis: insights from the health service sector

An ethical analysis of clinical triage protocols and decision-making frameworks: what do the principles of justice, freedom, and a disability rights approach demand of us?

Critical Medical Resource Allocation during COVID-19 Pandemic

Game Theory-Based Decision Making for the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the COVID-19 Situation

Rationing in an Era of Multiple Tight Constraints: Is Cost-Utility Analysis Still Fit for Purpose?

Decisions on the allocation of intensive care resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic : Clinical and ethical recommendations of DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGIIN, DGNI, DGP, DGP and AEM

Epidemic Control and Resource Allocation: Approaches and Implications for the Management of COVID-19

COVID-19 Pandemic Healthcare Resource Allocation, Age and Frailty

Clinical decision-making process and distributive justice: The mediating role of economic analysis. Empirical evidence from Italy

The Right to Health and Resource Allocation. Who Gets What and Why in the COVID-19 Pandemic

[Decisions on the allocation of intensive care resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic : Clinical and ethical recommendations of DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGIIN, DGNI, DGP, DGP and AEM. German version]

Decision Engineering in Healthcare: How Medical Professionals Prioritize Resource Distribution

Decision Conflicts in Clinical Care during COVID-19: A Multi-Perspective Inquiry

Capacity Management in a Pandemic with Endogenous Patient Choices and Flows

Equitable resource allocation in health emergencies: addressing racial disparities and ethical dilemmas

Decision Making in a Strategic Medical Command and Control Team During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study

Bracing for the next wave: A critical incident study of frontline decision‐making, adaptation and learning in ambulance care during COVID‐19

Operational Recommendations for Scarce Resource Allocation in a Public Health Crisis

Effective decision-making in public health organizations: reference to the COVID-19 pandemic