Abstract:Purpose Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, most organizations have experienced a sudden and unprecedented drop in revenue and productivity. However, the pandemic did not exclusively negatively impact organizations; rather, it resulted in both negative and positive effects. To delve into the multi-level process through which organizational outcomes change from negative to positive indicators, this study focuses on organizational resilience as a theoretical concept to overcome pandemic-related turmoil. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a multi-level analysis based on grounded theory with a sample of 30 healthcare employees who worked in hospitals and were simultaneously enrolled in a part-time master of business administration (MBA) program at a university in the Midwest. Of the 30 participants, 21 were from a single university hospital (UH), and the remaining 9 participants were from other hospitals (non-UH). Findings The authors analyzed the data and incorporated three existing perspectives of organizational resilience (attribute, process and multi-level views) into an integrated model. The authors identified 25 first-order concepts and 8 second-order themes and categorized them into 4 aggregate dimensions at different unit levels: organizational field, leadership, operation and individual units. Practical implications A resilient hospital operates as a cohesive system, with entities at various levels – from individuals and teams to the broader organization – collaborating seamlessly to foster resilience. Top management team (TMT) should persistently communicate with employees to provide information about the current crisis and clear strategic directions to reduce employees' fear and prevent anomie stemming from future uncertainty. Managers should not only be concerned about employees' physical safety from infection and psychological safety from isolation but also encourage employees to elicit meaningfulness from their work. Furthermore, TMT and human resource (HR) teams should adapt human resource management (HRM) practices to allow for flexibility and optimism in employee roles. Originality/value In this study, the authors utilized a qualitative methodology with grounded theory in order to develop a comprehensive model that holds theoretical, methodological and practical significance. Theoretically, the authors' novelty lies in the synthesis of three distinct perspectives: attribute, process and multi-level. The authors merged these approaches into a unified model, identifying precursors of resilience at different levels. Methodologically, the authors focused on hospitals as target samples, which were the foremost and representative organizations severely confronting the crisis and turmoil brought by the pandemic. The authors documented organizations' experiences amidst the crisis as they unfolded in real time rather than in hindsight. This approach highlights the immediacy and significance of the authors' research in the realm of crisis management. Practically, the authors' findings illuminate that organizational resilience can be developed through a collaborative effort. It emerges from coordinated interactions across various organizational actors, from employees and middle managers to the TMT.

Decision Making in a Strategic Medical Command and Control Team During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study

Bracing for the next wave: A critical incident study of frontline decision‐making, adaptation and learning in ambulance care during COVID‐19

Decision-making under crisis: insights from the health service sector

Effective decision-making in public health organizations: reference to the COVID-19 pandemic

Healthcare Decision-Making in a Crisis: A Qualitative Systemic Review Protocol

Precise Decision-Making and Adaptive Response Strategies Based on the Situations of Stress During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

"Building the plane while flying it" Reflections on pandemic preparedness and response; an organisational case study

Singapore's COVID-19 crisis decision-making through centralization, legitimacy, and agility: an empirical analysis

Decision Conflicts in Clinical Care during COVID-19: A Multi-Perspective Inquiry

Building resilience: analysis of health care leaders' perspectives on the Covid-19 response in Region Stockholm

Decision-Making Prepandemic: University Curtailment of Academic Operations Closure Processes During the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak

No man is an island: management of the emergency response to the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak in a large public decentralised service delivery organisation

Political Decision Making in the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Germany from the Perspective of Risk Management

Data-Driven Decision Making in COVID-19 Response: A Survey

Decision Making in Health Management during Crisis: A Case Study Based on Epidemiological Curves of China and Italy against COVID-19

Organizational resilience: leadership, operational and individual responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

Identifying factors that nurses consider in the decision-making process related to patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic

The Role of Leadership and Decision-Making under Crisis: A bibliometric analysis and scientific evolution from 1962 to 2020

Multi-criteria decision-making for coronavirus disease 2019 applications: a theoretical analysis review

Ethical decision making during a healthcare crisis: a resource allocation framework and tool

Rise of Multiattribute Decision‐making in Combating COVID‐19: A Systematic Review of the State‐of‐the‐art Literature