Abstract:Although neurosciences have made notable progress in theory and technology, a significant methodological issue persists with the continued reliance on homogeneous sample groups (Burns et al., 2019). This observation is neither new nor recent, as several authors have already raised concerns about the fact that behavioral scientists base their conclusions mostly on samples composed almost exclusively of people from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies, even though these groups are very peculiar, representing only 12% of all humans and may be considered outliers (Henrich et al., 2010). The problem is exacerbated by the frequent use of convenience samples, which tend to consist primarily of university students, resulting in a narrower demographic range that fails to represent the broader diversity within society. The inclusion of more diverse populations is crucial, notably in light of the nature versus nurture debate. It is indeed now widely accepted that both cultural and biological factors contribute to shaping human psychology and behaviors (Chiao and Ambady, 2007). However, the lack of diversity in population samples diminishes the impact of cultural (nurture) factors in the obtained results and makes it difficult to claim whether neurocognitive processes are universal or culture specific (Burns et al., 2019). Beyond cultural differences, the lack of access to diverse populations can hinder the exploration of innovative research questions in the field, which may require targeting specific populations that use, for instance, different metric systems, have unique hierarchical structures, or have experienced a unique historical event. A critical question thus remains: Why does the pursuit of greater diversity in population samples remain so limited? Part of the answer is undoubtedly tied to the unequal distribution of funding and the number of scientists in specific parts of the world who lack the resources to conduct research ... Correspondence should be addressed to Emilie A. Caspar at emilie.caspar{at}ugent.be.

How USA-Centric Is Psychology? An Archival Study of Implicit Assumptions of Generalizability of Findings to Human Nature Based on Origins of Study Samples

WEIRD–Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology’s evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation.

Social Judgments from Faces Are Universal

How WEIRD is Usable Privacy and Security Research? (Extended Version)

Psychology Is a Property of Persons, Not Averages or Distributions: Confronting the Group-to-Person Generalizability Problem in Experimental Psychology

Culture and Attention: Future Directions to Expand Research Beyond the Geographical Regions of WEIRD Cultures

Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the Modern West: Toward the globalizing of psychology.

Guidelines for Inclusive and Diverse Human Neuroscience Research Practices

Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.

Diversity in Psychological Research Activities: Quantitative Approach With Topic Modeling

Human Life History Dimensions in Reproductive Strategies Are Intuitive Across Cultures

Dismantling Racism in Research Methods and Practices

Cultural Bias in Explainable AI Research: A Systematic Analysis

WEIRD FAccTs: How Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic is FAccT?

Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance

Cross-cultural, developmental psychology: Integrating approaches and key insights

Most Psychological Researchers Assume Their Samples Are Ergodic: Evidence From a Year of Articles in Three Major Journals

The Myth of the Need for Diversity Among Subjects in Theory-Testing Research: Comments on "Racial Inequality in Psychological Research" by Roberts et al. (2020)

Objectivity interrogation of racial scholarship in psychology and management

A WEIRD Theory? On the Prevalence of Western Folk Theory of Social Change in the West and Asia