Abstract:Background. Teachers' ideas about aggression and deviant behavior of adolescents is an extremely important source of information, scientific consideration of which can both clarify the internal picture of the difficulties in teachers' professional activities and assess the specifics of the manifestation of problematic behavior in adolescents. Objective. The purpose of this article is a theoretical and empirical consideration of the phenomenology of aggressive behavior in adolescents as represented in teachers’ ideas. Another goal is to identify the main lexical units with which occur in the conceptualization of typical manifestations of aggressive behavior in adolescence. Methods. The article analyses teacher’s answers to the open question: "What are the three most typical manifestations of aggressive behavior in adolescents?" The question was asked separately about younger (11–14 years old) and older (15–19 years old) teenagers. To analyze the data obtained, the methodology of text analysis by means of the R programming language was applied, The methodology included several stages: (1) tokenization of statements, (2) stemmization of words, (3) removal of stop words for the Russian language, (4) sorting meaningful parts of words by frequency of use. To determine the differences in the frequency of use for different lexical units, the Student and Mann ⸻ Whitney criteria were used. Sample. The study was implemented in the form of an anonymous online survey, which was filled in by teachers from five federal districts of the Russian Federation. The overwhelming majority of respondents are female (94 %). The average age of respondents is 44.5 (SD = 11.7). A sample of 5,728 teachers was used for the analysis. Results. The most frequent lexical unit was "aggress"[aggression] in both groups. In the representations of teachers regarding younger adolescents, there are also lexical units and their components: «krik» [scream], «drak» [fight], «grub» [rude], «poveden» [behavior], «fizichesk» [physical], «emocionaln» [emotional] and «slez» [tears/crying]. In relation to the older teenagers «poveden» [behavior], «grub» [rude], «drak» [fight], «fizichesk» [physical] and «zamknut» [withdrawn] are used. Conclusion. The study identified the most frequent lexical units and their components used by teachers to describe aggressive behavior in younger and older adolescents. It was shown that the most frequent units and their components reflect typical manifestations characteristic of both ages. At the same time, the least frequent seem to indicate the specific risks characteristic of the age groups considered.

It's not just what you say, it's how you say it too. Adolescents' hostile attribution of intent and emotional responses to social comments

Hostile attribution bias in children and adolescents

Attributional style in aggressive adolescent boys

An Experimental Investigation of Peer Influences on Adolescent Hostile Attributions

Fast and friendly: The role of vocal cues in adolescents' responses to and perceptions of peer provocation

Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups.

Aggression and hostile attribution bias among juvenile offenders and high school students

Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context

Analyze This! Thematic Analysis: Hostility, Attribution of Intent, and Interpersonal Perception Bias

Hostile Intent Attribution and Aggressive Behavior in Children Revisited: A Meta‐Analysis

Can Self-Persuasion Reduce Hostile Attribution Bias in Young Children?

Chinese Adolescents’ Social Status Goals

The relationship between trait anger and reactive aggressive behavior in middle school students: the mediating role and intervention of hostile attribution bias

A comparison of the role of aggression in the association between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features between young offenders and university students.

Hostile attributions and behavioral strategies in children: Does relationship type matter?

Associations of preschoolers’ language skills with aggressive behaviour, positive peer relations, and the hostile intent attribution from preschool to early adolescence

Anger and hostility in adolescents: relationships with self-reported attachment style and perceived parental rearing styles

Does Parent-Child Discussion of Peer Provocations Reduce Young Children's Hostile Attributional Bias?

The Relationship Between Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia With Hostile Attribution Bias and Anger in in Adolescent Boys With High Bullying: a Path Analysis

Maternal supportive responses to adolescents' negative emotions serve as protective factors for adolescents' hostile attribution bias longitudinally

Adolescents’ Aggressive Behavior in the Representation of Teachers: Typical Manifestations (Semantic Analysis)