Abstract:BACKGROUND Antisocial personality features in adolescents are frequently associated with delinquency and constitute the problem that most concerns the criminal justice system and the public. Hostile interpretation bias has been identified as a candidate for explaining emergent adolescent antisocial personality problems and aggression, but it is unclear whether offenders and non-offenders show differences in the relationships between hostile interpretation bias, aggression and antisocial personality features. AIMS To compare relationships between hostile interpretation bias and a personality measure between incarcerated teenagers and first year university students and to explore aggression and criminal history as mediating or moderating variables. METHODS Fifty-three 16-18-year-old incarcerated male offenders and 69 17-20-year-old male university students were recruited, the former through institutional staff and the latter by online advert only. Individuals in both groups self-rated, in private, on the Word and Sentence Association Paradigm-hostile (WSAP), The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Hostility Interpretation Bias Task (HIBT) as tests for hostile interpretation bias, and on the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire and on Hyler's Personality Disorder Questionnaire (PDQ-4). Among the students, criminal history was assessed by a self-reported binary question. LASSO regressions were used to test inter-relationships between hostile interpretation bias and aggression or antisocial personality traits. Mediation and moderation were tested using MPLUS 7.4. RESULTS The WSAP and AIHQ, as measures of self-reported hostility bias, had relationships with self-reported aggression (Pearson r 0.24-0.58, p < 0.001) and with antisocial personality features (r 0.36-0.50, p < 0.001), the HIBT did not. Aggression scores mediated the relationship between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features. Furthermore, the relationship between hostile interpretation bias and aggression was stronger among the young offenders (estimates 0.43-0.75) than among the university students without criminal history (estimates 0.13-0.36). CONCLUSIONS Hostile interpretation bias appears to promote antisocial personality features by increasing an individual's aggression, regardless of social status, although the effect was much stronger among the young offenders. To reduce young people's antisocial personality features, future studies should perhaps focus on evaluating strategies to reduce hostile bias or prevent it from being expressed in aggressive behaviours.

Attributional style in aggressive adolescent boys

It's not just what you say, it's how you say it too. Adolescents' hostile attribution of intent and emotional responses to social comments

Hostile attribution bias in children and adolescents

Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context

Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups.

Chinese Adolescents’ Social Status Goals

Is It Bad to Be Good? An Exploration of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior Subtypes in Adolescence

A measure of attributions for peer victimization: psychometric properties and differences among bullying roles

Analyze This! Thematic Analysis: Hostility, Attribution of Intent, and Interpersonal Perception Bias

Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type

Attributional and attentional patterns in the perception of ambiguous harmful encounters involving peer and authority figures

Hostile attributions and behavioral strategies in children: Does relationship type matter?

Translational science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems

An Experimental Investigation of Peer Influences on Adolescent Hostile Attributions

Anger and hostility in adolescents: relationships with self-reported attachment style and perceived parental rearing styles

Network analysis of trait aggression among community youths and juvenile offenders

A comparison of the role of aggression in the association between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features between young offenders and university students.

Relationship between Harsh Parenting and Aggressive Behaviors in Male Juvenile Delinquents: Potential Mediating Roles of Peer Victimization and Hostile Attribution Bias

Mediating Effect of Attributional Biases in the Impulsivity–Aggression Relationship Among Adolescents: Therapeutic Implications

Multidimensional profiles of Head Start children's social behaviors predict their interpretations of physical aggression

Disruptive behaviors, antisocial attitudes, and aggression in young offenders: Comparison of Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) typologies