Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Kanako Akamatsu,Takahide Ito,Masatoshi Miyamura,Yumiko Kanzaki,Koichi Sohmiya,Masaaki Hoshiga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-00205-2

2020-06-22

Cardiovascular Ultrasound

Abstract:Abstract Background Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-derived atrial electromechanical delay (AEMD) has been reported to be useful for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, its usefulness remains unknown when analyzed along with patients seemingly at high-risk for AF as controls. From this standpoint, we investigated whether AEMD would be of use for identifying patients with PAF. Methods We retrospectively analyzed TDI recordings to obtain AEMD in 63 PAF patients. Thirty-three patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (MRFs) but without history of AF and 50 healthy individuals served as disease and healthy controls, respectively. AEMD was defined as the time-interval between the electrocardiogram P-wave and the beginning of the spectral TDI-derived A’ for the septal (septal EMD) and lateral (lateral EMD) sides of the mitral annulus. Results There was no significant difference in the left atrial volume index between PAF patients and disease controls (28 ± 9 mL/m 2 vs. 27 ± 5 mL/m 2 ). PAF patients had longer AEMD, particularly for the lateral EMD (75 ± 23 ms), compared with disease (62 ± 22 ms, P = 0.009) and healthy (54 ± 24 ms, P < 0.001) controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the lateral EMD (OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.03–1.52, P = 0.023), along with the left atrial volume index (OR 2.25, 95%CI 1.44–3.51, P < 0.001), was one of the significant independent associates of identifying PAF patients. Conclusions This cross-sectional study indicates that even analyzed together with MRFs patients, AEMD remains useful for identifying patients at risk for AF. Our results need to be confirmed by a large-scale prospective study.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems