Abstract:Background Patient-specific gait and surgical variables are known to play an important role in wear of total hip replacements (THR). However a rigorous model, capable of predicting wear rate based on a comprehensive set of subject-specific gait and component-positioning variables, has to our knowledge, not been reported. Questions/purpose (1) Are there any differences between patients with high, moderate, and low wear rate in terms of gait and/or positioning variables? (2) Can we design a model to predict the wear rate based on gait and positioning variables? (3) Which group of wear factors (gait or positioning) contributes more to the wear rate? Patients and Methods Data on patients undergoing primary unilateral THR who performed a postoperative gait test were screened for inclusion. We included patients with a 28-mm metal head and a hip cup made of noncrosslinked polyethylene (GUR 415 and 1050) from a single manufacturer (Zimmer, Inc). To calculate wear rates from radiographs, inclusion called for patients with a series of standing radiographs taken more than 1 year after surgery. Further, exclusion criteria were established to obtain reasonably reliable and homogeneous wear readings. Seventy-three (83% of included) patients met all criteria, and the final dataset consisted of 43 males and 30 females, 69 ± 10 years old, with a BMI of 27.3 ± 4.7 kg/m2. Wear rates of these patients were determined based on the relative displacement of the femoral head with regard to the cup using a validated computer-assisted X-ray wear-analysis suite. Three groups with low (< 0.1 mm/year), moderate (0.1 to 0.2 mm/year), and high (> 0.2 mm/year) wear were established. Wear prediction followed a two-step process: (1) linear discriminant analysis to estimate the level of wear (low, moderate, or high), and (2) multiple linear and nonlinear regression modeling to predict the exact wear rate from gait and implant-positioning variables for each level of wear. Results There were no group differences for positioning and gait suggesting that wear differences are caused by a combination of wear factors rather than single variables. The linear discriminant analysis model correctly predicted the level of wear in 80% of patients with low wear, 87% of subjects with moderate wear, and 73% of subjects with high wear based on a combination of gait and positioning variables. For every wear level, multiple linear and nonlinear regression showed strong associations between gait biomechanics, implant positioning, and wear rate, with the nonlinear model having a higher prediction accuracy. Flexion-extension ROM and hip moments in the sagittal and transverse planes explained 42% to 60% of wear rate while positioning factors, (such as cup medialization and cup inclination angle) explained only 10% to 33%. Conclusion Patient-specific wear rates are associated with patients’ gait patterns. Gait pattern has a greater influence on wear than component positioning for traditional metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Clinical Relevance The consideration of individual gait bears potential to further reduce implant wear in THR. In the future, a predictive wear model may identify individual, modifiable wear factors for modern materials.

Enhanced In-Silico Polyethylene Wear Simulation of Total Knee Replacements During Daily Activities

An efficient and robust simulator for wear of total knee replacements

Simulating Wear On Total Knee Replacements

Computational Wear Prediction for Impact of Kinematics Boundary Conditions on Wear of Total Knee Replacement Using Two Cross-Shear Models

In vitro effects on mobile polyethylene insert under highly demanding daily activities: stair climbing

Total Hip Wear Assessment: A Comparison Between Computational and In Vitro Wear Assessment Techniques Using ISO 14242 Loading and Kinematics

Sensitivity of total knee replacement wear to variability in motion and load input: A parametric finite element analysis study

Estimation of two wear factors for total hip arthroplasty: A simulation study based on musculoskeletal modelling

Finite element evaluation of the newest ISO testing standard for polyethylene total knee replacement liners

Enhanced computational modelling of UHMWPE wear in total hip joint replacements: The role of frictional work and contact pressure

A New Method of In Vitro Wear Assessment of the UHMWPE Tibial Insert in Total Knee Replacement

Research on the Wear Performance of Artificial Knee Joint with Different Geometric Dimension

Elastohydrodynamic lubrication and wear modelling of the knee joint replacements with surface topography

Y-Tzp Zirconia Run Against Highly Crosslinked Uhmwpe Tibial Inserts: Knee Simulator Wear and Phase-Transformation Studies

A Patient-Specific Wear Prediction Framework for an Artificial Knee Joint with Coupled Musculoskeletal Multibody-Dynamics and Finite Element Analysis

Numerical wear study of metal‐on‐ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene‐based cervical total disc arthroplasty by coupling finite element analysis and multi‐body dynamics

Computational wear of knee implant polyethylene insert surface under continuous dynamic loading and posterior tibial slope variation based on cadaver experiments with comparative verification

Prediction of Polyethylene Wear Rates from Gait Biomechanics and Implant Positioning in Total Hip Replacement

Wear Simulation of Ceramic-on-Crosslinked Polyethylene Hip Prostheses: A New Non-Oxide Silicon Nitride versus the Gold Standard Composite Oxide Ceramic Femoral Heads.

How have wear testing and joint simulator studies helped to discriminate among materials and designs?

Numerical investigation of knee prosthesis stresses in daily activities: Insight into knee rehabilitation and Creation of a new optimal model