Abstract:Dietrich and Haider (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21 (5), 897-915, 2014) justify their integrative framework for creativity founded on evolutionary theory and prediction research on the grounds that "theories and approaches guiding empirical research on creativity have not been supported by the neuroimaging evidence." Although this justification is controversial, the general direction holds promise. This commentary clarifies points of disagreement and unresolved issues, and addresses mis-applications of evolutionary theory that lead the authors to adopt a Darwinian (versus Lamarckian) approach. To say that creativity is Darwinian is not to say that it consists of variation plus selection - in the everyday sense of the term - as the authors imply; it is to say that evolution is occurring because selection is affecting the distribution of randomly generated heritable variation across generations. In creative thought the distribution of variants is not key, i.e., one is not inclined toward idea A because 60 % of one's candidate ideas are variants of A while only 40 % are variants of B; one is inclined toward whichever seems best. The authors concede that creative variation is partly directed; however, the greater the extent to which variants are generated non-randomly, the greater the extent to which the distribution of variants can reflect not selection but the initial generation bias. Since each thought in a creative process can alter the selective criteria against which the next is evaluated, there is no demarcation into generations as assumed in a Darwinian model. We address the authors' claim that reduced variability and individuality are more characteristic of Lamarckism than Darwinian evolution, and note that a Lamarckian approach to creativity has addressed the challenge of modeling the emergent features associated with insight.

Construction grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology, and cognitive science

Creativity and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and Psychological Issues

A Constructional Approach to Grammar

Nostalgia for the future of Construction Grammar

From language development to language evolution: A unified view of human lexical creativity

Construction Grammar and Artificial Intelligence

Modelling Creativity: Identifying Key Components through a Corpus-Based Approach

AI and the social construction of creativity

Creativity From Constraint Exploration and Exploitation

On the role of creativity in the formation of new complex words

A Comparative Study of Cognitive and Generative Constructional Theories:With Special Reference to Construction Grammar and First Phase Syntax

The Language of Creativity: Evidence from Humans and Large Language Models

Creativity in the age of generative AI

Creativity in AI: Progresses and Challenges

New directions in computational, combinational and structural creativity

On the Creativity of Large Language Models

Construction Grammar and Language Models

Creativity as Variations on a Theme: Formalizations, Evidence, and Engineered Applications

Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent Thinking