Abstract:The inherent complexity of high‐diversity systems can make them particularly difficult to understand. The relatively recent introduction of functional approaches, which seek to infer ecosystem functioning based on species’ ecological traits, has revolutionized our understanding of these high‐diversity systems. Today, the functional structure of an assemblage is widely regarded as a key indicator of the status or resilience of an ecosystem. Indeed, functional evaluations have become a mainstay of monitoring and management approaches. But is the heavy focus on broad metrics of functional structure grounded in empirical research? On tropical coral reefs, the ocean’s most diverse ecosystems, remarkably few studies directly quantify ecosystem functions and the term ‘function’ is widely used but rarely defined, especially when applied to reef fishes. Our review suggests that most ‘functional’ studies do not study function as it relates to ecological processes. Rather, they look at easy‐to‐measure traits or proxies that are thought to have functional significance. However, these links are rarely tested empirically, severely limiting our capacity to extend results from community structure to the dynamic processes operating within high‐diversity ecosystems such as coral reefs. With rapid changes in global ecosystems, and in their capacity to deliver ecosystem services, there is an urgent need to understand and empirically measure the role of organisms in various ecosystem functions. We suggest that if we are to understand and manage transitioning coral reefs in the Anthropocene, a broad definition of the word ‘function’ is needed along with a focus on ecological processes and the empirical quantification of functional roles. In this review, we propose a universal operational definition of the term ‘function’ that works from a cellular to a global level. Specifically, it is the movement or storage of energy or material. Within this broad definitional framework, all functions are part of a continuum that is tied together by the process‐based unifier of material fluxes. With this universal definition at hand, we then present a path forward that will allow us to fully harness the power of functional approaches in understanding and managing high‐diversity systems such as coral reefs. A plain language summary is available for this article. Plain Language Summary

Functions and Functioning in Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic and in Ecology

Re-Examining the Darwinian Basis for Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic

Ecological sustainability as the fourth landmark in the development of conservation ethics

Aldo Leopold's land health from a resilience point of view: self-renewal capacity of social-ecological systems

Land, ethics, justice, and Aldo Leopold

Resonance and Vegetal Citizenship in Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac

Exploring the Contemporary Relevance of Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethics in Environmental Conservation

Risk management and the wisdom of Aldo Leopold

Unifying concepts of biological function from molecules to ecosystems

Thinking like a mountain: A land ethical approach to healthcare resource

Reconceptualizing natural capital and sustainable use of natural capital through Aldo Leopold's land ethic

Niger Delta Environmental Crises and the Limitations of Africanizing Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic: Towards an Earth-Eco-Socialist Model

On Problems of Ethical Land Use

Turning the Whole Soul: The Educational Dialectic of a Sand County Almanac

Does clinical ethics need a Land Ethic?

Health justice in the Anthropocene: medical ethics and the Land Ethic

Land‐use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function

The meaning of the term ‘function’ in ecology: A coral reef perspective

Reciprocal relationships between forest management and regional landscape structures: applying concepts from land system science to private forest management

Functions of Dysfunction

Author Response for "mechanistic Links Between Biodiversity Effects on Ecosystem Functioning and Stability in a Multi‐site Grassland Experiment"