Abstract:admirable that they don’t use the book’s pages as a teleological promotion of PB as the answer to society’s problems. In fact, the authors make a significant and transparent effort to hold themselves at arm’s length from their object of analysis. Participation is not necessarily evidence of democracy. What matters for democracy is what happens after the participation has occurred. It is fundamentally a pragmatist challenge to the literature (and one can sense the presence of John Dewey and others behind the writing): What appreciable difference does participation make in the lives (and actions) of participants, or of anyone else, for that matter? In some cases, the authors tell us, the answer is ‘‘not very much.’’ So, for those who care about democracy, there is still significant work to be done in research and in practice. This leads me to a minor disappointment with the book. In short, I wanted more details on how to connect participation to governance. What should we do? What should we be on the lookout for? How can we do it? This is a compliment, as I found myself convinced in the writing that the authors really know their stuff. Who better to muse on this (and at least spend a page or two more than they allotted in the conclusion) envisioning a real utopia or two? Perhaps this will be their next project. I certainly hope so. This is a unique and important piece of scholarship. The book certainly left me feeling invigorated and motivated to think differently about my own work on deliberation and democracy. I plan to use this book in my courses on Political Sociology and Democracy at the undergraduate level, and I will ask all of my graduate students working in this area to read it. It will become a ‘‘must-read’’ in the field. I imagine the book will be of interest to sociologists, political scientists, and communication scholars, as well as anyone who wants to understand how democracy works. Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing, by Derek Beach and Rasmus Brun Pedersen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016. 388 pp. $39.95 paper. ISBN: 9780472053223.

The Power of Ritual in Prehistory: Secret Societies and the Origins of Social Complexity. BRIAN T. HAYDEN. 2018. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. xii + 398 pp. $125.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-1085-7207-1.

Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing

The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework

Homo neanderthalensi s and the evolutionary origins of ritual in Homo sapiens

The Power Tactics of the Political Ritual——the Politics Analysis Based on the Theory and Practice of Symbols

The coevolution of ritual and society: new 14C dates from ancient Mexico

Beyond Belief: A Scientific Inquiry into the Myths and Looms of Hindu Rituals

[Rituals in therapy, rituals in our lives]

Emotions in Ritual Theories

Underwater ritual offerings in the Island of the Sun and the formation of the Tiwanaku state

The pragmatics of ritual

Celestial Masters: History and Ritual in Early Daoist Communities By Terry F. Kleeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center, 2021. xiii, 425 pp. ISBN: 9780674737167 (cloth).

Power, Political Economy, and Historical Landscapes of the Modern World: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. CHRISTOPHER R. DECORSE, editor. 2019. State University of New York Press, Albany. xiv + 404 pp. $95.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-4384-7343-7. $33.95 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-4384-7342-0.

“Ritual” in Recent Criticism: The Elusive Sense of Community

Ritual Civilization and Mythological Coding

Leading through ritual: Ceremony and emperorship in early modern China

The Brahmin, the Aryan, and the Powers of the Priestly Class: Puzzles in the Study of Indian Religion

The Origins and Psychology of Human Cooperation.

(Re)Connecting Analytic Philosophy and Empirical Research: The Example of Ritual Speech Acts and Religious Collectivities

:Ritual and Economy in Metropolitan China: A Global Social Science Approach

Ritual? What Ritual? Secularization in the Study of Chinese Legal History, from Colonial Encounters to Modern Scholarship