Abstract:Abstract Designs of conventional heliostats have been varied to reduce cost, improve optical performance or both. In one case, reflective mirror area on heliostats has been increased with the goal of reducing the number of pedestals and drives and consequently reducing the cost on those components. The larger reflective areas, however, increase torques due to larger mirror weights and wind loads. Higher cost heavy-duty motors and drives must be used, which negatively impact any economic gains. To improve on optical performance, the opposite may be true where the mirror reflective areas are reduced for better control of the heliostat pointing and tracking. For smaller heliostats, gravity and wind loads are reduced, but many more heliostats must be added to provide sufficient solar flux to the receiver. For conventional heliostats, there seems to be no clear cost advantage of one heliostat design over other designs. The advantage of ganged heliostats is the pedestal and tracking motors are shared between multiple heliostats, thus can significantly reduce the cost on those components. In this paper, a new concept of cable-suspended tensile ganged heliostats is introduced, preliminary analysis is performed for optical performance and incorporated into a 10 MW conceptual power tower plant where it was compared to the performance of a baseline plant with a conventional radially staggered heliostat field. The baseline plant uses conventional heliostats and the layout optimized in System Advisor Model (SAM) tool. The ganged heliostats are suspended on two guide cables. The cables are attached to rotations arms which are anchored to end posts. The layout was optimized offline and then transferred to SAM for performance evaluation. In the initial modeling of the tensile ganged heliostats for a 10 MW power tower plant, equal heliostat spacing along the guide cables was assumed, which as suspected leads to high shading and blocking losses. The goal was then to optimize the heliostat spacing such that annual shading and blocking losses are minimized. After adjusting the spacing on tensile ganged heliostats for minimal blocking losses, the annual block/shading efficiency was greater than 90% and annual optical efficiency of the field became comparable to the conventional field at slightly above 60%.

Challenges and handicaps on the design of an efficient beam-down system at an existing heliostat field layout

Post-Installation Heliostat Field Aiming Strategy Optimization Based on Heliostat Flux Distribution Measurements

Heliostat Field Aiming Strategy Optimization with Post-Installation Calibration

Optical-thermal–mechanical comprehensive performance of the concentrating and collecting subsystem for the next-generation solar power tower based on heliostat field layouts optimization

Cosine Efficiency Distribution with Reduced Tower Shadowing Effect in Rotating Heliostat Field

A Design Study of an Off-axis Paraboloid Shaping Method for Central Receiver System Heliostats

Towards high efficiency heliostat fields

Fast Flux Density Distribution Simulation of Central Receiver System on Gpu

Design, Simulation and On-Sun Experiments of a Modified Sliding-Bed Particle Solar Receiver for Coupling with Tower Concentrating System

Optical-thermal-mechanical analysis of high-temperature receiver integrated with gradually sparse biomimetic heliostat field layouts for the next-generation solar power tower

A new method for the design of the heliostat field layout for solar tower power plant

Review and Gap Analysis of Heliostat Components & Controls

Optical Performance Modeling and Analysis of a Tensile Ganged Heliostat Concept

The Optimization Of Heliostat Canting In A Solar Power Tower Plant

Status Quo and Gap Analysis of Heliostat Field Deployment Processes for Concentrating Solar Tower Plants

Shadowing and Blocking Effect Optimization for a Variable Geometry Heliostat Field

Heliostat layout optimization for load-following solar tower plants

Heliostat field optimization and comparisons between biomimetic spiral and radial-staggered layouts for different heliostat shapes

Heliostat field optimization: A new computationally efficient model and biomimetic layout

Remote Measurement of Heliostat Reflectivity with the Backward Gazing Procedure

Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields