Abstract:Importance: A growing body of literature has been developed with the goal of attempting to understand the experiences of female surgeons. While it has helped to address inequities and promote important programmatic improvements, work remains to be done. Objective: To explore how practicing male and female surgeons' experiences with gender compare across 5 qualitative/quantitative domains: career aspirations, gender-based discrimination, mentor-mentee relationships, perceived barriers, and recommendations for change. Design, setting, and participants: This national concurrent mixed-methods survey of Fellows of the American College of Surgeons (FACS) compared differences between male and female FACS. Differences between female FACS and female members of the Association of Women Surgeons (AWS) were also explored. A randomly selected 3:1 sample of US-based male and female FACS was surveyed between January and June 2020. Female AWS members were surveyed in May 2020. Exposure: Self-reported gender. Main outcomes and measures: Self-reported experiences with career aspirations (quantitative), gender-based discrimination (quantitative), mentor-mentee relationships (quantitative), perceived barriers (qualitative), and recommendations for change (qualitative). Results: A total of 2860 male FACS (response rate: 38.1% [2860 of 7500]) and 1070 female FACS (response rate: 42.8% [1070 of 2500]) were included, in addition to 536 female AWS members. Demographic characteristics were similar between randomly selected male and female FACS, with the notable exception that female FACS were less likely to be married (720 [67.3%] vs 2561 [89.5%]; nonresponse-weighted P < .001) and have children (660 [61.7%] vs 2600 [90.9%]; P < .001). Compared with female FACS, female AWS members were more likely to be younger and hold additional graduate degrees (320 [59.7%] were married; 238 [44.4%] had children). FACS of both genders acknowledged positive and negative aspects of dealing with gender in a professional setting, including shared experiences of gender-based harassment, discrimination, and blame. Female FACS were less likely to have had gender-concordant mentors. They were more likely to emphasize the importance of gender when determining career aspirations and prioritizing future mentor-mentee relationships. Moving forward, female FACS emphasized the importance of avoiding competition among female surgeons. They encouraged male surgeons to acknowledge gender bias and admit their potential role. Male FACS encouraged male and female surgeons to treat everyone the same. Conclusions and relevance: Experiences with gender are not limited to supportive female surgeons. The results of this study emphasize the importance of recognizing the voices of all stakeholders involved when striving to promote workforce diversity and the related need to develop quality improvement/surgical education initiatives that enhance inclusion through open, honest discourse.

The Glass Ceiling in Plastic Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Gender Gap in Career Advancement

Is the Glass-Ceiling Higher Than We Think? Sex Disparity Trends in Physician Executive Positions and Academic Plastic Surgery

A Work in Progress: Women's Status in the Plastic Surgery Workforce and Recommendations for Success

Understanding and Overcoming Implicit Gender Bias in Plastic Surgery

Gender Parity at the Podium in UK Plastic Surgery Conferences

Perceptions on gender disparity in surgery and surgical leadership: A multicenter mixed methods study

Gender Disparities Among Craniofacial Surgeons

The Glass Ceiling in Global Health: Perspectives of Female and Male Anesthesiologists

Challenges to Professional Success for Women Plastic Surgeons: An International Survey

Gender Disparities in Surgical Subspecialties: A CMS Data Analysis

Comparison of Male and Female Surgeons' Experiences With Gender Across 5 Qualitative/Quantitative Domains

Women in Plastic Surgery Innovation

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery

Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Diversity in Plastic Surgery: Evaluating Effective Initiatives and Identifying Areas for Improvement

Gender Diversity Among Reconstructive Microsurgery Studies Based on the Relative Citation Ratio

Women in minimally invasive gynecological surgery and endometriosis challenges and overcoming

Publication Trends and Surgeon Perceptions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gender Disparities in Craniofacial Surgery

815 Gender Parity in Neurosurgery Residencies: An Analysis

Ivory tower in MD/PhD programmes: sticky floor, broken ladder and glass ceiling

Utilizing Relative Citation Ratio to Compare Academic Productivity by Gender in Plastic Surgery

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery: Where Do We Stand? Highlighting Overlooked Issues in Efforts to Improve Representation