Consciousness can overflow report: novel evidence from attribute amnesia of a single stimulus

Rui Wang,Yingtao Fu,Luo Chen,Yutong Chen,Jifan Zhou,HUI CHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/r35ac
2020-08-25
Abstract:Subjective report has been used as a measurement of consciousness. However, we usually experience seeing much more than what can be reported. This relates to a long-standing controversy regarding the nature of visual consciousness; that is, whether it is confined to cognitive access and can be directly measured by reportability, or whether it is rich and overflows report. Most debate previously concentrated on the unattended information, but acquiesced that information under attentional focus would reach consciousness and be reportable. This study sought to further address the debate from a new perspective, through directly testing whether fully attended supraliminal information is necessarily reportable with a variant of attribute amnesia. Participants were asked to judge the parity of a single number (Experiments 1 & 3) or whether a Chinese character referred to furniture (Experiments 2 & 4). After several trials, they were unexpectedly asked to report the target identity. The results consistently showed that participants could not correctly report the target identity, indicating that fully attended information that was consciously perceived could sometimes overflow report. These findings not only provide novel evidence for the overflow argument, but also have crucial implications in the relationship between consciousness and working memory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?