Abstract:The limited capacity of visual working memory (VWM) requires an efficient information selection mechanism. However, an uneconomical object-based encoding manner of VWM has been consistently found in previous studies. That is, not only the target feature, but also the task-irrelevant features from the same object are extracted into VWM. Besides the totally task-irrelevant feature which is never useful throughout the whole task, there is another kind of “irrelevant feature” that is necessary initially but no longer useful for the left task, termed as key feature in Chen & Wyble (2015)’s Attribute Amnesia studies. Previous studies showed that despite participants could not explicitly report the key feature in a surprise memory test, they had some memory traces for this unreportable information that could still produce an inter-trial priming effect. The current study sought to investigate the status of memory representation of a key feature by directly comparing it with the memory representation of a totally irrelevant feature from the same object (which serves as a baseline). In a series of experiments, participants were asked to memorize one feature of a single object, and then performed a visual search task in which there was either one of the distractors matching the task-irrelevant feature or key feature of the memory item, or there was no match between the memory and search display. Surprisingly, the results convergingly showed that despite a reliable WM-driven attentional bias effect (i.e., longer search time in the match condition than the no-match neutral condition) was generated by a task-irrelevant feature of an object, there was no such an effect triggered by the key feature. These findings suggested that participants might tend to actively inhibit just used information (i.e., key feature), resulting in even weaker memory representation of such information as compared to that of completely task-irrelevant features.

Attribute Amnesia: Failure to report attended, task-relevant attributes of a highly visible object.

Amnesia for object attributes: failure to report attended information that had just reached conscious awareness.

Amnesia for Object Attributes

Attribute Amnesia Reflects a Lack of Memory Consolidation for Attended Information.

Accessing without remembering: memory consolidation of information at the focus of awareness is optional

Attribute amnesia can be modulated by foveal presentation and the pre-allocation of endogenous spatial attention

Prolonged Focal Attention Without Binding: Tracking A Ball for Half A Minute Without Remembering Its Color

Memory consolidation of attended information is optional: Comment on Jiang et al. (2016).

From location to configuration: Does the Structure of a Display stick in memory as strongly as target location?

Attribute amnesia as a product of experience-dependent encoding

Does attribute amnesia occur with the presentation of complex, meaningful stimuli? The answer is, “it depends”

Attention with or Without Working Memory: Mnemonic Reselection of Attended Information.

Could Source Amnesia Occur in the Context of Working Memory

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

Attribute amnesia and priming 1

Meaningful objects avoid attribute amnesia due to incidental long-term memories

Visual Search May Not Require Target Representation in Working Memory or Long-Term Memory.

Attribute amnesia is greatly reduced with novel stimuli

Attribute Amnesia in the Auditory Domain

Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.

The Location but Not the Attributes of Visual Cues Are Automatically Encoded into Working Memory