Changing Attitudes of Beijingness to Westernized Place Names in Beijing: From the Semi-Colonial Period to Postmodern Twenty-First Century

Shangyi Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_225-1

2020-01-01

Abstract:One of the goals of China’s place name governance, which started in 2015, is to remove westernized place names. This study investigates what westernized place names are not suitable for a city in China. It uses Beijing as an example to analyze the westernized place names of Beijing in three periods against the prevailing social background. The first period is from the end of the Qing Dynasty to the early years of the Republic of China. The second period is from 1949 to 1980 which started with the foundation of People’s Republic of China to the early years of China beginning to open up. The third period is from 1980 to 2019. In addressing this topic both the government and the mass media have asked major questions for study by toponymic scholars. Two major conclusions are provided. First, Beijingness knew the symbolic meaning of place names in the first period and actively used place naming and renaming to reflect the prevailing ideological viewpoint of society. In the last period real estate developers started to commercialize the cultural capital of westernized place names. Second, after three periods of examining westernized place names, the attitudes of Beijingness toward westernized place names reflect balances between the old and new, the local and global, and a positioning and spiritual function. This discussion advances thinking about the administrative management of the westernized place names in Beijing and even in China, that is, acknowledging that the laws and regulations on place names need to be coordinated with existing laws and regulations, including those addressing property rights.