Extracting diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity from 3‐direction DWI scans using deep learning

Eric Aliotta,Hamidreza Nourzadeh,Sohil H. Patel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28470
2020-08-18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To develop and evaluate machine‐learning methods that reconstruct fractional anisotropy (FA) values and mean diffusivities (MD) from 3‐direction diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisitions.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Two machine‐learning models were implemented to map undersampled dMRI signals with high‐quality FA and MD maps that were reconstructed from fully sampled DTI scans. The first model was a previously described multilayer perceptron (MLP), which maps signals and FA/MD values from a single voxel. The second was a convolutional neural network U‐Net model, which maps dMRI slices to full FA/MD maps. Each method was trained on dMRI brain scans (N = 46), and reconstruction accuracies were compared with conventional linear‐least‐squares (LLS) reconstructions.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>In an independent testing cohort (N = 20), 3‐direction U‐Net reconstructions had significantly lower absolute FA error than both 3‐direction MLP (U‐Net<sub>3‐dir</sub>: 0.06 ± 0.01 vs. MLP<sub>3‐dir</sub>: 0.08 ± 0.01, <i>P</i> &lt; 1 × 10<sup>−5</sup>) and 6‐direction LLS (LLS<sub>6‐dir</sub>: 0.09 ± 0.03, <i>P</i> = 1 × 10<sup>−5</sup>). The MD errors were not significantly different among 3‐direction MLP (0.06 ± 0.01 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s), 3‐direction U‐Net (0.06 ± 0.01 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s), and 6‐direction LLS (0.07 ± 0.02 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, <i>P</i> &gt; .1). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>The proposed U‐Net model reconstructed FA from 3‐direction dMRI scans with improved accuracy compared with both a previously described MLP approach and LLS fitting from 6‐direction scans. The MD reconstruction accuracies did not differ significantly between reconstructions.</p></section>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?