Social innovation in health training to engage researchers in resource-limited settings: process description and evaluation
Yusha Tao,Rayner Kay Jin Tan,Megan Wohlfarth,Emmanuel Ahumuza,Ogechukwu Benedicta Aribodor,Jose Rene Bagani Cruz,Marvinson See Fajardo,Malida Magista,Gifty Marley,Jana Deborah Mier-Alpaño,Uchenna Chukwunonso Ogwaluonye,Kathleen Agudelo Paipilla,Charlotte Pana Scott,Allan Ulitin,Elizabeth Chen,Dan Wu,Phyllis Awor,Weiming Tang,Meredith Labarda,Joseph D Tucker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae025
2024-03-19
Health Promotion International
Abstract:Abstract Research on social innovations in health has increased in recent years. However, little training is geared toward enhancing social innovation research capacity. Most health training for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is developed by individuals in high-income countries, disregarding LMIC researchers’ wisdom and insights and the communities’ needs. Our team organized a multi-phase investigation involving a series of surveys and co-creation group discussions to assess individuals’ training needs that directly informed a subsequent co-created training workshop series. We conducted a Hennessy–Hicks Training Needs Assessment among the Social Innovation in Health Initiative (SIHI) network and formed a co-creation group comprising SIHI fellows to design related training workshops. We ran a final evaluation survey and analyzed the workshop series’ strengths, weaknesses and threats. Descriptive and thematic analysis were employed to analyze survey data and open-ended responses. The final evaluation survey captured data from 165 learners in 35 countries, including 26 LMICs. Most participants (67.3%, 111/165) rated the training workshop series as excellent, and 30.3% (50/165) rated it as good on a five-point scale. The need for writing research grants and manuscripts was rated the highest priority. Learners were interested in community-engaged research and diversity, equity and inclusion. This workshop illustrated how co-creation could be an effective tool for developing training materials tailored for LMIC researchers. We also offer a template for conducting a needs assessment and subsequent training workshops for LMICs. The ground-up, locally developed courses may be more effective than externally developed training programs intended for LMICs.
public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services