Laura A. Taylor
Abstract:Attending to both the political and pedagogical dimensions of silence in schools, this article engages in a close analysis of the silences constructed within an interaction between one first-grade student and his teacher in order to build theory regarding how silence is constructed in the classroom. Drawing on theories of neoliberalism as well as humanizing pedagogy, it presents multiple readings of this interaction to illustrate how interpretation of silence is shaped by ideology. Further, it emphasizes the mediating role of mandated standardized curriculum in the production of silence in this interaction. Through this analysis, it argues that neoliberalism creates both ideological and material barriers to the practice of silence in contemporary classrooms, while also suggesting how silence might be strategically used by teachers as a humanizing pedagogical resource.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: How are the political and pedagogical dimensions of classroom silence constructed and interpreted in the context of neoliberal education? Specifically, by analyzing the moments of silence in the interaction between a first - grade student and his teacher, the author explores the following issues:
1. **Multiple interpretations of silence**: Silence in the classroom can be interpreted as compliance, resistance or ignorance, depending on the perspectives of teachers and students. Meanwhile, the silence intentionally used by teachers (such as "wait - time") is usually regarded as a positive teaching strategy. This contradictory understanding reveals the influence of power operations in the classroom on the production and interpretation of silence.
2. **The conflict between neoliberalism and humanized education**: Neoliberalism emphasizes standardization and efficiency, which creates ideological and material obstacles to silence in classroom practice. For example, mandatory standardized curricula and high - stakes tests require teachers and students to participate in competition, causing them to focus more on task completion rather than the process of humanized education. Humanized education, on the other hand, focuses on the subjectivity and interaction of learners and attaches importance to students' existing knowledge and abilities.
3. **Silence as a teaching and political tool**: Silence is not only an element in the teaching process, but also a political tool, and its production and interpretation are closely related to power. By analyzing specific cases of teacher - student interaction, the author shows different interpretations of the same silent event from different theoretical perspectives.
### Specific research questions
- How can classroom silence be understood through the theoretical perspectives of neoliberalism and humanized education?
- How does the mandatory standardized curriculum affect the production and interpretation of classroom silence?
- How do teachers and students jointly construct silence and give it different meanings?
### Research methods
The author conducts a detailed analysis of a writing session between a first - grade student Xavier and his teacher Ms. Clinton, and combines discourse analysis and body interaction theory to explore the role of silence in classroom interaction. The research data include field notes, video and audio recordings, and interview materials.
### Main findings
By comparing the perspectives of neoliberalism and humanized education, the author finds that:
- **Neoliberal perspective**: Silence is regarded as an inefficient or non - compliant performance. Especially under the pressure of the standardized curriculum, teachers may interpret students' silence as a lack of participation or insufficient ability.
- **Humanized education perspective**: Silence can be a way for students to think, reflect or express resistance. Teachers should regard it as a valuable interactive resource and encourage students to express their voices through silence.
Finally, the author proposes that in the context of neoliberal education, teachers can strategically use silence as a resource for humanized teaching to promote a more inclusive and equal classroom environment.