Abstract:The recent imperative by the National Institutes of Health to share scientific data publicly underscores a significant shift in academic research. Effective as of January 2023, it emphasizes that transparency in data collection and dedicated efforts towards data sharing are prerequisites for translational research, from the lab to the bedside. Given the role of data access in mitigating potential bias in clinical models, we hypothesize that researchers who leverage open-access datasets rather than privately-owned ones are more diverse. In this brief report, we proposed to test this hypothesis in the transdisciplinary and expanding field of artificial intelligence (AI) for critical care. Specifically, we compared the diversity among authors of publications leveraging open datasets, such as the commonly used MIMIC and eICU databases, with that among authors of publications relying exclusively on private datasets, unavailable to other research investigators (e.g., electronic health records from ICU patients accessible only to Mayo Clinic analysts). To measure the extent of author diversity, we characterized gender balance as well as the presence of researchers from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and minority-serving institutions (MSI). Our comparative analysis revealed a greater contribution of authors from LMICs and MSIs among researchers leveraging open critical care datasets than among those relying exclusively on private data resources. The participation of women was similar between the two groups, albeit slightly larger in the former. Notably, although over 70% of all articles included at least one author inferred to be a woman, less than 25% had a woman as a first or last author. Importantly, we found that the proportion of authors from LMICs was substantially higher in the treatment than in the control group (10.1% vs. 6.2%, p<0.001), including as first and last authors. Moreover, we found that the proportion of US-based authors affiliated with a MSI was 1.5 times higher among articles in the treatment than in the control group, suggesting that open data resources attract a larger pool of participants from minority groups (8.6% vs. 5.6%, p<0.001). Thus, our study highlights the valuable contribution of the Open Data strategy to underrepresented groups, while also quantifying persisting gender gaps in academic and clinical research at the intersection of computer science and healthcare. In doing so, we hope our work points to the importance of extending open data practices in deliberate and systematic ways.

Improving data access democratizes and diversifies science

Evaluating the (in)accessibility of data behind papers in astronomy

Towards a paradigm for open and free sharing of scientific data on global change science in China

Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition

Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data

Toward Democratizing Access to Facilities Data: A Framework for Intelligent Data Discovery and Delivery

Sustainable Data Democratization: A Multifaceted Investment for an Equitable Future

Open Science and the impact of Open Access, Open Data, and FAIR publishing principles on data-driven academic research: Towards ever more transparent, accessible, and reproducible academic output?

Big Data, Data Science, and Civil Rights

Data Sustainability and Reuse Pathways of Natural Resources and Environmental Scientists

Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines

Satellite data for environmental justice: a scoping review of the literature in the United States

Make scientific data FAIR

Achieving Open Access to Conservation Science

Scientific literature text mining and the case for Open Access

From Data to Knowledge to Action: A Global Enabler for the 21st Century

The socio-economic value of satellite earth observations: huge, yet to be measured

Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide

Assessing the Extent and Impact of Online Data Sharing in Eddy Covariance Flux Research

Opening practice: supporting reproducibility and critical spatial data science

Open with care