Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

A Jurisprudential Analysis of Authorization for Experimental Administrative Reform

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

On Empowerment of Administrative Investigation Power

Experimentalist approach of Chinese legislation model: From passive response to institutional design

A Study on Administrative Permission Modification

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

Reform of Non-administrative Licensing Approval：Reviewing and Responding

The Formation and Progress of the Theory of Shrink of Administrative Discretion:From the Perspective of Administration to Prevent Dangers

The "Necessary and Dangerous" Power: Administrative Prerogative in Constitutional Controversies of the Early Republic of China

The Public Deciding Force of Administrative Action and Impairment of Public Affairs

On Authoritativeness of Legal System

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Constrained Power Expansion: China’s Procuratorial Reforms Within and Beyond Criminal Justice

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

Logic Foundation and Practical Text of Administration by Law

Administrative Self-regulation and Rule of Administrative Law:A Preliminary Invest

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law