Effects of Exercise Training on Fear-Avoidance in Pain and Pain-Free Populations: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Joshua Hanel,Patrick J. Owen,Steffen Held,Scott D. Tagliaferri,Clint T. Miller,Lars Donath,Daniel L. Belavy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01345-1

IF: 11.928

2020-09-18

Sports Medicine

Abstract:Fear of pain and movement is an important factor in the development of hypervigilance and avoidance behaviours.

sport sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effects of exercise/physical activity on fear of movement in people with spine-related pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ferozkhan Jadhakhan,Raghip Sobeih,Deborah Falla,Jadhakhan,F.,Sobeih,R.,Falla,D.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060264

IF: 3.006

2022-05-20

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Low back pain and neck pain are leading causes of disability. Although several studies have examined the effect of exercise on fear of movement in people with spine-related pain, the overall evidence supporting the beneficial effect of different forms of exercise on fear of movement remains unknown. This systematic review will determine the strength of evidence for the effect of exercise/physical activity on fear of movement in people with non-specific spine-related pain. Methods/analysis This review protocol was developed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. The review will include randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies that recruited adults (≥18 years) with chronic non-specific spine-related pain and where a validated measure of fear of movement/kinesiophobia such as the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and the Fear Avoidance Behaviour Questionnaire (FABQ) or any other validated measures to ascertain fear of movement/kinesiophobia was employed. Bibliographic databases include MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, ZETOC, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar as well as key journals/grey literature will be searched from inception to 31 January 2022. Only articles published in English will be considered eligible. Two independent reviewers will search, screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias. Preintervention and postintervention mean and SD with 95% CI of the outcome data (TSK or FABQ) will be extracted or estimated where possible. If possible, study results will be pooled into a meta-analysis. A narrative synthesis of the results will be presented if heterogeneity is high. The overall quality of evidence and risk of bias will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and Risk Of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions guidelines. Ethics and dissemination This systematic review does not require ethical approval as existing data will be used. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and via national and international conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021295755.

medicine, general & internal
A Meta‐analysis of the Associations of Elements of the Fear‐Avoidance Model of Chronic Pain with Negative Affect, Depression, Anxiety, Pain‐related Disability and Pain Intensity

Andrew H. Rogers,Samantha G. Farris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1994

2022-06-24

European Journal of Pain

Abstract:Background and Objective Biopsychosocial conceptualizations of clinical pain conditions recognize the multi‐faceted nature of pain experience and its intersection with mental health. A primary cognitive‐behavioral framework is the Fear‐Avoidance Model, which posits that pain catastrophizing and fear of pain (including avoidance, cognitions, and physiological reactivity) are key antecedents to, and drivers of, pain intensity and disability, in addition to pain‐related psychological distress. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the magnitude of the cross‐sectional association between the primary components of the Fear‐Avoidance Model (pain catastrophizing, fear of pain, pain vigilance) with negative affect, anxiety, depression, pain intensity, and disabilities in studies of clinical pain. Databases and Data Treatment A search of MEDLINE and PubMed databases resulted in 335 studies that were evaluated in this meta‐analytic review, which represented 65,340 participants. Results Results from the random effect models indicated a positive, medium‐ to large‐sized association between fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, and pain vigilance measures and outcomes (pain‐related negative affect, anxiety, depression and pain‐related disability), and medium‐sized associations with pain intensity. Fear of pain measurement type was a significant moderator of effects across all outcomes. Conclusions These findings provide empirical support, aligned with the components of the Fear‐Avoidance Model, for the relevance of both pain catastrophizing and fear of pain to the pain experience and its intersection with mental health. Implications for the conceptualization of the pain catastrophizing and fear of pain construct and its measurement are discussed.

neurosciences,clinical neurology,anesthesiology
What Is the Relationship of Fear Avoidance to Physical Function and Pain Intensity in Injured Athletes?

Stefan F. Fischerauer,Mojtaba Talaei-Khoei,Rens Bexkens,David C. Ring,Luke S. Oh,Ana-Maria Vranceanu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000085

IF: 4.755

2018-02-16

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Fear avoidance can play a prominent role in maladaptive responses to an injury. In injured athletes, such pain-related fear or fear avoidance behavior may have a substantial influence on the recovery process. Specifically, it may explain why some are able to reach their preinjury abilities, whereas others are unable to return to sport.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is fear avoidance in athletes associated with decreased physical function after injury? (2) To what degree is fear avoidance associated with athletes' pain intensity?METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we recruited injured athletes-defined as patients with sports-related injury, weekly engagement in sport activities, participation in competitive events as part of a team or club, self-identification as an athlete, and a desire to return to sport after recovery-from an orthopaedic sports medicine center at a major urban university hospital. Of 130 approached patients, 102 (84% men; mean ± SD age 25 ± 8.5 years) met the inclusion criteria. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, the Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire, which assesses injury-related fear and avoidance behavior specifically in an athletic population, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and two Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures: Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) and Pain Intensity CAT.RESULTS: After controlling for age, injury region (upper versus lower extremity), catastrophic thinking, and emotional distress, we found that an increase in athletes' fear avoidance was associated with a decrease in physical function (b = -0.32; p = 0.002). The model explained 30% of the variation in physical function with 7.3% explained uniquely by fear avoidance. After controlling for initial appointment/followup, surgery for the current condition, multiple pain conditions, history of prior sport-related injury/surgery, pain medication prescription, catastrophic thinking, and emotional distress, athletes' fear avoidance was not associated with pain (b = -0.14; p = 0.249). The model explained 40% of the variation in pain intensity and pain catastrophizing (b = 0.30; p = 0.001) uniquely explained 7.1% of this variation.CONCLUSIONS: In injured athletes, fear avoidance is independently associated with decreased physical function, whereas pain catastrophizing is associated with high pain intensity. Both level of an athlete's fear avoidance and catastrophic thinking about pain should be accounted for in clinical interventions aimed at helping athletes improve recovery and return to sport.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

surgery,orthopedics
The effects of a 15-week physical exercise intervention on pain modulation in fibromyalgia: Increased pain-related processing within the cortico-striatal- occipital networks, but no improvement of exercise-induced hypoalgesia

Monika Löfgren,Angelica Sandström,Indre Bileviciute-Ljungar,Kaisa Mannerkorpi,Björn Gerdle,Malin Ernberg,Peter Fransson,Eva Kosek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynpai.2023.100114

2023-01-06

Abstract:Dysfunctional top-down pain modulation is a hallmark of fibromyalgia (FM) and physical exercise is a cornerstone in FM treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of a 15-week intervention of strengthening exercises, twice per week, supervised by a physiotherapist, on exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) and cerebral pain processing in FM patients and healthy controls (HC). FM patients (n = 59) and HC (n = 39) who completed the exercise intervention as part of a multicenter study were examined at baseline and following the intervention. Following the exercise intervention, FM patients reported a reduction of pain intensity, fibromyalgia severity and depression. Reduced EIH was seen in FM patients compared to HC at baseline and no improvement of EIH was seen following the 15-week resistance exercise intervention in either group. Furthermore, a subsample (Stockholm site: FM n = 18; HC n = 19) was also examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during subjectively calibrated thumbnail pressure pain stimulations at baseline and following intervention. A significant main effect of exercise (post > pre) was observed both in FM patients and HC, in pain-related brain activation within left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and caudate, as well as increased functional connectivity between caudate and occipital lobe bordering cerebellum (driven by the FM patients). In conclusion, the results indicate that 15-week resistance exercise affect pain-related processing within the cortico-striatal-occipital networks (involved in motor control and cognition), rather than directly influencing top-down descending pain inhibition. In alignment with this, exercise-induced hypoalgesia remained unaltered.
Fear of pain and pain intensity: Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Tobias Markfelder,Paul Pauli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000228

IF: 22.4

2020-05-01

Psychological Bulletin

Abstract:The fear avoidance model (FAM) represents a cognitive-behavioral explanatory approach for pain chronification. The core assumption is that fear of pain (FOP) following an acute pain experience facilitates the development of pain chronification, disability, and receding functionality. Thus, the model predicts a positive association between FOP and pain intensity in pain patients, which was frequently investigated; however, results were inconsistent. To highlight inconsistencies, we performed integrative statistical analysis aimed at evaluating the strength of the cross-sectional relation between FOP and pain intensity in clinical research and reviewing its moderation through demographic, pain-specific and psychosocial characteristics. To this end, we searched the databases PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science and included 253 independent effect size estimates (N = 42 463). The overall mean effect size was computed based on a random-effects model. By utilizing the artifact distribution method, we supplemented it with an analysis correcting for artifacts. The magnitude of the positive association equated to the threshold between a small to medium effect size, which was expected as the FAM predicts an indirect relation only. The association turned out to be stable across different FOP measures, but was significantly moderated by age, pain localization, first-time pain episode, pain onset, treatment status, and anxiety sensitivity. A potentially necessary differentiation of patient subgroups and suggestions for an adjusted methodological approach of future research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

psychology, multidisciplinary
Brain Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia: To Find a Way Out from “Fear-Avoidance Belief”

Katsuya Kami,Fumihiro Tajima,Emiko Senba

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052886

IF: 5.6

2022-03-07

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract:It is well known that exercise produces analgesic effects (exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH)) in animal models and chronic pain patients, but the brain mechanisms underlying these EIH effects, especially concerning the emotional aspects of pain, are not yet fully understood. In this review, we describe drastic changes in the mesocorticolimbic system of the brain which permit the induction of EIH effects. The amygdala (Amyg) is a critical node for the regulation of emotions, such as fear and anxiety, which are closely associated with chronic pain. In our recent studies using neuropathic pain (NPP) model mice, we extensively examined the association between the Amyg and EIH effects. We found that voluntary exercise (VE) activated glutamate (Glu) neurons in the medial basal Amyg projecting to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) lateral shell, while it almost completely suppressed NPP-induced activation of GABA neurons in the central nucleus of the Amyg (CeA). Furthermore, VE significantly inhibited activation of pyramidal neurons in the ventral hippocampus-CA1 region, which play important roles in contextual fear conditioning and the retrieval of fear memory. This review describes novel information concerning the brain mechanisms underlying EIH effects as a result of overcoming the fear-avoidance belief of chronic pain.

biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, multidisciplinary
eHealth Interventions for Managing Spine Pain—Benefits for Pain, Quality of Life, Catastrophizing and Fear Avoidance Beliefs: An Overview of Systematic Reviews With Meta-analysis

Olga Villar-Alises,Cristina García-Muñoz,Javier Matias-Soto,Javier Martinez-Calderon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12844

2024-12-01

Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

Abstract:Journal of Orthopaedic &Sports Physical Therapy, Volume 54, Issue 12, Page 748-765, December 2024.

rehabilitation,orthopedics,sport sciences
Graded In Vivo Exposure Treatment for Fear-Avoidant Pain Patients with Functional Disability: A Case Study

Steven J. Linton,Thomas Overmeer,Markus Janson,Johan W. S. Vlaeyen,Jeroen R. de Jong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070252959481

2002-01-01

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract:This single-subject study attempts to replicate the effects of in vivo exposure for pain patients with functional difficulties. Fear-avoidance is a clear risk factor related to dysfunction associated with back pain. Nevertheless, until recently treatment had not dealt specifically with the avoidance behaviour. The treatment of other phobias suggests that in vivo exposure might be an efficient means of treatment. As patients do not normally conceptualize their problem as a phobia, there have been numerous problems in developing exposure techniques. Recently, however, an in vivo exposure technique for pain-related functional problems has been described. The study described here replicates the method: 2 male chronic back pain patients with functional problems and high scores on the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia volunteered to participate. Hierarchies were established with the help of a "fear thermometer" and the patients were subsequently provided with 8 sessions of in vivo exposure. The results replicated the original study and showed substantial improvements for both patients as they increased their function and decreased their fear. Thus, the findings are extended to another setting: patients and therapists. It is concluded that these results warrant further investigation in larger, controlled trials. Key words: back pain, activity training exposure, fear-avoidance.

psychology, clinical
Pain-related fear of movement dynamics in individuals with and without low back pain participating in weightlifting and/or powerlifting training

Bernard X W Liew,Josce Syrett,Paul Freeman,David W Evans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276983

IF: 3.7

2022-10-27

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Purpose: Pain-free adults in the general population have been shown to possess unhelpful beliefs that certain movements and postures are harmful to the spine, potentially reinforcing fear-avoidance behaviour. Whether such beliefs occur in individuals undertaking regular powerlifting (PL) and Olympic weightlifting (OWL) training is unclear. Methods: In a cross-sectional study design, 67 individuals who participate in OWL and PL training completed an online survey. Demographic characteristics, training history, and self-reported perceptions of harm, on the 40-item Photograph Series of Daily Activities shortened electronic version (PHODA-SeV), were collected. After removing collinear variables, 13 items were entered into a network analysis, in which the adjusted correlations between items, and the centrality indices of each item (i.e., the degree of connection with other symptoms in the network) were quantified. Results: Twenty-one (31.3%) participants had LBP symptoms. The pairwise correlations with the greatest magnitudes were between images of 'leg stretch' and 'jumping' (0.32 [95%CI 0.08 to 0.45]) and two images depicting ironing (0.32 [95%CI 0.05 to 0.54]) respectively. The three most Central (connected) items were 'stair ascend', 'walking with groceries', and 'mopping with spine flexion'. Conclusions: For individuals training in OWL and PL, images reflecting walking, rather than those depicting high spinal flexion angle, had greater connectivity to other activity items. In addition, the strongest correlations were not between items reflecting high spinal flexion angle. Future studies that investigate the relationship between different intensities of OWL and PL training and the dynamics of pain-related fear are warranted.
Effects of therapeutic exercise on pain processing in people with chronic non-specific neck pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Adriane Aguayo-Alves,Giovanna Laura Neves Antônio Gaban,Marcos Amaral de Noronha,Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103183

2024-09-11

Abstract:Background: Emerging evidence suggests that individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain may experience altered sensory processing, potentially contributing to the modest response to therapeutic exercise treatments. Objective: This systematic review aims to explore the effect of therapeutic exercise on pain processing among patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, SportDiscus, and Cochrane CENTRAL) from inception to June 2023. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing therapeutic exercise to non-exercise treatments or no treatment. The screening and data extraction was conducted by two reviewers. The methodological quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The primary outcomes assessed were pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation. Results: Thirteen trials included a total of 948 participants, with 586 in the exercise therapy group and 362 in the non-exercise group. The therapeutic exercise was not superior to non-exercise treatments for both local and PPT in the immediate (MD = 0.13, 95%CI = -0.18 to 0.43), and short-term follow-up (MD = 0.17, 95%CI = -0.27 to 0.61). In the medium term, therapeutic exercise demonstrated a small effect size in increasing local PPT (Kg/cm2) (MD = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.08 to 1.19) compared to non-exercise interventions. The certainty of evidence for these outcomes was very low. Conclusions: There is very low certainty of evidence that therapeutic exercise is not superior than non-exercise treatment on pain processing in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.
Effects of exercise in adults with cancer pain: a systematic review and Network meta-analysis

Jie Wang,Meiling Lv,Hongpeng Li,Dongqing Guo,Xin Chu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.033

2024-08-30

Abstract:Context: Pain is one of the most common symptoms of cancer patients, affecting the patient's physical, psychological, behavioral, social relations and other aspects. Previous studies have demonstrated that exercise is effective for cancer pain, and the optimal exercise is still unknown. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of different exercise interventions on cancer pain in adults. Methods: Randomized control trials identified from medical literature databases that reported effects of exercise in adults with cancer pain were included in this study. Literature screening and data extraction were conducted independently by two researchers. Cochrane Bias Assessment 2.0 was used to assess the quality of the literature, and Stata 15.0 software was used for Network meta-analysis. Results: Forty-one studies were included, involving 3537 patients with cancer pain. The types of exercise involved included aerobic exercise, medium intensity continuous training, high-intensity interval training, resistance exercise, mind-body exercise and comprehensive exercise program (CEP). The results suggested that CEP was more effective than the usual care in relieving pain intensity in cancer patients [SMD=-1.96,95%CI (-3.47, -0.44)] (SUCRA=97.9%). Mind-body exercise outperformed usual care in reducing pain interference in cancer patients [SMD = -0.65, 95% CI (-1.21, -0.09)] (SUCRA=83.8%). Conclusion: Current evidence shows that CEP is the best way to relieve the pain intensity of cancer patients, and mind-body exercise is the best way to reduce pain interference of cancer patients. Due to the limited number and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions need to be further verified by more high-quality studies.
Mindfulness training and exercise differentially impact fear extinction neurocircuitry

Shaked E Leibovitz,Gunes Sevinc,Jonathan Greenberg,Britta Hölzel,Tim Gard,Thomas Calahan,Mark Vangel,Scott P Orr,Mohammed R Milad,Sara W Lazar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723002593

Abstract:Background: The ability to extinguish a maladaptive conditioned fear response is crucial for healthy emotional processing and resiliency to aversive experiences. Therefore, enhancing fear extinction learning has immense potential emotional and health benefits. Mindfulness training enhances both fear conditioning and recall of extinguished fear; however, its effects on fear extinction learning are unknown. Here we investigated the impact of mindfulness training on brain mechanisms associated with fear-extinction learning, compared to an exercise-based program. Methods: We investigated BOLD activations in response to a previously learned fear-inducing cue during an extinction paradigm, before and after an 8-week mindfulness-based stress reduction program (MBSR, n = 49) or exercise-based stress management education program (n = 27). Results: The groups exhibited similar reductions in stress, but the MBSR group was uniquely associated with enhanced activation of salience network nodes and increased hippocampal engagement. Conclusions: Our results suggest that mindfulness training increases attention to anticipatory aversive stimuli, which in turn facilitates decreased aversive subjective responses and enhanced reappraisal of the memory.
Exercise Training for Chronic Pain: Available Evidence, Current Recommendations, and Potential Mechanisms

Jacob V Ninneman,Gunnar A Roberge,Aaron J Stegner,Dane B Cook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2024_504

Abstract:Chronic pain conditions pose a significant global burden of disability, with epidemiological data indicating a rising incidence. Exercise training is commonly recommended as a standalone or complementary approach for managing various chronic pain conditions like low back pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia syndrome, and neuropathic pain. Regardless of the specific condition or underlying cause (e.g., autoimmune disease, chronic inflammation), exercise training consistently leads to moderate to large reductions in pain. Moreover, exercise yields numerous benefits beyond pain alleviation, including small-to-moderate improvements in disability, quality of life, and physical function. Despite its efficacy, there is a lack of comprehensive research delineating the optimal intensity, duration, and type of exercise for maximal benefits; however, evidence suggests that sustained engagement in regular exercise or physical activity is necessary to achieve and maintain reductions in both clinical pain intensity ratings and the level that pain interferes with activities of daily living. Additionally, the precise mechanisms through which exercise mitigates pain remain poorly understood and likely vary based on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying each condition.
Relationship between Fear-Avoidance Beliefs and Reaction Time Changes Prior to and following Exercise-Induced Muscle Fatigue in Chronic Low Back Pain

Wenwu Xiao,Huaichun Yang,Zengming Hao,Menglin Li,Mengchu Zhao,Siyun Zhang,Guifang Zhang,Haian Mao,Chuhuai Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9982411

2024-01-27

Pain Research and Management

Abstract:Background. Reaction time is a reliable indicator of the velocity and efficiency of neuromuscular control and may be associated with fear-avoidance beliefs. However, the effect of exercise-induced muscle fatigue on reaction time in chronic low back pain (cLBP) and its relationship with fear-avoidance beliefs remains poorly understood. Objectives. This study aimed to reveal the relationship between fear-avoidance beliefs and reaction time changes before and after exercise-induced muscle fatigue in cLBP. Methods. Twenty-five patients with cLBP were tested by the Biering–Sorensen test (BST) to induce exhaustive muscle fatigue. Total reaction time (TRT), premotor time (PMT), and electromechanical delay (EMD) of dominated deltoid muscle were recorded by surface electromyography during the arm-raising task with visual cues before and after muscle fatigue. The mean difference (MD) of TRT (MDTRT), PMT (MDPMT), and EMD (MDEMD) was calculated from the changes before and after muscle fatigue. Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) was applied to evaluate fear-avoidance beliefs before muscle fatigue. In addition, the duration time of BST was recorded for each subject. Results. TRT and PMT of dominated deltoid muscle were prolonged after exercise-induced muscle fatigue (Z = 3.511, p < 0.001 ; t = 3.431, p = 0.001 ), while there was no statistical difference in EMD (Z = 1.029, p = 0.304 ). Correlation analysis showed that both the MDTRT and MDPMT were positively correlated with FABQ (r = 0.418, p = 0.042 ; r = 0.422, p = 0.040 ). Conclusions. These findings suggested that we should pay attention to both muscle fatigue-induced reaction time delay in cLBP management and the possible psychological mechanism involved in it. Furthermore, this study implied that FABQ-based psychotherapy might serve as a potential approach for cLBP treatment by improving reaction time delay. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2300074348.

clinical neurology
Physical Activity Levels in Persons With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sungwan Kim,Yin Wu,Neal R Glaviano,Linda S Pescatello

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241264494

2024-08-11

Sports Health

Abstract:Context: Pain and symptoms of patellofemoral pain (PFP) are often exacerbated during daily activities, which may result in reduced overall physical activity levels. Objective: To summarize the evidence for physical activity levels among persons with PFP compared with pain-free controls. Data sources: PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus were searched from January 1, 2000 to February 22, 2024. Study selection: Peer-reviewed studies published in English that measured physical activity subjectively or objectively in persons with PFP and pain-free controls. Study design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Level of evidence: Level 1. Data extraction: Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI are reported based on Hedges' g effect sizes. Results: From 23,745 records, 41 studies met the eligibility criteria. There was high-to-moderate-certainty evidence that persons with PFP reported higher physical activity levels compared with pain-free controls using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (SMD, 0.27; 95% CI 0.03, 0.51), whereas lower physical activity levels compared with pain-free controls using the Tegner Activity Scale (SMD, -0.31; 95% CI -0.57, -0.04). There was low-to-moderate-certainty evidence that there was no group difference in physical activity levels using the Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI -0.09, 0.44) or self-reported sports participation duration (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI -0.98, 0.05). There was high-certainty evidence that runners with PFP reported shorter running distances compared with pain-free runners (SMD, -0.36, 95% CI -0.57, -0.14). No data pooling was possible for objectively measured physical activity levels due to device heterogeneity (ie, different algorithms used to quantify the intensity of physical activity). Conclusion: Self-reported physical activity levels among persons with PFP were inconsistent depending on the physical activity measurement tool used or which specific physical activity was measured. Clinicians should integrate multiple physical activity assessment tools to determine the extent to which PFP influences physical activity levels. Trial registration: PROSPERO #CRD42022314598.
Exercise‐induced changes in central sensitization outcomes in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

Kexun Kenneth Chen,Paul Rolan,Mark Rowland Hutchinson,Cameron Dickson,Rutger Marinus Johannes de Zoete

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2277

2024-04-27

European Journal of Pain

Abstract:Background and Objective Temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are the two most commonly used clinical measures of central sensitization (CS). However, the effectiveness of exercise on TSP and CPM has yet to be evaluated. This review aims to investigate the effect of exercise alone on CS outcomes in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Databases and Data Treatment This is a systematic review and meta‐analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Cochrane databases were searched. Data were extracted based on the exercise modality and grouped into aerobic, resistance, isometric, or motor control modalities. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2, RoB2 for crossover trials and ROBINS‐I tools. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were conducted, with subgroup analysis conducted for each exercise modality. Results The meta‐analyses included thirteen studies, consisting of eight non‐randomized studies, three randomized controlled trials and three randomized crossover trials. Data were categorized into four subgroups for analyses based on exercise modality. No statistically significant effect existed for both TSP and conditioned pain modulation. However, motor control exercise was found to have a significant enhancing effect on conditioned pain modulation. No significant differences were found between the exercise subgroup for both TSP and conditioned pain modulation. Conclusions We did not find an overall effect of physical exercise on TSP and CPM. However, subgroup analysis shows favourable effects of motor control exercise in individuals with chronic neck pain. Future research should focus on exercise modality and dosage and their role in the mechanism involved in TSP and CPM in predefined populations. Significance Statement Results from this study found that motor control exercise has a significant enhancing effect on conditioned pain modulation, with subgroup analysis showing favourable effects of motor control exercise in individuals with chronic neck pain. This indicates that physical exercise may have a positive effect on central sensitisation in individual with chronic neck pain. However, differential effects may exist between different types of exercise. These findings will inform understanding of neurobiological effects underlying chronic neck pain and may guide the development of more effective, personalised treatments.

neurosciences,clinical neurology,anesthesiology
The Effects of Exercise on Decreasing Pain and Increasing Function in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Jamie L. Frye,Lindsay N. Ramey,Joseph M. Hart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738112441915

2012-04-26

Abstract:Context: Exercise or rest is commonly prescribed as treatment for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Study Selection: This study is based on Level I or II research studies examining the effects of exercise and rest on decreasing pain (visual analog scale) and increasing function (Kujala Scoring Questionnaire) using human participants. Articles were limited to those printed in English from PubMed (1966–September 2010), CINAHL (1982–September 2010), and SPORTDiscus (1972–September 2010). Data Extraction: Weighted aggregate effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from means and standard deviations extracted from 10 studies, resulting in an analysis of 433 patients. Results: A very large effect for exercise was found for patient-reported functional outcomes ( d = 2.19) and perceived pain ( d = −1.24) in treated patients, which were larger than functional outcomes ( d = 0.77) and pain ( d = −0.14) in controls. Short-term follow-up of 191 patients from 4 data sets in 2 studies revealed a large effect for functional outcomes ( d = 1.04) and pain ( d = −0.82) in patients who performed an exercise intervention. One study reported moderate effect sizes for functional outcomes ( d = 0.59) and pain ( d = −0.35) at 3 months postintervention. Conclusions: Exercise is the more effective treatment for immediate decrease in pain and increase in function although these differences appear to be less distinguishable over time.
Treatment interventions and assessment of fear-avoidance for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review protocol

Sam Yat Sun Tan,Anju Jaggi,Alex Tasker,Catherine Borra,Fraje Watson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.24308385

2024-06-03

Abstract:Introduction The Fear-Avoidance (FA) model aims to explain how an acute pain experience can develop into a persistent state. The FA model considers five core components: kinesiophobia, pain-related fear, catastrophisation, victimisation, and interpersonal social environment. Amongst these, kinesiophobia, tends to dominate the literature on chronic musculoskeletal pain. As a result, current reviews have not considered the other core components of the FA model when exploring its interventions. Moreover, several synonyms of the term kinesiophobia is not reflected in their search strategies. Coupled with the preference of particular study designs and outcome measures, this systematic review aims to provide and characterise an overview of treatment interventions that consider all study designs, relevant outcome measures, FA components, and FA component synonyms. Methods and analysis Eligible studies will be in English or with an available English translation from 1970 onwards. Databases to be searched include Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, The Allied and Complementary Database (AMED), PEDro, Web of Science, and grey literature. We will include studies involving participants ≥18 years old with chronic musculoskeletal pain, and interventions targeting FA and/or its components. Three review authors will independently screen papers using preestablished eligibility criteria and conduct assessments of risk of bias, with a fourth independent researcher employed to resolve disagreements where found. Qualitative synthesis techniques will be used to characterise the interventions. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) has been utilised to develop this protocol and will be conducted following completion of the systematic review to discuss and reflect on the findings. Ethics and dissemination This systematic review does not require ethical approval as existing data will be used and the PPI to be conducted is an involvement activity rather than study data. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and via national and international conferences. Prospero registration number [this protocol will be registered following peer review]
Pain Education and Virtual Reality Improves Pain, Pain-related Fear of Movement, and Trunk Kinematics in Individuals With Persistent Low Back Pain

Peter Window,Michelle McGrath,Daniel S. Harvie,Esther Smits,Venerina Johnston,Megan Murdoch,Trevor Russell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000001221

IF: 3.423

2024-07-13

The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract:To evaluate the effect of combining pain education and virtual reality (VR) exposure therapy using a cognitive-behavioral therapy-informed approach (virtual reality-based cognitive behavioral therapy [VR-CBT]) on pain intensity, fear of movement, and trunk movement in individuals with persistent low back pain.

clinical neurology,anesthesiology
The role of self-reported fear and disgust in the activation of behavioral harm avoidance related to medical settings

Béla Birkás,Botond Kiss,Carlos M. Coelho,András N. Zsidó

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074370

IF: 4.7

2023-01-25

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Introduction: Although adaptive defense mechanisms are useful in helping us avoid getting injured, they are also triggered by medical interventions and procedures, when avoidance is harmful. A body of previous results showed that both fear and disgust play a pivotal role in medical avoidance. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine the effects of experience, perceived control, and pain on medical avoidance with disgust and fear as mediating factors from an evolutionary perspective. Methods: We assessed participants' knowledge of and experience with medical procedures, former negative medical experiences, and health-related information; their life history strategy variation; pain-related fear and anxiety of medical procedures; perceived control over emotional reactions and extreme threats; disgust sensitivity; blood-injury-injection phobia and medical treatment avoidance. Results: We found that more knowledge, experience, and a slower life strategy were linked to a greater level of perceived control and attenuated emotional reactions. Further, better ability to control affective and stress reactions to negative experiences was linked to reduced disgust and fear of pain, and thus might mitigate the level of perceived threat, and diminish fear and disgust reactions. Discussion: More knowledge and experiences, better perceived control together with reduced disgust and fear of pain can decrease the probability of avoiding medical situations. Implications to treatment are discussed. Results support the importance of targeting these contextual factors in prevention to increase the likelihood of people attending regular screenings or seeking medical care when needed.

psychiatry

Effects of Exercise Training on Fear-Avoidance in Pain and Pain-Free Populations: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effects of exercise/physical activity on fear of movement in people with spine-related pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Meta‐analysis of the Associations of Elements of the Fear‐Avoidance Model of Chronic Pain with Negative Affect, Depression, Anxiety, Pain‐related Disability and Pain Intensity

What Is the Relationship of Fear Avoidance to Physical Function and Pain Intensity in Injured Athletes?

The effects of a 15-week physical exercise intervention on pain modulation in fibromyalgia: Increased pain-related processing within the cortico-striatal- occipital networks, but no improvement of exercise-induced hypoalgesia

Fear of pain and pain intensity: Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Brain Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia: To Find a Way Out from “Fear-Avoidance Belief”

eHealth Interventions for Managing Spine Pain—Benefits for Pain, Quality of Life, Catastrophizing and Fear Avoidance Beliefs: An Overview of Systematic Reviews With Meta-analysis

Graded In Vivo Exposure Treatment for Fear-Avoidant Pain Patients with Functional Disability: A Case Study

Pain-related fear of movement dynamics in individuals with and without low back pain participating in weightlifting and/or powerlifting training

Effects of therapeutic exercise on pain processing in people with chronic non-specific neck pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of exercise in adults with cancer pain: a systematic review and Network meta-analysis

Mindfulness training and exercise differentially impact fear extinction neurocircuitry

Exercise Training for Chronic Pain: Available Evidence, Current Recommendations, and Potential Mechanisms

Relationship between Fear-Avoidance Beliefs and Reaction Time Changes Prior to and following Exercise-Induced Muscle Fatigue in Chronic Low Back Pain

Physical Activity Levels in Persons With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Exercise‐induced changes in central sensitization outcomes in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

The Effects of Exercise on Decreasing Pain and Increasing Function in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Treatment interventions and assessment of fear-avoidance for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review protocol

Pain Education and Virtual Reality Improves Pain, Pain-related Fear of Movement, and Trunk Kinematics in Individuals With Persistent Low Back Pain

The role of self-reported fear and disgust in the activation of behavioral harm avoidance related to medical settings