Abstract:Sally Gadow's work is a sophisticated version of a familiar line of thought in nursing. She creates a chain of distinctions which is intended to differentiate cultural narratives, and particularly the 'science narrative', from imaginative narratives, especially poetry. Cultural narratives regulate and restrict; imaginative narratives are creative, liberating and potentially transcendent. These ideological effects are (supposedly) achieved through different structures of language. Scientific language, for example, is abstract and literal, while poetry is sensuous and metaphorical. In this paper, I argue that Gadow's way of discriminating between science and poetry fails. In the first place, the ideological valence she assigns to each of them is unwarranted. Science and poetry can both be harnessed to the project of emancipation, just as both can be incorporated in a strategy of oppression. In the second place, the claim that poetry and science are distinguished by their respective linguistic features--specifically, that one is metaphorical and the other literal--cannot be sustained. I illustrate this argument, as Gadow illustrates hers, by reference to the concept of embodiment, and consider whether Gadow is correct in thinking that poetry, not science, makes it possible for individuals (especially women) to 'reclaim the body'. I also suggest that Gadow's brand of postmodernism echoes Romanticism, whose defining characteristic was an insistent contrast between poetry and science. This is 'flip side' postmodernism, which merely opposes modernist values, preferring subjectivity to objectivity, feeling to rationality, and multiple realities to truth. It is less radical, and far less interesting, than 'remix' postmodernism, whose objective is not to reverse the polarities, but to reconfigure the entire circuit.

Feminism, Body, Sexuality and Time: A Conversation with Elizabeth Grosz

Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation

Bodies as open projects: reflections on gender and sexuality

Polyphonies of sexuality: Debates about theories/debates about paradigms

Feminist Film Studies 40 Years After ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’, a Triologue

Gender, Sexuality, and Embodiment in Digital Spheres

Bodies in Pain, Pleasure, and Flux: Transgressive Femininity in Japanese Media and Literature

The otherness of sexuality: excess

Forms, Voices, Networks: Feminism and the Media—Contingent curation, archival activism, frictional relations

Gadow's romanticism: science, poetry and embodiment in postmodern nursing

How We Do the Work Is the Work: Building an Intersectional Queer Praxis for Critical Feminist Scholarship

Deep Time, Dark Time

Body Politics in the COVID-19 Era from a Feminist Lens

Moving gender across, between and beyond the binaries: In conversation with Shona Bettany, Olimpia Burchiellaro and Rohan Venkatraman

The feminist frontier: on trans and feminism

Introduction to Creating Feminist Futures: Research Methodologies for New Times

Facing the skin: layers and counter-mirror subjectivities

Environmental Eros: the films of Barbara Hammer as "Creative Geographies"1

Finding the cosmos of intimacies: where pleasurable safe sex dances with liberation

Time, Death, and the Feminine: Levinas with Heidegger

A feminist opening of resilience: Elizabeth Grosz, Liberian Peace Huts and IR critiques