Brolucizumab for wet age‐related macular degeneration

Steve Chaplin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psb.1867

2020-09-01

Prescriber

Abstract:Brolucizumab (Beovu) is a new monoclonal antibody fragment targeting VEGF‐A for the treatment of neovascular (wet) age‐related macular degeneration (AMD). This article outlines its mechanism of action, place in therapy, clinical efficacy and adverse effects.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Brolucizumab: A Newly Developed Anti-VEGF Molecule for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Ramin Tadayoni,Laura Sararols,Georges Weissgerber,Rohini Verma,Andreas Clemens,Frank G Holz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000513048

Ophthalmologica

Abstract:Background: Despite the success of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs), currently, there is a need for highly effective compounds that can alleviate the burden of managing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Purpose: To review the milestones in the molecular and clinical development of brolucizumab, the first single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) designed specifically for intraocular use in humans. Methods: In this article, we summarize the preclinical and current clinical evidence of brolucizumab administration with an overview of the other treatment regimens and additional indications under investigation. Results: The unique molecular design of brolucizumab led to a low molecular weight of only 26 kDa, allowing for a concentrated molar dose of 1 intravitreal injection compared with other anti-VEGF agents. Phase I and II clinical trial outcomes validated the efficacy of brolucizumab in the treatment of nAMD with signals of a more durable treatment effect. The pivotal phase III trials, HAWK and HARRIER, which included a total of 1,817 patients, established that brolucizumab can be administered every 3 months while maintaining disease control. Conclusions: The preclinical and clinical data on brolucizumab provide evidence of sustained disease control with longer injection intervals, thus potentially reducing the treatment burden in patients with nAMD.
Brolucizumab: a novel anti-VEGF humanized single-chain antibody fragment for treating w-AMD

Lorenzo Ferro Desideri,Carlo Enrico Traverso,Massimo Nicolò

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2021.1915278

Abstract:Introduction: Wet age-related macular degeneration (w-AMD) represents the leading cause of visual impairment in the elderly in the developed countries. Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs are currently considered as the first-line treatment option for treating w-AMD; however, the frequent injection intervals have lit the way to investigate novel anti-VEGF agents allowing a more extended treatment regimen. Brolucizumab is a single-chain antibody fragment targeting all the isoforms of VEGF-A. Phase III HAWK and HARRIER trials have shown a longer durability and superior anatomical outcomes as compared with the standard of care by adopting a quarterly regimen for treating w-AMD. Brolucizumab has been approved in Europe, USA, and Japan for the management of w-AMD. Areas covered: This article presents an overview of w-AMD and investigates the progress of brolucizumab through clinical trials. It offers insights into where brolucizumab may be placed in the current market of anti-VEGF agents and its potential advantages over the previous molecules adopted for treating w-AMD. Expert opinion: The possibility of administering brolucizumab with more dilated treatment intervals represents an important advantage to decrease the treatment burden and improve patient compliance. Brolucizumab represents a possible drug switching option in non-responding patients to other anti-VEGF drugs.
Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Brolucizumab: An 8-Month Post-Marketing Surveillance Analysis

Nicholas J Saba,Scott D Walter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S425709

2023-09-20

Abstract:Importance: Brolucizumab (Beovu®) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). Brolucizumab was marketed for its noninferiority to aflibercept and its potential for greater durability. However, post-marketing utilization has been tempered by safety concerns. Objective: We evaluate the visual and anatomic efficacy of brolucizumab, examine changes in treatment intervals after switching to brolucizumab, and estimate the incidence of drug-related adverse events in the real world. Design setting and participants: This was a retrospective consecutive case series of 626 eyes (543 patients) with nvAMD treated with 1438 brolucizumab injections at a single retina practice between 10/1/2019 and 5/15/2020. Main outcomes and measures: Changes in visual acuity (VA); anatomic outcomes assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) including central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and serous pigment epithelial detachment (sPED) on foveal line scans; treatment intervals before and after receiving brolucizumab; and the incidence of brolucizumab-related adverse events. Results: The majority of eyes (N = 531, 89.7%) had received prior anti-VEGF therapy with aflibercept, ranibizumab, and/or bevacizumab. VA improved in treatment-naïve eyes (+3.7 letters, p = 0.04), and was maintained in previously treated eyes. There were significant improvements in all anatomic outcomes in both groups (p < 0.001). We observed a 4.8% incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) and a 0.6% incidence of retinal vasculitis. The average treatment interval increased from 6.3 to 6.8 weeks (p = 0.001). Conclusions and relevance: Brolucizumab treatment was associated with VA improvement in naïve eyes and maintenance of VA in previously treated eyes. Switching to brolucizumab was associated with improved anatomic outcomes and extended treatment intervals in most eyes. We observed a similar incidence of IOI and a lower incidence of retinal vasculitis compared to the Safety Review Committee's analysis of HAWK and HARRIER.
Side Effects of Brolucizumab

Tahmineh Motevasseli,Saeed Mohammadi,Fatemeh Abdi,William R Freeman,William R. Freeman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i4.9757

2021-10-25

Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research

Abstract:Age-related macular degeneration and its complication, subretinal neovascularization, are common causes of progressive, irreversible impairment of central vision. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has improved the visual outcome and provided an evolution in the treatment of retinal disease. The current four anti- VEGF drugs – pegaptanib, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab – have been administered for many years. A new anti-VEGF agent, brolucizumab, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in late 2019 for the treatment of wet agerelated macular degeneration. Brolucizumab is a novel single-chain fragment variable antibody that inhibits all isoforms of VEGF-A and has been suggested to have more tissue penetration. Despite all the benefits, there are some reports of serious side effects that need to be understood in managing patients. Brolucizumab has been reported to cause occlusive retinal vasculitis in the setting of intraocular inflammation, which has not been seen in other anti-VEGF medications. A PubMed and Scopus search was performed and all article types were included. In the present article, we have reviewed the reported side effects of brolucizumab.
Brolucizumab for pre-treated patients with choroidal neovascularization and signs of tachyphylaxis to aflibercept and bevacizumab

Agnes Boltz,Katharina Radunsky,Birgit Weingessel,Veronika Pia Vécsei-Marlovits

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05634-5

Abstract:Purpose: Treatment of choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration is a challenging topic since an increasing number of patients show reduced morphological response to conventional treatment with intravitreal injections. The present study tested the hypothesis that the newly introduced anti-VEGF antibody brolucizumab does not only show promising results in pre-treated patients but is also a viable option in cases of tachyphylaxis to aflibercept or bevacizumab. Methods: Thirty-six eyes of 34 patients with a history of at least 10 anti-VEGF injections as well as persistent retinal fluid following the past 5 monthly injections with aflibercept and bevacizumab prior to first treatment with brolucizumab were included in the study. Morphological and functional treatment response was compared before and after switching to brolucizumab. Results: Mean best-corrected visual acuity did not significantly change after treatment with brolucizumab. In contrast, central retinal thickness significantly decreased 4 weeks after treatment with brolucizumab from 340.36 to 282.22 µm (p < 0.001) as well as pigment epithelial detachment from 346.73 to 280.47 µm (p < 0.001). In 24 eyes (66.67%), complete resolution of intra-and subretinal fluid was observed after a single dose of brolucizumab. No serious adverse events, such as intraocular inflammation and retinal vasculitis, were reported after a single injection of brolucizumab. Conclusion: Brolucizumab is not only effective in treatment-naïve patients as shown in the pivotal HAWK and Harrier trials, but also in pre-treated patients as seen in the present study. Our data also suggest that brolucizumab is potent in patients with signs of tachyphylaxis to other anti-VEGF agents and thus a viable treatment option.
Occlusive retinal vasculitis and scleritis following brolucizumab treatment: A case report

Shunpei Onagawa,Masahiro Miura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040154

IF: 1.6

2024-10-30

Medicine

Abstract:Brolucizumab (Beovu; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) is a next-generation anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy that inhibits all vascular endothelial growth factor-A isoforms. In 2 parallel phase 3 randomized clinical trials—HAWK and HARRIER—brolucizumab demonstrated improved tissue penetration, a greater drying effect, and prolonged durability for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) compared with aflibercept. [ 1 ] Based on the results of these clinical trials, brolucizumab was approved as a treatment for neovascular AMD in various countries, including the United States and Japan.

medicine, general & internal
Efficacy and safety of Brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ran Dou,Jian Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17561

IF: 3.061

2024-06-21

PeerJ

Abstract:Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and methods: Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. Stata and RevMan5.4 were applied for meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Data on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CSFT), presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and/or subretinal fluid (SRF), participants with ≥1 serious adverse events, and participants with ≥1 adverse events were analyzed. Results: Six studies were finally included. Meta-analysis showed statistical differences in BCVA [SMD = -0.65, 95% CI [-0.17 to -0.23], P < 0.05], the presence of IRF and/or SRF [RR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.56-0.79], P < 0.05], and the safety of participants with ≥1 serious adverse events [RR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.39-0.84], P < 0.05] between the experimental group and the control group. However, no statistical differences were observed in CSFT [SMD = -1.16, 95% CI [-2.79 to 0.47], P > 0.05] or the safety of participants with ≥1 adverse events [RR = 1.07, 95% CI [0.97-1.17], P > 0.05]. Conclusions: Compared to other anti-VEGF drugs such as Aflibercept and Ranibizumab, intravitreal injection of 6 mg Brolucizumab is more effective and safer for n-AMD, especially in the presence of IRF and/or SRF, and for participants with ≥1 serious adverse events.
MERLIN: Two-Year Results of Brolucizumab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistent Retinal Fluid

David M Brown,Glenn J Jaffe,Charles C Wykoff,Eser Adiguzel,Jeffrey S Heier,Arshad M Khanani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.022

IF: 14.277

2024-08-23

Ophthalmology

Abstract:Purpose: To report the safety and efficacy of brolucizumab (Beovu®) 6 mg vs. aflibercept (Eylea®) 2 mg administered every 4 weeks in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and persistent retinal fluid after the Week 52 primary endpoint analysis (from Week 52 up to Week 104, post-study termination). Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked Phase 3a study. Participants: Participants with recalcitrant nAMD (persistent residual retinal fluid despite previous frequent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment). Methods: Study eyes were randomized 2:1 to intravitreal brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks for 100 weeks, or until study termination. Main outcome measures: All available efficacy (analysis of noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], central subfield thickness [CST], fluid-free status [no intraretinal fluid and no subretinal fluid]), and safety data up to study termination, including data up to Week 104 for those participants who completed the study prior to its termination. All P values after Week 52 were nominal and reflect observed data for the efficacy analyses. Results: Brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior to aflibercept 2 mg in mean BCVA change from baseline to Week 104 (least squares mean difference, -0.4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 3.0; P = 0.0169). The proportion of eyes with ≥15-letter loss was 6.2% for brolucizumab and 4.7% for aflibercept. (P = 0.0014), and a greater proportion of eyes were fluid free at Week 104 (52.5% brolucizumab vs. 28.2% aflibercept; 95% CI, 11.9-37.3; P < 0.001) in eyes treated with brolucizumab vs. aflibercept. Incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was 11.5% (0.8% and 2.2%) for brolucizumab vs 6.1% (0% and 0.6%) for aflibercept, respectively. Conclusions: Consistent with 52-week results, brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior in mean BCVA change with anatomic outcomes superior to aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks from baseline to Week 104 or study termination. The incidence of IOI, including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was higher with brolucizumab vs. aflibercept; therefore, brolucizumab should not be used more frequently than every 8 weeks following the loading regimen.
Faricimab for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Lorenzo Ferro Desideri,Carlo Enrico Traverso,Massimo Nicolò,Marion R. Munk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15051413

IF: 6.525

2023-05-06

Pharmaceutics

Abstract:Nowadays; intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs are considered the first-line therapeutic strategy for treating macular exudative diseases; including wet age-related macular degeneration (w-AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Despite the important clinical achievements obtained by anti-VEGF drugs in the management of w-AMD and DME; some limits still remain; including high treatment burden; the presence of unsatisfactory results in a certain percentage of patients and long-term visual acuity decline due to complications such as macular atrophy and fibrosis. Targeting the angiopoietin/Tie (Ang/Tie) pathway beyond the VEGF pathway may be a possible therapeutic strategy; which may has the potential to solve some of the previous mentioned challenges. Faricimab is a new; bispecific antibody targeting both VEGF-A and the Ang-Tie/pathway. It was approved by FDA and; more recently; by EMA for treating w-AMD and DME. Results from phase III trials TENAYA and LUCERNE (w-AMD) and RHINE and YOSEMITE (DME) have shown the potential of faricimab to maintain clinical efficacy with more prolonged treatment regimens compared to aflibercept (12 or 16 weeks) with a a good safety profile.

pharmacology & pharmacy
Review on the Safety and Efficacy of Brolucizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration From Major Studies and Real-World Data

Nishant V Radke,Shaheeda Mohamed,Richard B Brown,Ilyana Ibrahim,Jay Chhablani,Shivam V Amin,Chi-Wai Tsang,Marten E Brelen,Nikhil S Raichand,Dong Fang,Shaochong Zhang,Hong Dai,Guy Li Jia Chen,Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung,Seenu M Hariprasad,Taraprasad Das,Dennis S C Lam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000602

Abstract:Frequent antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) often lead to poor compliance and suboptimal outcomes. A longer-acting agent has been a pressing unmet need until recently. Brolucizumab, an antivascular endothelial growth factor agent, is a single-chain antibody fragment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 8, 2019, for treating nAMD. It delivers more molecules at equivalent volumes of aflibercept, thus achieving a longer-lasting effect. We reviewed literature published in English between January 2016 and October 2022 from MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, and Google scholar using the keywords: "Brolucizumab, real-world data, intraocular inflammation (IOI), safety, and efficacy". Brolucizumab showed reduced injection frequency, better anatomic outcomes, and noninferior vision gains compared with aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER studies. However, post hoc studies on brolucizumab revealed a higher-than-expected incidence of IOI, leading to the early termination of 3 studies: MERLIN, RAPTOR, and RAVEN for nAMD, branch retinal vein occlusion, and central retinal vein occlusion, respectively. Contrastingly real-world data showed encouraging outcomes in terms of fewer IOI cases. The subsequent amendment of the treatment protocol resulted in reduced IOI. Thereafter US FDA approved its use in diabetic macular edema on June 1, 2022. Based on major studies and real-world data, this review shows that brolucizumab is effective for treating naive and refractory nAMD. The risk of IOI is acceptable and manageable, but proper preinjection screening and high-vigilance care of IOI are needed. More studies are warranted to evaluate further the incidence, best prevention, and treatment measures for IOI.
[Effectiveness and safety of brolucizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration]

A N Kulikov,V R Zhalimova,N A Nekrash,Y A Kalinicheva,A S Vasilyev,D S Maltsev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414004140

Abstract:Purpose: This study analyzes the effectiveness and safety of brolucizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in real clinical practice. Material and methods: The study included patients with nAMD who received brolucizumab treatment and evaluated the changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), macular volume, as well as the number of injections and adverse events. Result: The group of previously treated patients included 28 subjects (28 eyes) that were switched to brolucizumab with a loading phase. By 12 months, BCVA changed from 0.43±0.29 to 0.33±0.27 LogMAR (p=0.11), CRT decreased from 281.5±58.2 to 239.9±45.6 µm (p=0.02). The group of previously untreated patients included 29 subjects (29 eyes). By 12 months, BCVA changed from 0.47±0.32 to 0.40±0.30 LogMAR (p=0.09), CRT decreased from 333.2±77.3 to 226.2±49.6 µm (p<0.001). Patients received 6.3±0.7 injections. In this group, baseline choroidal thickness showed a statistically significant correlation with final visual acuity (r=0.54; p<0.05) and CRT (r= -0.5; p<0.05). The group of previously treated patients switched without a loading phase included 18 patients (18 eyes). By 6 months, BCVA changed from 0.42±0.2 to 0.37±0.26 LogMAR (p=0.42). CRT remained stable at 285.6±56.9 µm (p=0.97). No adverse events related to intraocular inflammation were reported during the course of 385 injections. Conclusion: Brolucizumab therapy helps achieve significant anatomical and functional improvements in real clinical practice both in patients switched from previous treatments and in treatment-naïve patients. Greater baseline choroidal thickness may be associated with better anatomical and functional outcomes with brolucizumab treatment.
Brolucizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Real-life outcomes from a tertiary care eye hospital

Lorenzo Fabozzi,Saad Younis,Sagnik Sen,Inés López-Cuenca,Filomena Palmieri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_562_24

2024-09-10

Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:Abstract Purpose: To report real-world clinical evidence of brolucizumab in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: This study included 37 eyes with nAMD treated with intravitreal injections of brolucizumab. The main outcomes were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes, central retinal thickness (CRT), and serious ocular adverse events. Intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF), subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs), hyperreflective foci, macular atrophy, and retinal pigment epithelial tears were evaluated. Results: The mean BCVA of all patients showed a post-treatment value of 0.47 ± 0.33 log of minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR), compared to a baseline measure of 0.50 ± 0.28 LogMAR ( P = 0.372). For treatment-naïve patients, a non-statistically significant improvement in BCVA was observed ( P = 0.116). Both treatment-naive patients and the entire patient cohort exhibited a statistically significant improvement in the mean CRT after injections. Majority of patients exhibited improvements in optical coherence tomography findings, specifically in the resolution of IRF, SRF, SHRM, and PEDs. Four eyes experienced ocular adverse events in the form of intraocular inflammation. Conclusion: Brolucizumab did not yield a substantial improvement in BCVA, but it exhibited efficacy in reducing CRT in the entire study population and treatment-naive patients with nAMD. Our study identified intraocular inflammation as a significant adverse event with brolucizumab. Thus, precise patient selection, education, and vigilant inflammation monitoring are crucial for patients undergoing this treatment.

ophthalmology
Efficacy and safety of one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema.

Xiaoyun Fang,Hirokazu Sakaguchi,Fumi Gomi,Yusuke Oshima,Miki Sawa,Motokazu Tsujikawa,Yasushi Ikuno,Motohiro Kamei,Shunji Kusaka,Yasuo Tano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01575.x

2008-01-01

Acta Ophthalmologica

Abstract:To assess the efficacy, duration of effect and safety of one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema (DMO).Bevacizumab (1 mg/0.04 ml) was injected intravitreally into eyes with DMO (29 with and nine without previous treatments). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured; slit-lamp examination, macular biomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography were performed before and at 2-4, 8 and 12 weeks post-injection. Best corrected VA and CRT were analysed in both groups.In the non-pretreated group, mean BCVA improved from 0.76 +/- 0.33 (baseline) to 0.57 +/- 0.30 and 0.54 +/- 0.27 at 2-4 weeks and 8 weeks post-injection, respectively (p = 0.02, p = 0.014, paired t-test). Mean CRT decreased from 632.4 +/- 196.0 microm (baseline) to 392.3 +/- 113.6 microm and 370.4 +/- 141.7 microm at the same time-points, respectively (p = 0.01, p = 0.01). There was no difference in BCVA or CRT at 12 weeks. In the pretreated group, mean BCVA improved from 0.62 +/- 0.30 (baseline) to 0.53 +/- 0.33 at 2-4 weeks post-injection (p = 0.01), and mean CRT decreased from 583.9 +/- 180.7 microm (baseline) to 404.1 +/- 197.9 microm at 2-4 weeks post-injection (p < 0.001). Mean BCVA was unchanged at 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-injection, although mean CRT remained lower at 8 weeks (p = 0.004). No ocular or systemic side-effects developed during follow-up.One intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for DMO seems to be effective and safe in both eyes that have been treated previously and eyes that have not. The therapeutic effect is temporary and repeat treatment may be needed.
Early OCT Angiography Changes of Macular Neovascularization in Patients with Exudative AMD Treated with Brolucizumab in a Real-World Setting

Anne Rübsam,Saskia Rau,Daniel Pilger,Oliver Zeitz,Antonia M Joussen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2659714

2022-03-25

Abstract:Background: To report on the short-term outcome of intravitreal brolucizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: This is a prospective, interventional, monocentric study on 10 eyes of 10 patients with a treatment-naïve neovascular AMD. Patients were treated according to the HAWK and HARRIER trials. After loading with 3 monthly injections, eyes received an injection 12 weeks after the upload (q12w) or were adjusted to an 8 week interval (q8w), if disease activity was present 8 weeks after the upload. Main outcome measures were the change in central retinal thickness (CRT) assessed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), the change in macular neovascularization (MNV) size on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 8 and 12 weeks after the upload. We further assessed clinical parameters that predict the treatment response at baseline based on the need of q8w or q12w injections after the upload. Results: CRT decreased significantly from 461.7 ± 82.9 μm to 343.6 ± 74.3 μm (p=0.004) 12 weeks after the upload. The MNV size decreased significantly from 0.85 ± 1.1 to 0.75 ± 1.2 mm2 (p=0.022). BCVA improved from 0.67 ± 0.4 to 0.55 ± 0.4logMAR but without statistical significance. MNV size in eyes on q12w was considerably smaller compared to that in eyes on q8w (0.54 ± 0.7 mm2 vs. 1.98 ± 2.4 mm2). The percentage of eyes without any persistent fluid was 70% (7/10 eyes). Conclusions: Brolucizumab appears to be a valuable tool for the management of patients with nAMD. Furthermore, MNV size at baseline might serve as an early predictor of treatment response.
Guidance on brolucizumab management recommendations

A Fonollosa,R Gallego-Pinazo,L Sararols,A Adán,M López-Gálvez,M S Figueroa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2022.05.006

Abstract:Purpose: Brolucizumab, a new generation anti-VEGF, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in AMD in the pivotal HAWK and HARRIER trials. Post-marketing, previously undetected adverse events related to intraocular inflammation have been reported. An independent post hoc review of the pivotal trials puts the rate of IOI at 4.6%. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of recommendations for implementing the management of brolucizumab in clinical practice. Methods: The recommendations made by the authors are based on their clinical experience, critical review of (i) the pivotal trials, the post-hoc analysis of the Safety Review Committee, (ii), and (iii) the published literature. Results: In the pivotal trials, brolucizumab showed sustained functional gains, superior anatomical outcomes with potentially longer intervals between injections and a well-tolerated overall safety profile. Adverse events reported post-marketing include retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion. Based on the available information, experts recommend (i) ruling out non-recommended patient profiles (prior history of ORI), (ii) screening the patient prior to each injection to rule out active ORI, (iii) monitoring the patient for early warning signs, and (iv) treating immediately should any adverse events develop. Conclusions: The adverse events reported are rare, but may be associated with severe and irreversible loss of visual acuity. The recommendations made are intended to facilitate the management of brolucizumab in the routine practice of retinologists, to ensure patient safety and, should any adverse events occur, to minimise their impact on vision.
Efficacy Outcomes of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients with Early Residual Fluid

Rishi P Singh,Chirag Jhaveri,Charles C Wykoff,Richard P Gale,Giovanni Staurenghi,Tomohiro Iida,Adrian Koh,Guruprasad B,Kinfemichael Gedif,Michael Singer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.12.014

Abstract:Objective: To compare the outcomes of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with early residual fluid in the HAWK and HARRIER studies. Design: Post hoc analysis using pooled data from the phase 3 studies HAWK (NCT02307682) and HARRIER (NCT02434328). Participants: The early residual fluid cohort for this post hoc analysis consisted of patients treated with either brolucizumab 6 mg (n = 730 patients) or aflibercept 2 mg (n = 729 patients) and who had the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), or both verified by spectral-domain OCT at the week 12 clinic visit. Methods: After 3 initial monthly doses, patients treated with brolucizumab received injections every 12 weeks (q12w) or every 8 weeks (q8w), depending on the neovascular age-related macular degeneration disease activity, whereas patients treated with aflibercept received fixed q8w dosing. Main outcome measures: The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CST) from the baseline to that at weeks 48 and 96, the proportion of patients treated with brolucizumab remaining on q12w dosing to week 96, and the change in fluid status at weeks 48 and 96. Results: All analyses were based on 149 of 730 (20.4%) patients treated with brolucizumab and 217 of 729 (29.8%) patients treated with aflibercept with spectral-domain OCT-verified IRF, SRF, or both at their week 12 visit. The best-corrected visual acuity improvements from baseline at weeks 48 and 96 were numerically better for brolucizumab than for aflibercept (least square mean [standard error] 7.9 ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 ± 0.9 and 7.4 ± 1.3 vs. 2.9 ± 1.1 letters, respectively). The CST reductions from baseline at weeks 48 and 96 were consistently greater with brolucizumab than with aflibercept (least square mean [standard error], μm: -194.9 ± 13.7 vs. -123.9 ± 11.3; and -201.1 ± 14.5 vs. -134.2 ± 12.0, respectively). At weeks 48 and 96, patients treated with brolucizumab had a 40.4% and 31.3% probability of remaining on q12w dosing intervals, respectively. Fewer patients treated with brolucizumab had remaining IRF, SRF, or both at weeks 48 and 96 than patients treated with aflibercept (59.1% vs. 75.1% and 49.0% vs. 60.4%, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with early residual fluid, defined as spectral-domain OCT-verified IRF, SRF, or both at the week 12 clinic visit, brolucizumab resolved the early residual fluid and reduced CST more effectively than aflibercept, resulting in greater best-corrected visual acuity improvements through week 96 of anti-VEGF treatment.
Real-World Experience with Brolucizumab Compared to Aflibercept in Treatment-Naïve and Therapy-Refractory Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

Anne Rübsam,Leopold Hössl,Saskia Rau,Alexander Böker,Oliver Zeitz,Antonia M. Joussen,Rübsam,Hössl,Rau,Böker,Zeitz,Joussen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061819

IF: 3.9

2024-03-21

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: To report on the outcome of intravitreal brolucizumab compared to aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Prospective, observational, study in 35 eyes of 24 patients with a loading dose of five injections of 6 mg brolucizumab every 6 weeks (q6w, treatment-naïve eyes) or a minimum of two injections of brolucizumab q6w after the switch (recalcitrant DME eyes), followed by a treat and extend (T&E) regimen. The results were compared with 40 eyes of 31 DME patients who were treated with aflibercept. The data were obtained from the Berlin Macula Registry. The primary outcome measure was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 36. Secondary outcome measures were the change in central retinal thickness (CRT) and the treatment intervals until week 36. Results: BCVA increased significantly in treatment-naïve DME eyes treated with either brolucizumab (+0.12 logMAR, +6.4 letters, p = 0.03) or aflibercept (+0.19 logMAR, +9.5 letters, p = 0.001). In recalcitrant DME eyes, BCVA also increased significantly after switching to brolucizumab (+0.1 logMAR, +5 letters, p = 0.006) or aflibercept (+0.11 logMAR, +5.5 letters, p = 0.02). All treatment-naïve and recalcitrant DME eyes had a significant decrease in CRT after treatment with brolucizumab (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001) or aflibercept (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.03). At week 36, the mean treatment interval for brolucizumab was 11.3 weeks, while for aflibercept, it was 6.5 weeks for treatment-naïve eyes and 9.3 weeks vs. 5.3 weeks for pretreated eyes. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, patients with treatment-naïve and recalcitrant DME showed a favorable response to brolucizumab and aflibercept therapy, with a reduced injection frequency after brolucizumab treatment.

medicine, general & internal
Safety Outcomes of Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Results From the IRIS Registry and Komodo Healthcare Map

Arshad M Khanani,Marco A Zarbin,Mark R Barakat,Thomas A Albini,Peter K Kaiser,Guruprasad B,Neetu Agashivala,Justin S Yu,Charles C Wykoff,Mathew W MacCumber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.4585

2022-01-01

Abstract:Importance: Limited data exist on the real-world safety outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with brolucizumab (Beovu). Objective: To determine the real-world incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis (RV) and/or retinal vascular occlusion (RO), for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who underwent brolucizumab treatment. Additionally, potential risk factors associated with these adverse events were evaluated. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry and Komodo Healthcare Map. Patients initiating and receiving 1 or more brolucizumab injections from October 8, 2019, to June 5, 2020, with up to 6 months of follow-up were included. Intervention: Brolucizumab injections. Main outcome and measures: Incidence of IOI (including RV) and/or RO and RV and/or RO and risk stratification for the identified risk factors. Results: Of 10 654 and 11 161 included eyes (from the IRIS Registry and Komodo Health database, respectively), the median follow-up times were 97 and 95 days. Most eyes switched from another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent (9686 of 10 654 [90.9%] and 10 487 of 11 161 [94.0%], respectively), most commonly aflibercept (7160 of 9686 [73.9%] and 7156 of 10 487 [68.2%]), and most were from women (6105 of 10 654 [57.3%] and 6452 of 11 161 [57.8%]). The overall incidence of IOI and/or RO was 2.4% (255 of 10 654 eyes) and 2.4% (268 of 11 161 eyes) for the IRIS and Komodo groups, respectively, and RV and/or RO, 0.6% (59 of 10 654 eyes and 63 of 11 161 eyes), respectively. Patients with a history of IOI and/or RO in the 12 months before brolucizumab initiation had an increased observed risk rate (8.7% [95% CI, 6.0%-11.4%] and 10.6% [95% CI, 7.5%-13.7%]) for an IOI and/or RO event in the 6 months following the first brolucizumab treatment compared with patients without prior IOI and/or RO (2.0% in both data sets). There was an increased estimated incidence rate in women (2.9% [95% CI, 2.5%-3.3%] and 3.0% [95% CI, 2.6%-3.4%]) compared with men (1.3% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%] and 1.4% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%]), but this risk was not as large as that of a prior IOI and/or RO. Similar findings were observed for patients with RV and/or RO events. Conclusions and relevance: The incidence rate of IOI and/or RO was approximately 2.4%. Patient eyes with IOI and/or RO in the 12 months prior to first brolucizumab injection had the highest observed risk rate for IOI and/or RO in the early months after the first brolucizumab treatment. However, given study limitations, the identified risk factors cannot be used as predictors of IOI and/or RO events, and causality with brolucizumab cannot be assessed.
Gains in the current understanding of managing neovascular AMD with brolucizumab

Bahram Bodaghi,Arshad M Khanani,Ramin Khoramnia,Carlos Pavesio,Quan Dong Nguyen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-023-00369-8

2023-11-23

Abstract:Background: Unresolved retinal fluid and high injection burden are major challenges for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Brolucizumab addresses these challenges by providing robust vision gains and superior fluid resolution, with the potential for longer treatment intervals. Brolucizumab has been associated with adverse events of retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion typically in the presence of intraocular inflammation (IOI). To define the incidence of the adverse events, Novartis convened an external safety review committee, which found a rate of 4.6% for definite or probable IOI, 3.3% for retinal vasculitis, and 2.1% for retinal vascular occlusion in the HAWK and HARRIER trials. Novartis also established a coalition to explore 4 areas regarding the adverse events: root cause, patient characterization, event mitigation and vigilance, and treatment protocols for the adverse events. Based on the coalition findings, a risk mitigation framework was developed. Prior to initiating treatment with brolucizumab, it is important to weigh the potential benefit against risk of adverse events and to consider patient risk factors such as prior history of IOI and/or retinal vascular occlusion. To mitigate the potential for IOI-related adverse events, it is important to conduct a thorough dilated eye examination before each injection and closely monitor patients throughout treatment. Patients should be educated on symptoms of IOI to monitor for. Brolucizumab should not be injected in the presence of active IOI. If an adverse event is identified, prompt and intensive treatment should be considered. Conclusion: Progress has been made in understanding how to mitigate IOI-related adverse events following treatment with brolucizumab.
Functional and anatomical outcomes of brolucizumab for nAMD in a real-life setting

Marco Rocco Pastore,Serena Milan,Gabriella Cirigliano,Daniele Tognetto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51315-0

IF: 4.6

2024-01-18

Scientific Reports

Abstract:To report long-term outcomes of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatment. Records from 74 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Both naïve eyes and those previously treated with other antiVEGF agents were included. Primary outcomes included variation in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) dimensions. Outcomes were reviewed after the loading phase, at week 24, and at last follow-up. IOI occurrence represented the secondary outcome. BCVA improved significantly in both groups. In switched eyes, IRF and SRF were significantly reduced at every timepoint, with CST reduction from week 24 (p = 0.005). In naïve group, CST decreased from the loading phase (p = 0.006) and all patients showed dry macula from week 24. A significant reduction in PED maximum high was demonstrated in both groups. In seven naïve eyes, PED completely reabsorbed; a slight increase in PED horizontal maximal diameter was also observed from week 24. IOI occurred in 5.4% of cases. In conclusion, brolucizumab showed a strong drying effect, permitting functional improvement together with fluid reabsorption and an encouraging modification of PED dimension, especially on naïve patients. These results together with the extension of treatment intervals make brolucizumab an efficient therapeutic strategy for nAMD.

multidisciplinary sciences

Brolucizumab for wet age‐related macular degeneration

Brolucizumab: A Newly Developed Anti-VEGF Molecule for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Brolucizumab: a novel anti-VEGF humanized single-chain antibody fragment for treating w-AMD

Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Brolucizumab: An 8-Month Post-Marketing Surveillance Analysis

Side Effects of Brolucizumab

Brolucizumab for pre-treated patients with choroidal neovascularization and signs of tachyphylaxis to aflibercept and bevacizumab

Occlusive retinal vasculitis and scleritis following brolucizumab treatment: A case report

Efficacy and safety of Brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

MERLIN: Two-Year Results of Brolucizumab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistent Retinal Fluid

Faricimab for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Review on the Safety and Efficacy of Brolucizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration From Major Studies and Real-World Data

[Effectiveness and safety of brolucizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration]

Brolucizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Real-life outcomes from a tertiary care eye hospital

Efficacy and safety of one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema.

Early OCT Angiography Changes of Macular Neovascularization in Patients with Exudative AMD Treated with Brolucizumab in a Real-World Setting

Guidance on brolucizumab management recommendations

Efficacy Outcomes of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients with Early Residual Fluid

Real-World Experience with Brolucizumab Compared to Aflibercept in Treatment-Naïve and Therapy-Refractory Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

Safety Outcomes of Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Results From the IRIS Registry and Komodo Healthcare Map

Gains in the current understanding of managing neovascular AMD with brolucizumab

Functional and anatomical outcomes of brolucizumab for nAMD in a real-life setting