Brolucizumab for pre-treated patients with choroidal neovascularization and signs of tachyphylaxis to aflibercept and bevacizumab

Agnes Boltz,Katharina Radunsky,Birgit Weingessel,Veronika Pia Vécsei-Marlovits
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05634-5
Abstract:Purpose: Treatment of choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration is a challenging topic since an increasing number of patients show reduced morphological response to conventional treatment with intravitreal injections. The present study tested the hypothesis that the newly introduced anti-VEGF antibody brolucizumab does not only show promising results in pre-treated patients but is also a viable option in cases of tachyphylaxis to aflibercept or bevacizumab. Methods: Thirty-six eyes of 34 patients with a history of at least 10 anti-VEGF injections as well as persistent retinal fluid following the past 5 monthly injections with aflibercept and bevacizumab prior to first treatment with brolucizumab were included in the study. Morphological and functional treatment response was compared before and after switching to brolucizumab. Results: Mean best-corrected visual acuity did not significantly change after treatment with brolucizumab. In contrast, central retinal thickness significantly decreased 4 weeks after treatment with brolucizumab from 340.36 to 282.22 µm (p < 0.001) as well as pigment epithelial detachment from 346.73 to 280.47 µm (p < 0.001). In 24 eyes (66.67%), complete resolution of intra-and subretinal fluid was observed after a single dose of brolucizumab. No serious adverse events, such as intraocular inflammation and retinal vasculitis, were reported after a single injection of brolucizumab. Conclusion: Brolucizumab is not only effective in treatment-naïve patients as shown in the pivotal HAWK and Harrier trials, but also in pre-treated patients as seen in the present study. Our data also suggest that brolucizumab is potent in patients with signs of tachyphylaxis to other anti-VEGF agents and thus a viable treatment option.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?