Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS:The clinical data of 60 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent surgical treatment from January 2018 to October 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into OLIF groups and TLIF group according to different surgical methods. The 30 patients in the OLIF group were treated with OLIF plus posterior intermuscular screw rod internal fixation. There were 13 males and 17 females, aged from 52 to 74 years old with an average of (62.6±8.3) years old. And 30 patients in the TLIF group were treated with TLIF via the left approach. There were 14 males and 16 females, aged from 50 to 81 years old with an average of (61.7±10.4) years old. General data including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and complications were recorded for both groups. Radiologic data including disc height (DH), the left psoas major muscle, multifidus muscle, longissimus muscle area, T2-weighted image hyperintensity changes and interbody fusion or nonfusion were observed. Laboratory parameters including creatine kinase (CK) values on postoperative 1st and 5th days were analyzed. Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry disability index(ODI) were used to assess clinical efficacy. RESULTS:There was no significant difference in the operative time between two groups(P>0.05). The OLIF group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume compared to the TLIF group(P<0.01). The OLIF group also had DH better recovery compared to the TLIF group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in left psoas major muscle area and the hyperintensity degree before and after the operation in the OLIF group (P>0.05). Postoperativly, the area of the left multifidus muscle and longissimus muscle, as well as the mean of the left multifidus muscle and longissimus muscle in the OLIF group, were lower than those in the TLIF group (P<0.05) .On the 1st day and the 5th day after operation, CK level in the OLIF group was lower than that in the TLIF group(P<0.05). On the 3rd day after operation, the VAS of low back pain and leg pain in the OLIF group were lower than those in the TLIF group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the ODI of postoperative 12 months, low back and leg pain VAS at 3, 6, 12 months between the two groups(P>0.05). In the OLIF group, 1 case of left lower extremity skin temperature increased after the operation, and the sympathetic chain was considered to be injured during the operation, and 2 cases of left thigh anterior numbness occurred, which was considered to be related to psoas major muscle stretch, resulting in a complication rate of 10% (3/30). In the TLIF group, one patient had limited ankle dorsiflexion, which was related to nerve root traction, two patients had cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and the dural sac was torn during the operation, and one patient had incision fat liquefaction, which was related to paraspinal muscle dissection injury, resulting in a complication rate of 13% (4/30). All patients achieved interbody fusion without cage collapse during the 6- month follow-up. CONCLUSION:Both OLIF and TLIF are effective in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. However, OLIF surgery has obviously advantages, including less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, and good recovery of intervertebral space height. From the changes in laboratory indexes of CK and the comparison of the left psoas major muscle, multifidus muscle, longissimus muscle area, and high signal intensity of T2 image on imaging, it can be seen that the degree of muscle damage and interference of OLIF surgery is lower than that of TLIF.

A comparative study of oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined posterior percutaneous internal fixation and the anterior-posterior combined surgery in the treatment of single-segment lumbar tuberculosis

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Plate VS. Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Efficacy evaluation of a minimally invasive surgical procedure (oblique lateral interbody fusion) for lumbar spinal tuberculosis—retrospective cohort study

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Lateral Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: a Preliminary Clinical Study

Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Tuberculosis: A 3-Year Retrospective Comparative Study

Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion Versus Traditional Anterior Approach for Localized Lumbar Tuberculosis: a Matched-Pair Case Control Study

Comparison of Clinical Effect and Muscle Injury Imaging Between Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Trans-Foraminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Combination of anterior debridement via small incision and posterior mini-invasive internal fixation for the treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis

Posterior-only vs. combined posterior-anterior approaches in treating lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective study with minimum 7-year follow-up

Comparison of the Effects of One-stage Combination of the Anterior and Posterior Approaches with Simple Anterior Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculosis

Posterior Only Approaches Versus Anterior Only Approaches and Combined Posterior and Anterior Approaches for Lumbar Tuberculosis in Adults: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation with single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis

Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes Between the Anterior and Combined Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treating Lumbosacral Tuberculosis

Comparative study of two different surgical procedures for lumbosacral tuberculosis

Two One-Stage Posterior Approaches for Treating Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Treatment of Single-Segment Lumbar Tuberculosis with Minimally Invasive Posterior Internal Fixation Combined with Anterior Small Incision Debridement

Clinical Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches in Treatment of Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis in Tibet

[Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Intervertebral Surgery for Treating Single-Segment Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis].

Posterior Approach with Osteotomized Debridement Versus Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach in Treating Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches in the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a multicenter retrospective case–control study with a minimum 10-year follow-up

One-stage Posterior Debridement, Bone Grafting Fusion, and Mono-Segment Vs. Short-Segment Fixation for Single-Segment Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Outcomes