Locality in Modular Systems

R. Back,H. Mannila

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0012752

1982-07-12

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Lateral Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: a Preliminary Clinical Study

Hai-dong Li,Shi-Tong Xing,Ji-Kang Min,Xiang-Qian Fang,Shun-Wu Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-836768/v1

2021-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Background The oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive indirect decompression technique for the treatment of lumar spine disease. The OLIF has usually combined with supplemental posterior pedicle screw fixation for decreasing the perioperative complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy and complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with lateral plate instrumentation for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.Methods From May 2020 to August 2020, the clinical data of 20 patients who underwent OLIF combined with lateral plate instrumentation were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, blood loss, and the complications were recorded. Also, the radiological parameters, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated before and after surgery.Results The average operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 75.41±11.53 min, 39.57±9.22 ml, and 7.22±1.85 days, respectively. The VAS and ODI had both significantly improved after surgery (7.23±1.26 VS 2.15±0.87; 60.27±7.91 VS 21.80±6.32, P < 0.001). The postoperative disk height (DH) was 13.02±8.83 mm, which is much higher than before (P < 0.001); The postoperative foraminal height (FH) improved significantly (16.18±3.49 VS 21.54±2.12 mm, P < 0.01), and the cross-sectional area (CSA) had improved from 88.95±14.79 mm2 to 126.53±8.83 mm2 (P < 0.001). The radiological fusion rate was 95% at the last follow-up, while cage subsidence was found in one case. No major complications, such as ureteral injury, vascular injury and vertebral body fracture occurred.Conclusions OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation can avoid the lumbar posterior surgery, minimize the operation time, blood loss and the posterior ligament complex disruption. It can realize one-stage intervertebral fusion and instrumentation through a single small incision.
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Study.

Hai-Dong Li,Li Zhong,Ji-Kang Min,Xiang-Qian Fang,Lei-Sheng Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000028784

IF: 1.6

2022-01-01

Medicine

Abstract:Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive decompression technique used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs). It is usually combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation to decrease perioperative complications. Few studies have reported the efficacy of OLIF combined with lateral plate instrumentation (OLIF-LP) for the treatment of LDDs. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of OLIF combined with lateral plate instrumentation for the treatment of LDDs. From May 2020 to September 2020, the clinical data of 52 patients who underwent OLIF-LP were analyzed. The operation time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. The radiological parameters, visual analog scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index were evaluated. The average operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 75.41 +/- 11.53 minutes, 39.57 +/- 9.22 mL, and 7.22 +/- 1.85 days, respectively. The visual analog scale score and Oswestry Disability Index both improved significantly after surgery (7.23 +/- 1.26 vs 2.15 +/- 0.87; 60.27 +/- 7.91 vs 21.80 +/- 6.32, P < .01). The postoperative disk height was 13.02 +/- 8.83 mm, which was much greater than the preoperative value. The postoperative foraminal height improved significantly (16.18 +/- 3.49 vs 21.54 +/- 2.12 mm, P < .01), and the cross-sectional area improved from 88.95 +/- 14.79 to 126.53 +/- 8.83 mm(2) (P < .001). The radiological fusion rate was 88% at the last follow-up. No major complications, such as ureteral injury, vascular injury, or vertebral body fracture, occurred. Use of the OLIF-LP technique can help avoid lumbar posterior surgery and minimize the operative time and blood loss. OLIF-LP can achieve 1-stage intervertebral fusion and instrumentation through a single small incision.
A Modified Surgical Technique of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Li Fangcai,Chen Qixin,Chen Weishan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2018.04.003

2018-01-01

Abstract:Objective To present the modified surgical technique of lateral lumbar interbody fusion and investigate its approach related complications.Methods Fifty-eight patients treated with novel surgical technique of lateral lumbar interbody fusion(LLIF)from June 2016 to January 2017 were studied retrospectively.There were 24 males and 34 females,aged from 45 to 82 years old(averaged at 66.1±12.1).The diagnosis was as following:degenerative spinal scoliosis in 24 cases,degenerative lum-bar spinal stenosis in 16,lumbar spinal spondylolisthesis in 14,spinal infection and spinal trauma in 2 respectively.The modified surgical technique included operation under direct visualization,the"safety"transpsoas approach and the adjustable microretrac-tor.The patient was placed in a lateral decubitus position,and a transverse or oblique skin incision was planned using fluoroscopy to target the center of the desired disc spaces.The 3 abdominal layers were split longitudinally along the muscle fiber.The psoas major was split longitudinally along the muscle fiber according to the"safety"working window.The adjustable microretractor was used as working corridor to carry out interbody fusion. Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to assess the clinical outcome. The surgical time,estimated blood loss and approach related complications(pain/numbness at anterior thigh,weakness of psoas muscle and quadriceps)were recorded.Results All patients were followed up from 6-12months,the mean follow-up time(9.1± 2.3)months.A total of 132 levels were performed with novel surgical technique of LLIF,one level in 19 cases,2 levels in 10,3 lev-els in 23 and 4 levels in 6 cases.The mean surgical time was(57.2±13.3)min for 1 level,(94.5±31.3)min for 2 levels,(129.8± 42.1)min for 3 levels and(208.3±22.7)min for 4 levels.The estimated blood loss during surgery was less than 10ml every level. Preoperative ODI was 61.8%±20.1%,it was 22.5%±18.3%(t=7.572,P=0.000)at the last time follow-up.The incidence rate of ap-proach related complications was 12.1%(7/58),with anterior thigh pain in 6 cases(10.3%),numbness 5 cases(8.6%)and psoas major weakness 3 cases(5.2%).No quadriceps weakness,vascular injury,sympathetic nerve injury,visceral injury and ureteral in-jury was found in these series.The incidence rate of complications increased significantly in patients underwent three or more lev-els interbody fusion(χ2=4.453,P=0.035).Conclusion The modified surgical technique reduces the approach related complica-tions of traditional lateral lumbar interbody fusion through the operation under the direct visualization, the"safety"transpsoas approach and the adjustable microretractor.
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Plate VS. Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Hai-dong Li,Li Zhong,Xiang-Qian Fang,Lei-Sheng Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1027290/v1

2021-01-01

Abstract:Background The oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive indirect decompression technique for the treatment of degenerative spinal disease. OLIF with posterior pedicle screws fixation frequently is performed, whereas it requires much more surgery time and blood loss. The purpose of this study was to compare the oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with lateral plate (LP) vs. OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw (PS) fixation for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.Methods The clinical data of 53 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent OLIF from January 2020 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed，24 in OLIF combined with lateral plate (OLIF+LP) group and 29 in OLIF combined with pedicle screw (OLIF+PS) group. All patients completed a minimum 1-year follow-up. The duration of operation, blood loss, fusion rate and complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH) and cross-sectional area (CSA) were also evaluated.Results The operation time was 75.41±11.53 min in the OLIF+LP group, which shorter than that in OLIF+PS group(127.05±5.62min, P<0.01). Also, the blood loss was significantly less in the OLIF+LP group (39.55±5.32 ml ) than in the OLIF+PS group (89.81±9.62, P<0.01). The VAS and ODI scores both significantly reduced after operation in OLIF+LP group. There was no difference either in VAS or ODI scores by 1 year after surgery between two groups (P>0.01). The DH, FH, and CSA parameters were all improved significantly after operation in both groups, however, there was no significant difference at the any follow-up point between the two groups. The total complication rate was 13.21% (7/53) in this study, and there was no siginificant difference between the two groups. The fusion rate was 91.67% in the OLIF+LP group and 93.10% in the OLIF+PS group (P =0.69).Conclusions OLIF+LP fixation seems to be a valuable surgical option for single-segmental lumbar degenerative disease, it can achieve much better clinical outcomes than OLIF+PS group.
Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Intervertebral Pyogenic Infection

徐文斌,胡灏,赵兴,胡志军,马建军,范顺武,方向前

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20200320-00178

2020-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To investigate the safety, key techniques and clinical efficacy of OLIF (oblique lumbar interbody fusion) corridor combined with lumbar intervertebral debridement, fusion with two interbody and internal fixation for the treatment of single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.Methods:From February 2016 to March 2017, data of 12 patients with single-level lumbar intervertebral pyogenic infection diagnosed in our hospital who had undergone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with two interbody and posterior pedicle screw fixation via Wiltse approach were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 10 males and 2 females, aged from 49 to 79 years, with an average age of 65.4±9.5 years. The white blood cells (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were recorded and analyzed before operation and at the last follow-up. Lumbar pain was assessed by visual analogue acale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and clinical efficacy was assessed by the MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) and Kirkaldy-Willis criteria. The hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, pathological reports, etiological results and complications were recorded. Disc height (DH), segmental angle (SA) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL) were measured before operation and at the last follow-up. The fusion time was recorded. Paired t-test and ANOVA was used for data analysis. Results:All patients underwent surgery successfully, including 6 cases using two titanium meshes and 6 cases using two autologous tricortical iliac bones. Pathogenic culture was positive in 10 cases, with a positive rate of 83.3%, including 4 cases of streptococcus, 4 cases of Staphylococcus aureus, 1 case of Escherichia coli, and 1 case of Klebsiella pneumoniae. All patients were followed up for 16.1±5.1 months. At the last follow-up, WBC ([6.25±2.02] ×10 9/L) was lower than that before operation ([4.89±1.28] ×10 9/L), CRP (preoperation 58.73±52.56 mg/L vs postoperation 8.48±8.79 mg/L) and ESR (preoperation 51.88±19.04 mm/1 h vs postoperation 9.25±5.50 mm/1 h) were significantly lower ( P< 0.01). The VAS score was preoperation 6.67±1.63 and postoperation 1.50±0.55, ODI score was preoperation 72.57%±3.41% and postoperation 18.00%±2.31%, and both were significantly lower postoperatively ( P < 0.01). SF-36 score (preoperation 56.33±4.93 vs postoperation 73.73±5.86) was significantly higher ( P< 0.01) respectively. The postoperative height of intervertebral space ([11.68±2.64] mm) was significantly higher than that before operation ([5.18±1.58] mm). The disc height at the last follow-up was (11.22±2.25) mm, and the loss rate was 1.89% compared with that of the immediate postoperatively; The postoperative lumbar lordosis angle (32.89°±14.52°) was significantly increased compared with that of the preoperative (24.16°±13.49°), and maintained well at the last follow-up (32.27°± 14.21°); The postoperative segmental angle (10.8°±8.51°) was significantly increased compared with that of the preoperative (5.81°±7.44°), and maintained well at the last follow-up (9.94°±7.87°). The fusion time ranged from 6 to 16 months, with an average of 9.2±3.5 months. The clinical efficacy was excellent in 10 cases (83.3%) and good in 2 cases (16.7%). The excellent and good rate was 100%. One case of pulmonary infection and pulmonary embolism occurred 2 days after operation, and recovered after use of antibiotics and anticoagulation treatment in ICU; one case of intramuscular venous thrombosis was found 1 day after operation, and recovered after anticoagulation treatment; no loosening of internal fixation was found, and no complications related to OLIF corridor occurred. Conclusion:The treatment of single-level lumbar intervertebral pyogenic infection with OLIF corridor combined with lumbar intervertebral debridement, fusion with two interbody and internal fixation has the advantages of less blood loss, shorter operation time, more direct clearance of intervertebral space and left paravertebral focus, no disturbance of intraspinal canal and posterior structure, higher positive rate of etiology detection, shorter bedrest time and better restore of disc height and lumbar lordosis after operation. What’s more, the fusion rate is high and the clinical efficacy is satisfactory.
Early Complications Associated with Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

Wang Jiying,Zhou Zhijie,Fan Shunwu,Fang Xiangqian,Zhao Fengdong,Zhang Jianfeng,Zhao Xing,Hu Zhijun,Liu Junhui,Wang Yanyan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.16.007

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the early clinical outcomes and complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods All of 83 patients,29 males and 54 females with ages from 32 to 83 (average 60.8± 13.7 y),underwent OLIF with or without posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentations from October 2014 to February 2017.The index diagnosis was discogenic back pain in 17 cases,spondylolisthesis in 23,lumbar spinal canal stenosis in 25,and degenerative lumbar spinal kyphoscoliosis in 18 cases.The distribution of operative level was 5 at L1,2,13 at L2,3,38 at L3,4,and 69 at L4,5.The mean number of fusion level for each case was 1.5 segments.The operative duration,blood loss during operation,intra-operative and post-operative complications,the length of post-operative hospital stay were recorded.Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI).All patients were followed up for at least 3 months.Lumbar X-ray and CT scans were taken and the clinical outcomes were re-assessed during follow-up.Results Fifty-one in the 83 patients underwent supplementary posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentation with OLIF procedures.The operation lasted for 43-295 min,with a mean duration of (153 ± 72) min.Mean operation time for each OLIF segment was 43± 12 min.Blood loss during the operation was 30-800 ml,with a mean of 125±74 ml.Mean blood loss for each OLIF segment was 27±13 min.Average length of stay was 5.6 ± 3.2 d,ranging from 3-15 d.The VAS for back pain and leg pain and ODI scores were decreased apparently for each patient.The total incidence of complications was 22.9％ (19/83),including 6.0％ (5/83) of intra-operative complications (4 cases of cage subsidence,1 case of segmental artery injury) and 16.9％ (14/83) of post-operative ones.The latter consisted of ipsilateral hip flexor weakness in 6,ipsilateral anterolateral thigh pain in 2,ipsilateral lateral thigh numbness in 1,contralateral pain in flexion of hip in 1,ipsilateral sympathetic chain injury in 2,and pain in area of iliac bone donor site in 2.All symptoms were released or disappeared during follow-up.Conclusion OLIF as a novel minimally invasive technique can act as a safe and effective treatment for degenerative lumbar diseases,which can also reduce approach-related complications.
The Effect of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program on Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease at Short-Term Follow-Up.

Wenxiang Chen,Huiying Yang,Xuesheng Jiang,Shunwu Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5806066

2021-01-01

BioMed Research International

Abstract:PURPOSE:Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach has been increasingly frequently performed in recent years. However, neither studies of OLIF approach nor the researches of the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in spinal surgery are relatively rare. Here, our study is aimed at investigating the therapeutic effects of the application of OLIF compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approach combined with ERAS in dealing with this disorder at short-term follow-up. Material and Methods. Thirty-eight patients who undergone OLIF and forty patients who undergone TLIF with pedicle screws were included in our study. The concept of ERAS was applied in the perioperative period of the patients. Preoperative and postoperative laboratory test indexes of blood were examined and evaluated in all individuals. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Clinical Symptom Score of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) were used in preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up. Satisfaction survey was also performed after surgery.RESULT:The postoperative results of red blood count, C-reaction protein, D-dimer, and albumin were still within the reference ranges in most of the patients. It was shown that objective evaluations including VAS score, ODI index, and JOA score were significantly improved after OLIF and TLIF surgery. The follow-up of 6 months after surgery showed that VAS, ODI, and JOA were improved more in the OLIF group than that in the TLIF group. The overall satisfaction (satisfied and very satisfied) was 95% and 97.4% in the TLIF group and the OLIF group, respectively, and there was no difference between the two groups.CONCLUSION:This study indicated that OLIF and TLIF approach were both rather effective therapies for patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. The effect of OLIF procedure could be better than TLIF procedure in the early stage after surgery.
One‐stage Debridement Via Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Corridor Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Spontaneous Lumbar Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Case Series

Yong-jun Tong,Jun-hui Liu,Shun-wu Fan,Feng-dong Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12562

2019-01-01

Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:ObjectiveSurgery is indicated when antibiotic treatment fails in pyogenic spondylodiscitis, which is caused by pathogens such as the Staphylococcus species. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) corridor approach combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation for treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis.MethodsThis was a retrospective case series study. A total of 11 patients with an average age of 60.7 years (range, 40–70 years; 10 males and 1 females) with lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis who underwent single‐stage debridement and reconstruction using the OLIF corridor combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation were recruited in our study from June 2016 to July 2017. All patients had single‐level pyogenic spondylodiscitis between T12 and L5. The baseline data, perioperative outcomes (operative time, intra‐operative blood loss, and intra‐operative complication), postoperative laboratory tests (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], C‐reactive protein [CRP], white blood count [WBC], and tissue culture results), long‐term complications (recurrence, fixation failure, and bony non‐fusion rates), and duration of antibiotic administration were reviewed. Outcomes evaluated using a variety of scales including visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI), were compared pre‐operatively and post‐operatively.ResultsThe mean follow‐up period of time was 18.3 months. The average operative time and intra‐operative blood loss were 217.0 ± 91.91 min and 220.9 ± 166.10 mL, respectively. There were no intra‐operative complications, except in 1 patient who encountered somatosensory evoked potentials changes and 1 patient who had motor evoked potentials changes, both without post‐surgery neurological deficits. Causative organisms were identified in 4 patients: Staphylococcus aureus in 1 patient and Streptococcus in 3 patients. At approximately 8.8 weeks after surgery, WBC, CRP, and ESR had returned to normal levels. All patients were pain free with no recurring infection. There was no fixation failure during follow up. Solid bony fusions were observed in all cases within 6 months. At the final follow up, the mean VAS (0.6 ± 0.69) and ODI (14.4 ± 4.27) were significantly lower than those before surgery (P < 0.05).ConclusionOne‐stage debridement with autogenous iliac bone graft through the OLIF corridor combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation is effective and safe for single‐level spontaneous lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis after antibiotic treatment fails.
Oblique lateral interbody fusion treats adjacent segment diseases after lumbar spinal fusion

曾忠友,赵兴,王建,陈平泉,俞伟,吴宏飞,宋永兴,范顺武,方向前,裴斐,范时洋,宋国浩

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20220510-00266

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To explore the feasibility and clinical efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of adjacent segment disease (ASDis).Methods:Retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 31 patients with ASDis treated by OLIF in four medical centers from June 2015 to December 2018. There were 17 males and 14 females. The average age was (65.7±3.4) years (range, 59 to 75 years). 19 cases received single-segment fixed fusion, 11 cases received double-segment fixed fusion and 1 case received three-segment fixed fusion. Original fixed fusion site: 1 case of L 1, 2, 3 cases of L 3, 4, 11 cases of L 4, 5, 4 cases of L 5S 1, 6 cases of L 3-L 5, 5 cases of L 4-S 1, and 1 case of L 3-S 1. The time from the initial fixation and fusion to this admission was 82.5±45.5 months (rang, 24 to 180 months). ASDis occurred at the proximal end of the fixed fusion segment in 28 cases and at the distal end in 3 cases. The types of ASDis: degenerative disc disease in 11 cases, lumbar spinal stenosis in 15 cases, degenerative spondylolisthesis in 2 cases, and degenerative scoliosis in 3 cases. The location of ASDis: 6 cases of L 2, 3, 12 cases of L 3, 4, 6 cases of L 4, 5, 3 cases of L 1-L 3, 1 case of L 2-L 4, and 3 cases of L 1-L 4. At admission, 3 cases of lumbar internal fixation had been removed and 28 cases of internal fixation remained. Stand-alone OLIF was performed in 19 cases, OLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation in 8 cases, and OLIF combined with cortical screw fixation in 4 cases. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the low back pain and lumbar function before operation and at the last follow-up, and the imaging results and complications were observed. Results:All patients were followed up. The follow-up time was 23.6±9.6 months (range, 12 to 60 months). The operation time was 73.8±25.3 mins (range, 40 to 180 min), and the intraoperative blood loss was 86.2±67.4 ml (range, 20 to 310 ml). The average blood loss in each segment was 24.8 ml. During the operation, there were 1 case of segmental vein injury, 7 cases of endplate injury, 2 cases of transient iliopsoas muscle weakness, 1 case of thigh pain and numbness, and 1 case of incomplete intestinal obstruction. There was no incision necrosis and infection. The VAS score of low back pain decreased from 5.9±1.9 before operation to 1.4±0.6 at the last follow-up, with a statistically significant difference ( t=8.47, P<0.001). The ODI index recovered from 45.2%±5.7% before operation to 13.8%±4.7% at the last follow-up, with a statistically significant difference ( t=7.92, P<0.001). The height of intervertebral space increased from 8.7±1.6 mm before operation to 11.4±1.9 mm after operation and 9.9±1.8 mm at the last follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference between postoperative and preoperative height of intervertebral space ( F=4.15, P=0.007). There was a statistically significant difference between the last follow-up and postoperative height of intervertebral space ( P=0.011). During the follow-up, there were 13 cases of fusion cage subsidence, 1 case of fusion cage displacement, and no case of internal fixation loosening or fracture. The intervertebral fusion rate was 94%(29/31) and the complication rate was 42%(13/31). Conclusion:ASDis is a common complication after lumbar fixation and fusion, and requires surgical treatment. OLIF is a reliable method to treat ASDis as it has advantages of small trauma, high fusion rate and low complication rate.
Comparison of Clinical Effect and Muscle Injury Imaging Between Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Trans-Foraminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

San-Biao Li,Sheng-Qian Mei,Wen-Bin Xu,Xiang-Qian Fang,Shun-Wu Fan,Li-Bin Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.005

2023-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS:The clinical data of 60 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent surgical treatment from January 2018 to October 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into OLIF groups and TLIF group according to different surgical methods. The 30 patients in the OLIF group were treated with OLIF plus posterior intermuscular screw rod internal fixation. There were 13 males and 17 females, aged from 52 to 74 years old with an average of (62.6±8.3) years old. And 30 patients in the TLIF group were treated with TLIF via the left approach. There were 14 males and 16 females, aged from 50 to 81 years old with an average of (61.7±10.4) years old. General data including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and complications were recorded for both groups. Radiologic data including disc height (DH), the left psoas major muscle, multifidus muscle, longissimus muscle area, T2-weighted image hyperintensity changes and interbody fusion or nonfusion were observed. Laboratory parameters including creatine kinase (CK) values on postoperative 1st and 5th days were analyzed. Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry disability index(ODI) were used to assess clinical efficacy. RESULTS:There was no significant difference in the operative time between two groups(P>0.05). The OLIF group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume compared to the TLIF group(P<0.01). The OLIF group also had DH better recovery compared to the TLIF group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in left psoas major muscle area and the hyperintensity degree before and after the operation in the OLIF group (P>0.05). Postoperativly, the area of the left multifidus muscle and longissimus muscle, as well as the mean of the left multifidus muscle and longissimus muscle in the OLIF group, were lower than those in the TLIF group (P<0.05) .On the 1st day and the 5th day after operation, CK level in the OLIF group was lower than that in the TLIF group(P<0.05). On the 3rd day after operation, the VAS of low back pain and leg pain in the OLIF group were lower than those in the TLIF group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the ODI of postoperative 12 months, low back and leg pain VAS at 3, 6, 12 months between the two groups(P>0.05). In the OLIF group, 1 case of left lower extremity skin temperature increased after the operation, and the sympathetic chain was considered to be injured during the operation, and 2 cases of left thigh anterior numbness occurred, which was considered to be related to psoas major muscle stretch, resulting in a complication rate of 10% (3/30). In the TLIF group, one patient had limited ankle dorsiflexion, which was related to nerve root traction, two patients had cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and the dural sac was torn during the operation, and one patient had incision fat liquefaction, which was related to paraspinal muscle dissection injury, resulting in a complication rate of 13% (4/30). All patients achieved interbody fusion without cage collapse during the 6- month follow-up. CONCLUSION:Both OLIF and TLIF are effective in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. However, OLIF surgery has obviously advantages, including less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, and good recovery of intervertebral space height. From the changes in laboratory indexes of CK and the comparison of the left psoas major muscle, multifidus muscle, longissimus muscle area, and high signal intensity of T2 image on imaging, it can be seen that the degree of muscle damage and interference of OLIF surgery is lower than that of TLIF.
Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique.

Zhong-You Zeng,Zhao-Wan Xu,Deng-Wei He,Xing Zhao,Wei-Hu Ma,Wen-Fei Ni,Yong-Xing Song,Jian-Qiao Zhang,Wei Yu,Xiang-Qian Fang,Zhi-Jie Zhou,Nan-Jian Xu,Wen-Jian Huang,Zhi-Chao Hu,Ai-Lian Wu,Jian-Fei Ji,Jian-Fu Han,Shun-Wu Fan,Feng-Dong Zhao,Hui Jin,Fei Pei,Shi-Yang Fan,De-Xiu Sui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12380

2018-01-01

Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:Objective: To analyze the early complications and causes of oblique lateral interbody fusion, and put forward preventive measures. Methods: There were 235 patients (79 males and 156 females) analyzed in our study from October 2014 to May 2017. The average age was 61.9 +/- 0.21 years (from 32 to 83 years). Ninety-one cases were treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) alone (OLIF alone group) and 144 with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation through the intermuscular space approach (OLIF combined group). In addition, 137/144 cases in the combined group were primarily treated by posterior pedicle screw fixation, while the treatments were postponed in 7 cases. There were 190 cases of single fusion segments, 11 of 2 segments, 21 of 3 segments, and 13 of 4 segments. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed. Results: Average follow-up time was 15.6 +/- 7.5 months (ranged from 6 to 36 months). Five cases were lost to follow-up (2 cases from the OLIF alone group and 3 cases from the OLIF combined group). There were 7 cases of vascular injury, 22 cases of endplate damage, 2 cases of vertebral body fracture, 11 cases of nerve injury, 18 cases of cage sedimentation or cage transverse shifting, 3 cases of iliac crest pain, 1 case of right psoas major hematoma, 2 cases of incomplete ileus, 1 case of acute heart failure, 1 case of cerebral infarction, 3 case of left lower abdominal pain, 9 cases of transient psoas weakness, 3 cases of transient quadriceps weakness, and 8 cases of reoperation. The complication incidence was 32.34%. Thirty-three cases occurred in the OLIF alone group, with a rate of 36.26%, and 43 cases in the group of OLIF combined posterior pedicle screw fixation, with a rate of 29.86%. Fifty-seven cases occurred in single-segment fusion, with a rate of 30.0% (57/190), 4 cases occurred in two-segment fusion, with a rate of 36.36% (4/11), 9 cases occurred in three-segment fusion, with a rate of 42.86% (9/21), and 6 cases occurred in four-segment fusion, with a rate of 46.15% (6/13). Conclusion: In summary, OLIF is a relatively safe and very effective technique for minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Nonetheless, it should be noted that OLIF carries the risk of complications, especially in the early stage of development.
A comparative study on the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis by oblique interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforminal lumbar interbody fusion

裘天强,裘人华,庞正宝,庞帮镭,崔德永,叶甫国,胡志军,徐文斌,方向前,范顺武

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20200316-00166

2020-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To compare the efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Methods:Data of 40 patients with I-II degree single level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis from January 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the operation procedure, they were divided into two groups: OLIF group and MI-TLIF group, and each group had 20 patients. There were 15 males and 5 females in the OLIF group, aged 50.3±8.8 years; and there were 13 males and 7 females in the MI-TLIF group, aged 51.7±8.7 years. According to the Meyerding's grade system, there were 16 patients of type I in the OLIF group and 15 cases in the MI-TLIF group; and there were 4 patients of type II in the OLIF group and 5 cases in the MI-TLIF group. The operation time, intra-operative hemorrhage, postoperative drainage, recessive blood loss and albumin loss were recorded. The CRP and ESR on the third day after operation, the VAS score and ODI score before and after operation were recorded. The lumbar lordosis (LL), fused segmental lordosis (FSL) and disc height (DH) before and after operation were recorded. The time of getting out of bed and walking and the hospital stay were recorded. Paired t-test was used to analyze the data.Results:Forty patients successfully underwent the operation. The operation time of OLIF group was 96±20 min, with intraoperative blood loss of 61±32 ml and postoperative drainage volume of 18±8 ml. The operation time of MI-TLIF group was 132±26 min, with intraoperative blood loss of 262±102 ml and postoperative drainage volume of 95±42 ml; and there was statistical difference between the two groups ( t=4.901, 8.404, 8.064; P< 0.001). On the third day after operation, the occult blood loss was 139±47 ml in the OLIF group and 486±192 ml in the MI-TLIF group; the albumin loss was 4.2±1.9 g/L in the OLIF group and 10.2±3.9 g/L in the MI-TLIF group; CRP was 34±11 mg/L in the OLIF group and 106±39 mg/L in the MI-TLIF group; ESR was 41±15 mm/1 h in the OLIF group and 71±24 mm/1 h in the MI-TLIF group, and there all were statistical differences between the two groups ( t=7.838, 6.184, 7.983, 4.675; P< 0.001). The VAS scores were 2.2±1.5, 1.8±1.3 and ODI scores were 14%±11%, 59%±17%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. The LL were 33.41°±9.25°, 32.07°±9.54°, FSL were 11.59°±5.09°, 10.61°±4.56° and DH were 10.35±2.30 mm, 10.85±1.85 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. The follow-up time was 13.5±2.3 months in the OLIF group and 14.1±2.8 months in the MI-TLIF group. Three patients in the MI-TLIF group had radiation pain in the lower extremity on the third day after operation, which relieved after NSAID drugs and mannitol treatment. In the group of OLIF, the skin temperature of the left lower extremity increased in 1 case on the first day after operation, in which sympathetic chain injury was considered, and the patient recovered after 2.5 months; in the group of OLIF, the numbness in the front of the left thigh and the weakness of flexion of the hip was found in 3 cases, in which the edema or injury of the psoas major muscle was considered. Conclusion:Compared with MI-TLIF in the treatment of I, II degree single segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, OLIF has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, lower inflammation index, earlier time to get out of bed and shorter hospital stay. However, the outcomes of the two surgeries were similar.
The Indirect Decompression Effect of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis

Ding Lingzhi,Fan Shunwu,Hu Zhijun,Fang Xiangqian,Zhao Fengdong,Zhang Jianfeng,Zhao Xing,Zhou Zhijie,Liu Junhui,Wang Yanyan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.16.002

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the indirect decompression effect of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of mild to moderate degenerative lumbar stenosis.Methods From October 2014 to November 2016,23 patients with mild to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis underwent OLIF combined with or without posterior pedicle screw fixation;9 males and 14 females with average age of 59.2±11.6 years old;8 cases at L3,4 segment and 15 cases at L4,5 segment.All cases were followed up for more than 6 months.Thin layer scanning of CT and two-dimensional reconstruction images were used to measure the vertical diameter and area of intervertebral foramen.Intervertebral disc height and spinal canal anteroposterior diameter were measured on median sagittal MRI sequence,and the anteroposterior diameter and the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal were measured on cross-sectional MRI sequence.The clinical effects were assessed by the visual analogue score (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) for low back pain,lower limb pain and lower limb numbness.Results Compared with those measurements pre-operatively,the post-operative intervertebral disc height increased by 78.6％±13.4％.The post-operative left vertical diameter of intervertebral foramen increased by 36.7％±7.8％,and the post-operative left area of intervertebral foramen increased by 36.6％± 8.7％,and the post-operative right vertical diameter of intervertebral foramen increased by 40.7％±9.6％,and the post-operative right area of intervertebral foramen increased by 40.0％±8.9％.The post-operative anteroposterior diameter of sagittal spinal canal were increased 32.6％ ± 5.9％,and the post-operative anteroposterior diameter of cross-sectional spinal canal were increased 34.4％±6.8％,and the post-operative cross-sectional area of the spinal canal were increased 47.5％±7.2％.All of the differences were statistically significant between pre-operative and post-operative measurements.The VAS score for low back pain was 6.2± 1.7 pre-operatively,and 1.1±0.5 post-operatively.The ODI for low back pain was 81.2％± 18.2％ pre-operatively,and 6.1％±2.0％ post-operatively.The VAS score for lower limb pain was 5.6±1.4 pre-operatively,and 0.8±0.3 post-operatively.And the VAS score for lower limb numbness was 6.6±2.0 pre-operatively,and 3.4± 1.2 post-operatively.All of the differences were statistically significant between pre-operative and post-operative evaluations.Conclusion There were obvious radiological evidences and remarkable clinical effect of indirect decompression using OLIF technique in treatment of mild to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis at early post-operative stage.However further long-term follow-up studies with multicenter large sample were still needed.
Clinical Value of One-Level Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases

张建锋,范顺武,方向前,赵凤东,周志杰,赵兴,胡志军,刘军辉,王燕燕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.02.003

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of one-level oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods A total of 36 patients,11 males and 25 females with ages from 32 to 75 (average 55.2 ± 13.6 years),underwent one-level OLIF with or without posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentations from October 2014 to May 2016.The index diagnosis was discogenic back pain in 15 cases,and spondylolisthesis with or without segmental instability in 21 cases.The distribution of operative level was 30 cases at L4/5 and 6 cases at L3/4.The changes of serum level of creatinine kinase was measured 1 and 3 days post-operatively,and compared to that of the pre-operative one.Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODI) scores.Lumbar X-ray was taken and the clinical outcomes were re-assessed.Results 25 in the 36 patients underwent supplementary posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentation with OLIF procedures.The operation lasted for 46-175 min,with a mean duration of (112±43) min.Blood loss during the operation was 30-180 ml,with a mean of (63 ± 35) ml.Average length of stay was (4.5±2.1) d,ranging from 3-7 d.Serum level of creatinine kinase was (63.5±16.8) IU/L before operation,(416.8±152.1) IU/L 1 day after operation,(112.4±37.5) IU/L 3 days after operation.The VAS and ODI score decreased from (8.3±2.3) pre-operatively to (1.6±0.4) 6 months post-operatively,and from (69.2±17.5) to (10.7±2.7),respectively.The total incidence of complications was 25％,including 8.3％ of intra-operative complications (3 cases of cage subsidence) and 16.7 ％ of post-operative ones.The latter consisted of ipsilateral hip flexor weakness in 1,ipsilateral anterior thigh pain in 1,contralateral pain in flexion of hip in 1,ipsilateral sympathetic chain injury in 1,and pain in area of iliac bone donor site in 2.All symptoms were released or disappeared during follow-up.Conclusion OLIF as a novel technique for spinal surgical management showed excellent short-term outcomes.Clinical results with long-term follow-up are required.
[Analysis of early and middle stage efficacy and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating degenerative lumbar diseases]

Yong-Sheng Zhao,Qiang Li,Yang Wang,Cheng-Shao Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.02.010

2022-02-25

Abstract:Objective: To investigate the early and middle stage efficacy and complications of minimally invasive extraperitoneal oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Methods: The clinical data of 22 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases underwent OLIF from October 2017 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 14 males and 8 females, aged from 51 to 72 years with an average of (63.15±7.22) years. There were 6 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, 5 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, 4 cases of adjacent vertebral disease, 3 cases of degenerative lumbar scoliosis, 3 cases of discogenic low back pain, and 1 case of recurrence after posterior lumbar decompression. Posterior minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation was performed in 13 cases and Stand-alone fixation in 9 cases. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative drainage volume, landing time were recorded. The intervertebral disc height(IDH), intervertebral foramen height(IFH), intervertebral foramen area( IFA), canal diameter(CD), canal area(CA) were measured before and after operation. The imaging changes (including location of fusion cage, interbody fusion, and cage subsidence) and complications were observed. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numerical rating scales (NRS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were compared before and 3, 6, 12 months after operation. Results: All 22 patients successfully completed the operation. The intraoperative blood loss was 25 to 280 ml with an average of (95.45±79.07) ml and that of simple anterior approach was 25 to 70 ml with an average of (45.71±15.42) ml. The operation time was 75 to 210 min with an average of (137.72±37.66) min, and the simple anterior operation time was 75 to 105 min with an average of (91.40±15.96) min. The total drainage volume was 10 to 110 ml with an average of (56.23±31.15) ml, and the time to go down to the ground was 24 to 72 hours (54.48±18.24) hours after operation. Postoperative IDH improved (6.63±2.61)mm(P<0.05), the IFH improved (5.35±2.47)mm (P<0.05), the IFA improved (97.67±33.58)mm2(P<0.05), the CD improved (3.31±1.61) mm(P<0.05), the CA improved (57.52±31.39) mm2(P<0.05). Five patients got interbody fusion at 6 months after operation and all 22 patients got interbody fusion at 12 months after operation. There was 5 cases of fusion cage subsidence, all of which occurred in the cases without posterior fixation(using Stand-alone fixation). There was no serious complication such as big blood vessel injury, ureter injury, dural sac injury and nerve root injury. Peritoneal injury occurred in 1 case, postoperative transient thigh pain, decrease of quadriceps femoris muscle strength in 4 cases and sympathetic nerve injury in 1 case. The symptoms of lumbago and radicular pain of lower extremities were alleviated obviously 3 days after operation. The ODI, NRS and JOA scores at 6, 12 months after operation were significantly improved(P<0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases with definite indications by OLIF can achieve satisfactory clinical results, and it has advantages of less intraoperative bleeding, fast time to land, less complications, good imaging improvement and indirect decompression. But the operation time and fluoroscopy time are longer in the early stage, and complications such as peritoneal injury and lumbar plexus over traction may occur. The long-term incidence of settlement of fusion cage with Stand-alone technology is higher.
[Effects of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lordosis Correction in Degenerative Lumbar Diseases].

Y L Chen,Z H Zhu,Y K Wang,S W Fan,X Q Fang,S L Wan,J F Zhang,X Zhao,F D Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.25.005

2018-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To compare the operation time, estimated blood loss, clinical outcome and correction of lumbar lordosis between oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases. Methods: Seventy-three patients who underwent OLIF or TLIF surgery from January 2016 to December 2017 in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Zhejiang University were analyzed in this retrospective case-control study. The patients included 31 males and 42 females, with a mean age of 65.8 years (range, 36-88 years). Of the patients, there were 9 cases of calcified disc herniation, 34 cases of spinal stenosis, 17 cases of degenerative spondylolithesis, 12 cases of degenerative scoliosis and 1 case of isthmic spondylolithesis. According to the type of surgery, patients were divided into OLIF group (34 cases) and TLIF group (39 cases). The operation time, estimated blood loss and transfusion were recorded, pre-and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated, and pre- and post-operative lumbar lordosis (LL) and fused segment lordosis (FSL) were measured. Student t test were used in comparison between groups. Results: Ten (29.4%) patients in OLIF group and all 39 (100%) patients in TLIF group were supplemented with posterior instrumentation (χ(2)=41.013, P<0.05). The average operation time and estimated blood loss was significantly lower in OLIF group than in those in TLIF group[(163±68) vs (233±79) min, (116±148) vs (434±201) ml, t=4.019, 6.964, both P<0.05]. There was no significant differences in decreases value in VAS and ODI after surgery between the two groups (t=1.716, 0.522, both P>0.05). The correction of LL was 4.0°±10.0° in the OLIF group and 4.2°±6.1° in the TLIF group; the correction of FSL was 4.1°±7.0° in the OLIF group and 5.2°±4.6° in the TLIF group, with no significant differences between the two groups too (t=0.139, 0.805, both P>0.05). The correction of LL was significantly higher in OLIF group with posterior instrumentation than that in TLIF group (9.9°±11.1° vs 4.2°±6.1°, t=2.180, P<0.05). Conclusions: Both OLIF and TLIF can restore LL to some extent, but OLIF has obvious advantages in the operation time and blood loss during surgery. When supplemented with posterior instrumentation, OLIF can achieve better correction of LL than TLIF.
Clinical value and effectiveness profiles of oblique lateral interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar brucellosis spondylitis

Y-L Jia,X-H Zuo,Y Zhang,Y Yao,Y-L Yin,X-M Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202305_32291

Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for lumbar brucellosis spondylitis. Patients and methods: Between April 2018 and December 2021, 80 cases of lumbar brucellosis spondylitis admitted to our institution were evaluated for eligibility and randomly assigned to either PLIF (group A, lesion removal by posterior approach + interbody fusion + percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation) or OLIF (group B, lesion removal by anterior approach + interbody fusion + percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation). The outcome measures included operative time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification, Cobb angle, and interbody fusion time. Results: PLIF resulted in shorter operative time and hospital stay and less intraoperative bleeding vs. OLIF (p<0.05). All eligible patients showed significantly lower VAS scores, and smaller ESR values and Cobb angles after treatment (p<0.05), but no significant intergroup differences were observed (p>0.05). The two groups showed similar preoperative ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) classification and interbody fusion time (p>0.05). PLIF was associated with better ASIA classification at three months postoperatively vs. OLIF (p<0.05). Conclusions: Both surgical techniques are efficient at removing the lesion, relieving pain, maintaining spinal stability, promoting implant fusion, and facilitating prognostic inflammation control. PLIF features a shorter surgical duration and hospital stay, less intraoperative bleeding, and greater neurological improvement vs. OLIF. Nevertheless, OLIF outperforms PLIF in the excision of peri-vertebral abscesses. PLIF is indicated for posterior spinal column lesions, particularly those with spinal nerve compression in the spinal canal, whereas OLIF is indicated for structural bone deterioration in the anterior column, particularly for those with perivascular abscesses.
Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease A Prospective Cohort Study

Hai-Feng Zhu,Xiang-Qian Fang,Feng-Dong Zhao,Jian-Feng Zhang,Xing Zhao,Zhi-Jun Hu,Shun-Wu Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004303

IF: 3.241

2022-01-01

Spine

Abstract:Study Design. Prospective cohort study. Objective. To assess the differences in the clinical and radiological outcomes between oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). Summary of Background Data. Nowadays, there is still a controversy regarding whether OLIF is superior to MI-TLIF in the management of degenerative lumbar disease. Methods. Between August 3, 2019 and February 3, 2020, 137 patients were assigned to OLIF or MI-TLIF at their request and the surgeon's discretion: 71 in the OLIF group and 66 in the MI-TLIF group. The perioperative data, patient-reported outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results. The OLIF group showed shorter operation time (110.5 vs.183.8 minutes, P < 0.001), lesser estimated blood loss (123.1 vs. 232.0 mL, P < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (5.5 vs. 6.7 days, P < 0.001), and lower serum creatine kinase (CK) (1 day postoperatively) (376.0 vs. 541.8 IU/L, P < 0.01) than that of MI-TLIF group. Both groups showed no significant differences in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores of lower back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (P > 0.05). Compared with the MI-TLIF group, the OLIF group showed better restoration of disc height (DH) (4.7/4.6/4.7 vs. 3.7/3.7/3.7 mm, P < 0.01) and lumbar lordosis angle (LLA) (10.5 degrees/10.8 degrees/11.1 degrees vs. 5.8 degrees/5.7 degrees/5.3 degrees, P < 0.001), but not the value of segmental lordosis angle (SLA) (P > 0.05) at 1 day, 1 month, and 1 year postoperatively, respectively. The complication rate of OLIF was higher than that of MI-TLIF (29.4% vs. 9.7%, P < 0.01). Conclusion. Compared with MI-TLIF, OLIF showed similar results in terms of patient-reported outcomes, restoration of SLA and fusion rate, and superior results with respect to restoration of DH and LLA, operation time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and serum CK levels (1 day postoperatively). Even though the complication rate of OLIF is higher than that of MI-TLIF, it does not bring persistent and substantial damage to the patients.
Oblique Lateral Endoscopic Decompression and Interbody Fusion for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technical Note and Preliminary Results

Fei Jia,Xinyu Dou,Yu Liu,Xiaoguang Liu,Chuanchao Du

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13502

Abstract:Objective: Adequacy of decompression for oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a real concern in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). With this in mind, we combined OLIF with spinal endoscopic technique to achieve a solid fusion and an adequate decompression after one operation. Methods: This is a technical note. The theoretical basis and operation process of this technique were introduced, and consecutive cases were retrospectively collected. Consecutive patients diagnosed with monosegmental severe LSS (L4/5) and underwent oblique lateral endoscopic decompression and interbody fusion (OLEDIF) from January 2018 to February 2020 were retrospectively collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed by claudication distance, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Secondary indicators included operation time, operative blood loss, and postoperative complications. Results: Ten patients were selected for the OLEDIF procedure. They were five women and five men ranging in age from 49 to 75 years (mean age of 63.9 years) and in BMI from 25.4 to 30.2 kg/m2 (mean BMI of 27.5 kg/m2 ). The preoperative claudication distance was 160.00 ± 68.96 m (range 70-250 m), which was significantly extended on the 3-month and 1-year follow-up (1020.00 ± 407.70 m and 1040.00 ± 416.87 m, respectively). The preoperative VAS score of back pain and radiating leg pain was 5.50 ± 0.97 (range 4-7) and 6.40 ± 0.97 (range 5-8). The score on postoperative month 3 was 1.60 ± 0.52 (range 1-2) and 1.20 ± 0.79 (range 0-2), and the 1-year follow-up score was 1.90 ± 0.74 (range 1-3) and 1.60 ± 0.70 (range 1-3), respectively. The preoperative ODI was 72.23 ± 6.30 (range 64.4-82.2), the 3-month follow-up ODI was 31.12 ± 4.20 (range 24.4-35.6), and the 1-year follow-up ODI was 29.33 ± 5.92 (range 20.0-37.8). Compared with the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the literature, the operation time was not prolonged (189.3 ± 32.5 min vs. 214.9 ± 60.0 min) but the amount of blood loss decreased significantly (113.3 ± 26.7 ml vs. 366.8 ± 298.2 ml). No complications were found except one case presented with dysesthesia of the left leg. Imaging results showed good fusion without cage subsidence during 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: OLEDIF can achieve complete ventral decompression of the spinal canal and solid fusion of the lumbar spine at one time. It is an effective minimally invasive technique for the treatment of monosegmental severe LSS, which is promising and worthy of further clinical practice.
Comparing the medium-term outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion via transforaminal and oblique approach in treating lumbar degenerative disc diseases

Long Zhao,Tianhang Xie,Xiandi Wang,Zhiqiang Yang,Xingxiao Pu,Yufei Lu,Yueming Song,Jiancheng Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.12.006

Abstract:Background context: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has been proven to be effective in treating lumbar degenerative disorders (LDDs) via indirect decompression. However, its superiority over transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) remains questionable, especially in terms of medium-term follow-up. Purpose: To compare the medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of TLIF and OLIF in treating patients with LDDs. Study design: Retrospective comparative study. Patient sample: Fifty-two patients treated by TLIF and forty-six patients treated by OLIF. Outcome measures: Clinical records including the visual analog scale (VAS) score of the lower back and leg and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological records including disk height (DH), lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the spinal canal, and fusion rate. Surgical-related information and complications were also recorded. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who were surgically managed for LDDs at L4-5 between 2015 and 2017 and completed at least 4 years of follow-up. A total of 98 patients were analyzed, with 46 patients treated by OLIF combined with anterolateral single screw-rod fixation (OLIF-AF group), and 52 patients treated by TLIF (TLIF group). Parameters including postoperative outcomes and perioperative complications were compared with evaluate the efficacy of the two approaches. Results: There was significantly less bleeding, surgical duration, and hospitalization in the OLIF-AF group than in the TLIF group. Significant improvements in the clinical score were achieved in both groups. However, the VAS score of the lower back was significantly higher in the TLIF group than in the OLIF-AF group throughout the whole follow-up period. Significantly higher expansion of the CSA was found in the TLIF group than in the OLIF-AF group. However, the improvements in DH, LL, and SL were significantly lower in the TLIF group. The fusion rate was significantly higher in the OLIF-AF group than in the TLIF group within 6 months postoperatively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups at the final record. No significant difference was found in the rate of overall complications between the two groups (25.0% vs. 23.9%, p=.545). The intraoperative complication rate in the TLIF group (13.5%) was slightly higher than that in the OLIF-AF group (6.5%) (p=.257). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adjacent segment disorder (ASD) between the two groups (7.7% vs. 10.9%, p=.422). Cage subsidence was slightly lower in the TLIF group (5.8%) than in the OLIF-AF group (13.0%) (p=.298). Conclusions: Both the TLIF and OLIF-AF approaches demonstrated good medium-term outcomes in treating LDDs. Compared with TLIF, OLIF-AF showed advantages in postoperative recovery, improvement of intervertebral space and lumbar sagittal balance, and early intervertebral fusion but was associated with inferior spinal canal decompression efficacy. The two approaches shared comparable overall complication rates. However, OLIF-AF tended to have fewer intraoperative complications, and a higher incidence of subsidence.

Locality in Modular Systems

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Lateral Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: a Preliminary Clinical Study

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Study.

A Modified Surgical Technique of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Plate VS. Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Intervertebral Pyogenic Infection

Early Complications Associated with Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

The Effect of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program on Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease at Short-Term Follow-Up.

One‐stage Debridement Via Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Corridor Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Spontaneous Lumbar Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Case Series

Oblique lateral interbody fusion treats adjacent segment diseases after lumbar spinal fusion

Comparison of Clinical Effect and Muscle Injury Imaging Between Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Trans-Foraminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique.

A comparative study on the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis by oblique interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforminal lumbar interbody fusion

The Indirect Decompression Effect of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis

Clinical Value of One-Level Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases

[Analysis of early and middle stage efficacy and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating degenerative lumbar diseases]

[Effects of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lordosis Correction in Degenerative Lumbar Diseases].

Clinical value and effectiveness profiles of oblique lateral interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar brucellosis spondylitis

Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease A Prospective Cohort Study

Oblique Lateral Endoscopic Decompression and Interbody Fusion for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technical Note and Preliminary Results

Comparing the medium-term outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion via transforaminal and oblique approach in treating lumbar degenerative disc diseases