Abstract:The article is devoted to problems of performance art as a manifestation of actionism. It is a continuation of the research «Happening and its place on the map of the terminology system of actionism» (published [9]). This research explores poetics, aesthetics and artistic means inherent for performance art. The author traces changes in the form and substance of the performance art in the period 1950–2010 and the corresponding metamorphoses in verbal definitions.Specificity of the performance art in the personal spontaneous author’s gesture that has a social and communicative significance. Understanding and mode of perception of an artistic work was changed under its influence. The performance art appeared as a phenomenon, in its modern sense, during the 1950s, but received the name and verbal definition only during the 1970s. However, already in the 1980s, it significantly modified its form and semantics, which led to new verbal definitions among researchers. After another metamorphosis in the 1990s, the phenomenon could only be conventionally named performance art. Most researchers began to use the expression «performative practices» and in this article the author substantiates the name «actionism of spectacularity» and proposes the classification of its manifestations: the general (integral) spectacularity is the reality on the background of which «actionism of spectacularity» exists. The manifestations of the latter differ on the basis of mass or individuality, by targeting different audiences and by measuring functionality. This is «author’s spectacularity» of social activists and dissidents, «professional spectacularity» of political consultants, collective «game spectacularity» of flashmobsGeneral spectacularity is becoming more and more important in culture and communication, it gradually supersedes all other forms and ways of communication, turns into an independent audio-visual universal «language» with signs of sensuality and alogism. Actionism of spectacularity produces new effective forms of communication, which are then used in all spheres of individual or mass (through media) communication. Preferably, these are visual or audio-visual forms of communication, which promotes to their convincing among the peoples of different countries. Actionism of spectacularity contributes to the formation of public opinion about the situation of general spectacularity and promotes the adaptation of people to this new reality of the XXI century.The article contains a brief overview of performance art’s development in Ukraine.

The Coexistence of Violence and Aesthetics in Performance Art

Performance in culture and art of 1950–2010. Fluidity of form and content

Body Performance Analysis in Interactive Art Based on Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s Views

Contemporary Media Art Performance under the Visual Threshold of Interpretation

Intercultural communication in contemporary art: From provocation to integration

3. Interactivity as Artistic Mediation System. Installation and Participative Projects

Beyond “an Aesthetic of Objectivity”: Performance Ethnography, Performance Texts, and Theatricality

Violence in Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Philosophy

Removing Boundaries to Enhance Communication Between People

The Unbearable Aesthetics of Violence That Comes From Another Dimension

Artistic and aesthetic characteristics of vocal and pop performance as a genre synthesis of arts

The phenomenon of conflicts around art in the context of the contemporary public sphere

Understanding performative behaviour within content-rich Digital Live Art

The representation of violence as evil in contemporary art: the power of the image in Kiefer, Richter, and Bin Laden

Digital Performance and Creativity

The Aesthetics of Violence

2. Performance in the Artistic Career Supported by the Practice of Intense Physical Exercises

Damir Bartol Indoš and Tanja Vrvilo — House of Extreme Music Theatre: Performative Translation of Croatian Neo/Avant-garde

Difficulties in merging methodological demands and artistic conventions—"Artist's Neurophysiology in Performance" project case

Painting’s liveness

Hybridity and the Unifying Space of Painting: Larry Abramson in Conversation with Theolonius Marx