Abstract:[Purpose] This study investigates the association between ESG management and corporate risk-taking, and further examines how the level of corporate risk-taking affects the relationship between ESG management and firm value. Shareholders have an incentive to maximize profits through corporate risk-taking, but ESG management monitors and suppresses the excessive risk-taking by considering the benefits of not only shareholders but also various stakeholders around the firm and pursuing transparent governance and the promotion of social value. In addition, if ESG investment(insurance-like assets) increases, the amount invested in risky investments may relatively decrease, thereby reducing overall corporate risk-taking. However, on the other hand, since ESG activities generally involve investing in sectors that do not directly generate profits, managers may actively invest in risky businesses that can secure more profits to make up for these expenditures. Because such conflicting predictions are possible, the association between ESG management and corporate risk-taking is an issue which requires empirical analysis. [Methodology] A regression analysis was performed for domestic listed firms from 2012 to 2018 using ESG evaluation ratings provided by KCGS and corporate risk-taking variables measured by standard deviation of future profit rate. Also, this study investigates the effect of the interaction term between ESG and risk-taking level to examine the impact of corporate risk-taking on the relationship between ESG management and firm value. [Findings] This study finds that the higher ESG evaluation score, the lower corporate risk-taking, and this negative relationship was significant in the governance element among the three elements of environment, social, and governance. Additionally, a significantly positive relationship between ESG management and firm value exists only when the level of corporate risk-taking is low, and there is no such relationship when the level of corporate risk-taking is high. [Implications] This study contributes to the accounting literature by showing that ESG management affects corporate risk-taking related to investment activities and that ESG management has a positive impact on firm value only when excessive risk-taking is restrained.

Managerial overconfidence, CSR and firm value

Effect of CEO Overconfidence Tendency on ESG Evaluation Information

Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea

Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea

Do firms manage corporate social responsibility strategically?: Evidence from ESG ratings of Korean firms

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The impact of the MSCI ESG Ratings on Korean Firms

The Association between ESG Management and Corporate Risk-taking, and Firm Value

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea

Executive Overconfidence and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance

Which Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Affects the Cost of Equity? Evidence from Korea

The Influence of Managerial Overconfidence on CSR: Based on A－Share Listed Chinese Companies

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Evidence from Korea

CSR reporting, assurance, and firm value and risk: The moderating effects of CSR committees and executive compensation

Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea

Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China

The Relationship between Corporate Sustainable Development Performance, Investor Sentiment, and Managerial Overconfidence

Corporate social responsibility and firm-value: the role of sensitive industries and CEOs power in China

Local corporate social responsibility, media coverage, and shareholder value

The value of corporate social responsibility: evidence from the humidifier disinfectant scandal in Korea