International fuel performance study of fresh fuel experiments for PCMI effects during RIA experiments
Seokbin Seo,Charles Folsom,Colby Jensen,David Kamerman,Luana Giaccardi,Marco Cherubini,Pavel Suk,Martin Sevecek,Jerome Sercombe,Isabelle Guenot-Delahaie,Alessandro Scolaro,Matthieu Reymond,Katalin Kulacsy,Luis Herranz,Francisco Feria,Pau Aragón,Grigori Khvostov,Imran Khan,Anuj Kumar Deo,Srinivasa Rao Ravva,Rolando Calabrese,Felix Boldt,Jonathan Sappl,Florian Falk,Asko Arkoma,Georgenthum Vincent,Yudai Tasaki,Kazuo Kakiuchi,Yutaka Udagawa,Gregory Delipei,Charles Cheron,James Corson,Jinzhao Zhang,Thomas Drieu,Jan Klouzal,Martin Dostal,Vitezslav Matocha,Tereza Kinkorová,Carlo Fiorina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113673
IF: 1.7
2024-11-05
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Abstract:This paper presents the results of High-burnup Experiments for Reactivity-initiated Accident (HERA) Modeling & Simulation (M&S) exercise. The HERA project under the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Second Framework for Irradiation Experiments (FIDES-II) program is focused on studying Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel behavior during Reactivity-Initiated Accident (RIA) conditions. The Part I M&S cases are based on a series of tests in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility in the United States and the Nuclear Safety Research Reactor (NSRR) in Japan. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the test design to accomplish its goals in establishing clearer understanding of the effects of power pulse width during RIA conditions. The blind predictions using various computational tools have been performed and compared amongst to interpret the behaviors of high burnup fuels during RIA. While many international participants evaluate the thermal–mechanical behavior of fuel rod under different conditions, a considerable scatter of outputs comes out for the cases due to the disparity between codes in predicting mechanical behaviors. In general, however, the results of thermal–mechanical analysis elaborate that nominal design conditions the shorter pulse width tests in NSRR should cause cladding failures while the TREAT tests appear to have more split prediction of failure or not. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis varying key testing parameters reveals the considerable effect of power pulse width and total energy deposition on prediction of fuel rod failure.
nuclear science & technology